Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM ; 6(6): 101363, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38574858

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Because selective termination for discordant dichorionic twin anomalies carries a risk of pregnancy loss, deferring the procedure until the third trimester can be considered in settings where it is legal. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether perinatal outcomes were more favorable following deferred rather than immediate selective termination. STUDY DESIGN: A French multicenter retrospective study from 2012 to 2023 on dichorionic twin pregnancies with selective termination for fetal conditions, which were diagnosed before 24 weeks gestation. Pregnancies with additional risk factors for late miscarriage were excluded. We defined 2 groups according to the intention to perform selective termination within 2 weeks after the diagnosis of the severe fetal anomaly was established (immediate selective termination) or to wait until the third trimester (deferred selective termination). The primary outcome was perinatal survival at 28 days of life. Secondary outcomes were pregnancy losses before 24 weeks gestation and preterm delivery. RESULTS: Of 390 pregnancies, 258 were in the immediate selective termination group and 132 in the deferred selective termination group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Overall survival of the healthy co-twin was 93.8% (242/258) in the immediate selective termination group vs 100% (132/132) in the deferred selective termination group (P<.01). Preterm birth <37 weeks gestation was lower in the immediate than in the deferred selective termination group (66.7% vs 20.2%; P<.01); preterm birth <28 weeks gestation and <32 weeks gestation did not differ significantly (respectively 1.7% vs 0.8%; P=.66 and 8.26% vs 11.4%; P=.36). In the deferred selective termination group, an emergency procedure was performed in 11.3% (15/132) because of threatened preterm labor, of which 3.7% (5/132) for imminent delivery. CONCLUSION: Overall survival after selective termination was high regardless of the gestational age at which the procedure was performed. Postponing selective termination until the third trimester seems to improve survival, whereas immediate selective termination reduces the risk of preterm delivery. Furthermore, deferred selective termination requires an expert center capable of performing the selective termination procedure on an emergency basis if required.


Assuntos
Anormalidades Congênitas , Gravidez de Gêmeos , Humanos , Gravidez , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , França/epidemiologia , Adulto , Anormalidades Congênitas/diagnóstico , Anormalidades Congênitas/epidemiologia , Anormalidades Congênitas/prevenção & controle , Recém-Nascido , Nascimento Prematuro/prevenção & controle , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Resultado da Gravidez/epidemiologia , Terceiro Trimestre da Gravidez , Idade Gestacional , Redução de Gravidez Multifetal/métodos , Redução de Gravidez Multifetal/estatística & dados numéricos , Fatores de Tempo , Aborto Espontâneo/epidemiologia , Aborto Espontâneo/prevenção & controle
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...