RESUMO
Background and aims: The treatment of oligometastatic disease has become common practice as advanced radiotherapy techniques became more available. Lung is one of the main metastatic sites for a majority of cancers and many of these patients present with a limited metastatic disease burden. For these patients, SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) represents a non-invasive treatment alternative. In this report we present our experience with our first series of patients with limited metastatic disease treated with lung SBRT. The purpose of this paper is to provide a qualitative and quantitative assessment of the lung SBRT treatment process and algorithm leading up to treatment delivery in a community-based radiotherapy department. Methods: We have retrospectively reviewed our first series of 41 patients with lung oligometastases from various malignancies, treated using SBRT between March 2019 and December 2020. Demographic, technical and outcome data were analyzed. Results: A number of 45 lung metastases (in 41 patients) were treated with SBRT during the specified time period. The median age was 65.7 years old (range 33-83). 16 patients (39%) were treated for multiple lesions and the mean number of treated lesions was 1 (range1-3). Median dose prescribed was 50 Gy /5 fractions (median BED10 =77 Gy). The median intra-fraction displacements were: Vertical (0.23cm), Longitudinal (-0.27 cm), Lateral (-0.1 cm), Pitch [0.22°], Roll [0.15°], Rotation [0.32°]. The median session time was 40 minutes. All patients completed the prescribed course of treatment.Preliminary clinical data were recorded. With a median follow-up of 9 months, local control was recorded in all but one patient. At the last known follow-up, local control was recorded for 39 (85%) out of 45 treated lesions. Conclusion: For lung SBRT, the required corrections at the time of treatment delivery are small, as long as strict protocols are implemented. Preliminary data for lung metastasis in oligometastatic patients support SBRT as a viable method of achieving high rates of early local control. These results need to be further confirmed in a larger cohort of patients with longer follow-up.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acromegaly is a complex endocrine disorder caused by excessive secretion of GH, secondary to a GH secreting pituitary adenoma or a mixed pituitary adenoma secreting GH and PRL. METHODS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of combination therapy: dopamine agonist and somatostatin analogue on GH and IGF1 levels in a group of 30 patients with acromegaly. Cabergoline in a dose of 2 mg/week and 4 mg/week respectively was associated with Sandostatin LAR in a dose of 20 mg/month and 30 mg/months respectively. Eight patients were treated with Lanreotide 30 mg/week and Cabergoline 2 mg/week and 3 patients were treated with Bromocriptine 10 mg/day and Sandostatin LAR 30 mg/month. RESULTS: Combination therapy: Cabergoline and Sandostatin achieved normal levels of IGF1 in 32% of the patients, better results being obtained after 12 months of treatment in the group treated with 4 mg Cabergoline/week. In 37% of cases the levels of IGF1 decreased by 50% after 12 months of treatment. In the group treated with Cabergoline and Somatuline a normal level of IGF1 was achieved in 25% of patients after 12 months of treatment. The outcome for the group treated with Sandostatin and Bromocriptine was similar to that obtained under Cabergoline 2 mg/week. There was no significant correlation between the level of GH and the type or dose of dopamine agonist used. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, combination therapy consisting of dopamine agonist and somatostatin analogue achieves a significant reduction of IGF1 levels in patients with mixed adenomas secreting GH and PRL. A decrease in IGF1 levels is directly correlated with the dose of Cabergoline used.
