Blaming the young is always more accessible rather than accusing the older employees: an experimental view over age and health in organizations.

Introduction: The stereotype content model postulates that different groups evoke different emotions and reactions based on two dimensions: intention toward others (warmth) and competence. Methods: In this study, we used an experimental design and a qualitative approach to investigate how managerial strategies are selected and motivated when a subordinate makes a work task related error but belongs to a group that is stereotypical perceived differently in terms of warmth and competence (age groups with or without a medical condition). Thus 75 employees analyzed one of the five hypothetical cases and described the managerial strategy and motivation for usage. Results: Data revealed that managerial strategies incorporate more active harm elements for younger employees in contrast with vulnerable groups (older employees with unspecified medical conditions, younger or older employees with a medical condition), who benefit from more active facilitation strategies. The strategy usage motivation is also different in the case of younger employees, the control group and the vulnerable groups. Discussion: The study outcomes bring additional evidence to support the stereotype content model theory and the socioemotional selectivity theory, enriching applicability on organizational practice and human resources management.

Supporting the Return to Work After Cancer in Romania: Exploring Employers' Perspectives.

Purpose Evidence shows that employers play a key role in facilitating the return to work of employees with cancer, yet little is known about the employers' experiences in settings where no policies or regulations are available to guide this process. Against this background, we aimed (1) to understand how employers experience and manage the process of having employees with cancer and (2) to explore their reflections regarding their role in returning to work. Methods Twenty employers from various types of organisations and sectors were interviewed. Inductive thematic analysis was performed using NVivo 11. Results Employers experienced having employees with cancer as a process with three distinct phases reflected in three emerging themes: disclosure of the diagnosis and absence from work; returning to work; post-returning to work. A fourth theme emphasizes the employers' reflections on how they conceive their own role. In the absence of a normative framework for dealing with employees with cancer, employers used commonsensical rules of thumb and immediate solutions based on ad-hoc decisions and were often compelled to innovate. They offered accommodations only if requested by the employee after returning to work. The return to work process was neither planned nor phased. Conclusion Employers need information and guidelines for effectively assisting employees with cancer. Better channels of communication and collaboration with health professionals are essential for more adequate support for the long-term consequences of cancer. A detailed return to work policy is required to tackle the inconsistencies in the support offered and this policy must also rethink how diagnosis disclosure takes place in Romanian organisations.

Working as a cancer survivor in Romania: an overview of the statutory policies for return to work.

Purpose: Over the last several years, the number of working-age patients with cancer in Europe and Romania has consistently increased. Considerable efforts are made to bring cancer survivors back to the workforce, generating remarkable individual and societal benefits. Legislation and policies are essential factors in achieving this goal. The aim of the present article is to analyze the Romanian statutory policies for returning to work after cancer.Methods: A comprehensive search using key terms was carried out on the websites of the Ministry of Labor and Ministry of Health and also within the Romanian Official Gazette, which is the official national paper-based repository of legal documents. Nine work-related policy documents were found, and recurrent themes were identified. Within these themes, the authors synthetized the information on provisions, actors, structures, processes and responsibilities.Results: Three themes emerged from the analysis: (1) General and cancer-specific provisions; (2) The cancer survivor's journey in relation to work; and (3) Work adjustments. The policies contain no measures for incentivising return to work. The mechanisms for collaboration and coordination among stakeholders are not described in the policies.Conclusions: The current policies put an emphasis on compensation but fail to encompass activation measures. Considering that, for several components of the return to work process, the general principles are already stated in the law, it is vital to further develop the policies in the sense of specifying the procedures, roles and responsibilities for the stakeholders involved.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONBeing diagnosed with cancer can result in long-term disability and considerable difficulties to reenter the labor market which policy makers need to address.The legislation should focus on providing work-related activities and physical and vocational rehabilitation services to cancer survivors, as measures for an active labor market.The policy should provide vocational rehabilitation and work-related support groups for working-age patients with cancer, starting at the end of the first year of invalidity pension, thus preparing the transition back to the labor market.There is a pressing need to have a country-specific legislation for employers, as they have a tremendous impact on the return to work process.