Loss of tolerance to amphetamine-induced hypophagia in rats: homeostatic readjustment vs. instrumental learning.

According to the homeostatic model, the loss of tolerance to amphetamine-induced hypophagia requires a period of unrestricted feeding in the drug-free state, which transforms the compensatory response mediating tolerance ("hyperhunger") into a functional disturbance to homeostasis. In the absence of such a disturbance, tolerance should be retained. To test this prediction, rats tolerant to amphetamine's hypophagic effect were given a 4-week tolerance retention period during which milk intakes were restricted and deprivation levels held relatively constant. During this period the rats were assigned to one of the following drug treatment conditions: 1) saline injections both before and after daily milk tests (saline group); 2) saline injections before, and amphetamine injections after, daily milk tests (after group); 3) no injections and no milk tests (no-treatment group); or 4) amphetamine injections before, and saline injections after, milk tests (before group). Despite the restricted feeding regimen, both the saline and after groups lost tolerance. These results do not support the homeostatic model, but are consistent with the instrumental learning model, which views drinking milk in the undrugged state as analogous to receiving noncontingent reinforcement.

Experiential constraints on the development of tolerance to amphetamine hypophagia following sensitization of stereotypy: instrumental contingencies regulate the expression of sensitization.

In previous research, sensitization of stereotypy induced by injections of 2.5 mg/kg amphetamine did not interfere with subsequent tolerance development to the hypophagic effect of 2 mg/kg. This study examined the effect of a higher sensitizing dose. Rats given intermittent injections of 5 mg/kg amphetamine and then challenged with various doses of amphetamine showed focused head scanning at 2 mg/kg and oral stereotypy at 4 mg/kg. In contrast, saline controls showed diffuse sniffing and head scanning at 2 and 4 mg/kg. Subgroups from each condition were then given daily injections of either amphetamine (2 mg/kg) or saline and access to milk for 30 min. Dose-response tests revealed that both drugged groups learned to suppress stereotypy in order to feed at 2 mg/kg, but only the non-sensitized group could do so at 4 mg/kg. These results demonstrate that (1) rats learn to suppress only those stereotyped movements that they experience in the context of feeding and (2) instrumental contingencies can influence the expression of behavioral sensitization.