Cross-Cultural Adaptation, Reliability, and Convergent Validity of Occupational Self-Assessment for Brazilian Portuguese.

The Occupational Self-Assessment version 2.2 (OSA) is a self-assessment of the client's occupational competence and values. To describe the process of cross-cultural adaptation of OSA into Brazilian Portuguese (OSA-Brazil) and examine its reliability and validity for use with the Brazilian population. Assessment translation was guided by two international guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of standardized instruments. Face validity was tested with 24 participants. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity were tested with a convenience sample of 40 participants. The cross-cultural adaptation process concluded with a consensus among the expert panel review (r > 80%) and evidence of strong face validity. The OSA-Brazil demonstrated appropriate test-retest reliability (r > 0.70) and convergent validity with the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) (p < .05). The OSA-Brazil has good face validity, test-retest reliability, and convergent validity. The assessment can be used by the Brazilian occupational therapists to assess client's occupational competence.

Evolution of rehabilitation services in response to a global pandemic: reflection on opportunities and challenges ahead.

The rapidly evolving COVID-19 public health emergency has disrupted and challenged traditional healthcare, rehabilitation services, and treatment delivery worldwide. This perspective paper aimed to unite experiences and perspectives from an international group of rehabilitation providers while reflecting on the lessons learned from the challenges and opportunities raised during the COVID-19 pandemic. We discuss the global appreciation for rehabilitation services and changes in access to healthcare, including virtual, home-based rehabilitation, and long-term care rehabilitation. We illustrate lessons learned by highlighting successful rehabilitation approaches from the US, Belgium, and Japan.

Exploring Well-Being: Resilience, Stress, and Self-Care in Occupational Therapy Practitioners and Students.

Burnout is increasingly documented in occupational therapy (OT); however, practitioner and student well-being have not been examined to date. The research aim was to explore the relationship between well-being, resilience, stress, and self-care in OT. For this purpose, a cross-sectional survey of practitioners and students was done, including a background survey, World Health Organization-5 Well-Being Index (WHO-5), Brief Resilience Scale (BRS), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS). Open-ended questions and Visual Analog Scales were used to gather satisfaction and service access. Practitioners (n = 235) and students (n = 200) reported well-being "less than half of the time" on the WHO-5, "moderate" stress on the PSS, and "normal" resilience on the BRS. The BRS, PSS, and MSCS explained a significant proportion of variance on the WHO-5 for practitioners and students. Most participants used at least one self-care strategy and desired additional organizational services. The findings of elevated stress and decreased well-being underscore the importance of reimagining wellness initiatives in OT.

Communicating With Intention: Therapist and Parent Perspectives on Family-Centered Care in Early Intervention.

IMPORTANCE: Responsive communication is critical to ensuring family-centered care in early intervention (EI). The Intentional Relationship Model (IRM) offers a framework for examining therapist-parent communication and offers strategies for supporting therapist responsiveness. OBJECTIVE: To explore family-centered care and therapists' communication in EI using the IRM. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study. SETTING: Illinois EI program. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 101 therapists and 19 parents enrolled in an EI program. Therapist disciplines included developmental (n = 24), occupational (n = 32), physical (n = 17), and speech (n = 28) therapy. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Demographic questionnaire, Early Interventionist Self-Efficacy Scale, Early Intervention Parenting Self-Efficacy Scale, Measure of Processes of Care (MPOC)-Short Form, MPOC-Service Provider, Clinical Assessment of Modes (CAM), and Clinical Assessment of Suboptimal Interaction-Short Form (CASI-SF). RESULTS: Therapists used family-centered practices specific to relationship building more frequently than information sharing (especially sharing of general information). Therapists used the empathizing, encouraging, and instructing modes most frequently in their interactions with families. Participants' scores on the MPOC, CAM, and CASI-SF were significantly correlated. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Therapist-parent interactions were aligned with family-centered care. Opportunities for practitioners were identified in (1) sharing specific and general information and (2) expanding the use of collaborating, problem-solving, and advocating modes. What This Article Adds: In this study, we explored how the IRM can inform family-centered practices in EI through examination of therapists' interpersonal competency and therapeutic mode use.

Evaluating Students' Use of Therapeutic Communication in Entry-Level Education: The Observer Version of the Clinical Assessment of Modes (CAM-Observer).

IMPORTANCE: The Intentional Relationship Model (IRM) guides learning about therapeutic use of self. The observer version of the Clinical Assessment of Modes (CAM-Observer) may be used to evaluate students' therapeutic communication as the process is defined in the IRM. OBJECTIVE: To assess the structural validity of the CAM-Observer. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, psychometric study. SETTING: Master's in occupational therapy program. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred thirty-four entry-level students. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The overall CAM-Observer and the individual subscales (Advocating, Collaborating, Empathizing, Encouraging, Instructing, Problem-Solving) were used to assess students' communication from the instructor's perspective. RESULTS: The overall CAM-Observer and six subscales demonstrated appropriate rating scale functioning and dimensionality. The Advocating subscale demonstrated poor item fit, floor effects, and low person separation. One Collaborating item demonstrated poor fit to the overall CAM-Observer and the Collaborating subscale, requiring revision. Instructing and Encouraging items were most likely to be endorsed by the instructor-observers, resulting in a ceiling effect for the Instructing and Encouraging subscales. The Advocating and Problem-Solving items were least likely to be endorsed by the instructor-observers. Except for the Problem-Solving subscale, the overall CAM-Observer and the individual subscales could reliably separate items according to difficulty. Except for the Advocating subscale, the overall CAM-Observer and the individual subscales could reliably separate people into high- and low-performance groups. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CAM-Observer offers a structurally valid and theoretically grounded assessment of students' therapeutic communication as the process is defined in the IRM. The CAM-Observer can be integrated into occupational therapy education to guide students' critical reflection on their interpersonal communication. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: The CAM-Observer offers a means of evaluating students' therapeutic use of self.

Validation of the Clinical Assessment of Modes-Therapist Version (CAM-T) in Acute Rehabilitation Settings.

IMPORTANCE: Assessments that evaluate health care providers' communication in acute rehabilitation settings remain scarce; this article contributes to the knowledge base. OBJECTIVE: To assess the reliability and validity of the Clinical Assessment of Modes-Therapist version (CAM-T) from the provider's perspective. DESIGN: Cross-sectional, psychometric study. SETTING: Acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety-six clients and 32 providers (occupational therapy, physical therapy, and nursing). MEASURES: The CAM-T was psychometrically evaluated using classical test theory and Rasch analytic approaches. RESULTS: The findings offer strong evidence for the CAM-T's reliability and validity for evaluating overall communication and adequate evidence for evaluating individual communication modes. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: The CAM-T may be used by providers as a self-assessment of communication in occupational therapy and in associated rehabilitation professions. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: This article offers evidence in support of the CAM-T's reliability and validity for evaluating health care providers' communication with clients in acute rehabilitation settings. The CAM-T may be used to evaluate providers' overall communication and individual mode use as described in the Intentional Relationship Model.

Volitional questionnaire: Psychometric evaluation of the finnish translation.

Background: Supporting clients' motivation to engage in occupations is essential to occupational therapy practice. The Volitional Questionnaire Finnish version (VQ-FI) can be used to evaluate volitional behaviors of clients with limited ability to communicate.Objective: The many-facet Rasch model was used to evaluate the reliability and validity of the VQ-FI using the FACETS and WINSTEPS software.Methods and materials: Forty-two therapists received an in-person training on the VQ-FI and completed 226 independent ratings of clients. The VQ-FI was evaluated in its rating scale functioning, unidimensionality, person validity, rater severity, item targeting, and item/person separation.Results: The four-point rating scale demonstrated adequate functioning; the 'passive' rating category was rarely adopted. The VQ-FI showed unidimensionality, with all 14 items fitting the Rasch model. No evidence for ceiling or floor effects, and the assessment demonstrated appropriate item and person separation. The VQ-FI reliably separated participants to three levels of ability.Conclusions: The study provides preliminary evidence for the reliability and validity of the VQ-FI.Significance: The VQ-FI is an observational measure that can be used to evaluate clients' volitional behaviors. The VQ-FI offers practitioners and researchers a valid approach to evaluate volition that is theoretically grounded in the Model of Human Occupation.

Psychometric evaluation of the Finnish translation of the assessment of communication and interaction skills (ACIS-FI).

Background: The Model of Human Occupation (MOHO) is a widely used conceptual practice model in Finland. Therefore, Finnish translations of valid and reliable MOHO assessments are needed.Objective: The primary objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of the Finnish translation of the Assessment of Communication and Interaction Skills (ACIS-FI) using the many-facet Rasch model approach.Methods and Materials: Twenty-eight occupational therapists completed an in-person training workshop on the ACIS-FI and participated as raters in this study. One hundred and forty-eight clients were rated using the ACIS-FI. Rating scale functioning, unidimensionality, person validity and rater severity, item targeting, and item and person separation statistics were examined.Results: The rating scales demonstrated adequate functioning; the rating category 'deficit' was infrequently adopted by the raters. The ACIS-FI had satisfactory construct validity, as confirmed by all items exhibiting unidimensionality within a single construct (i.e. communication and interaction skills), and appropriate item fit. Validity was further confirmed through low person misfit (6%) and low rater misfit (3.6%). No ceiling or floor effects were found. The ACIS-FI was able to separate clients into four levels of communication and interaction skills.Conclusions: This study offers evidence for the validity of the ACIS-FI as a measure of communication and interaction skills in occupational therapy.Significance: The ACIS-FI offers Finnish practitioners and researchers a valid tool to measure communication and interactions skills that is theoretically grounded in the MOHO.

Development and Validation of the Occupational Self-Assessment-Short Form (OSA-SF).

IMPORTANCE: The Occupational Self-Assessment, Version 2.2 (OSA 2.2), is a client-centered measure of clients' perceived occupational competence and value. The OSA 2.2 has previously demonstrated good structural validity and internal consistency; however, the administration length could deter therapists from using this assessment in acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate reliability and validity of the OSA 2.2 in acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation and to develop and validate the OSA-Short Form (OSA-SF). DESIGN: We performed a descriptive psychometric analysis using the Rasch analytic approach. SETTING: The data were collected in acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Our convenience sample consisted of 86 patients in acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation. OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Participants rated their perceived occupational competence and value by completing the OSA 2.2. RESULTS: We examined psychometric properties of the OSA 2.2 and OSA-SF using a partial credit Rasch model. The 21-item OSA 2.2 was reduced to a 12-item OSA-SF through iterative removal of items on the basis of item-misfit statistics. The OSA-SF demonstrated adequate rating scale functioning, dimensionality, item and person goodness of fit, item targeting, item hierarchies, and item and person separation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Findings indicate that the OSA-SF is a valid and reliable measure that can guide client-centered goal setting and intervention planning for adults receiving acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation. WHAT THIS ARTICLE ADDS: The OSA 2.2 and the OSA-SF offer a client-centered approach to evaluating patients' self-reported ability and ratings of the importance of performing everyday occupations. These assessments can guide client-centered goal setting in acute care and acute inpatient rehabilitation.