The Utility of Stress Ultrasound in Identifying Risk Factors for Elbow Ulnar Collateral Ligament Tear: A Longitudinal Study of 203 Professional Baseball Players.

BACKGROUND: Injuries to the medial ulnar collateral ligament (UCL) are common among baseball pitchers due to repetitive stress on the soft tissue stabilizers of the elbow during pitching. Dynamic stress ultrasound (SUS) can be used to evaluate the UCL and ulnohumeral joint to identify anatomic risk factors of those who will require UCL reconstruction (UCLR). PURPOSE: To determine whether any adaptive or morphological changes detectable on SUS can predict injury to the UCL in professional baseball pitchers. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: A total of 203 professional baseball pitchers who underwent SUS at preseason training sessions over the course of 18 years were categorized into 1 of 2 groups: those without a history of shoulder, arm, elbow, or forearm surgery or injuries (healthy cohort; n = 184) and those who underwent UCLR the same season as SUS (UCLR cohort; n = 19). Ligament thickness, joint spacing, and laxity were compared. An additional matched cohort analysis was conducted using 10 players from each group to detect differences in the progression of UCL and ulnohumeral joint measures in the year before injury. RESULTS: The UCLR cohort, when compared with the healthy cohort, had higher relative (ie, nondominant-side measurements subtracted from dominant-side measurements) resting ulnohumeral joint space (median, 0.50 vs 0.20 mm, respectively; P = .006) and higher rates of hypoechoic foci (57.9% vs 30.4%, respectively; P = .030). Players of both groups had similar dominant UCL thickness (P = .161), ulnohumeral joint space at rest (P = .321), space under stress (P = .498), and laxity (P = .796). Groups did not differ in terms of relative UCL thickness, ulnohumeral joint space under stress, or relative laxity. In the year before UCL injury, the UCLR cohort, compared with the matched healthy cohort, had a greater increase in mean dominant UCL thickness (0.94 vs -0.60 mm, respectively; P = .038) and a greater increase in relative median UCL thickness (1.35 vs -0.35 mm, respectively; P = .045). Players in the healthy cohort were statistically older than those in the UCLR cohort (23 vs 22 years, respectively; P = .004). No differences in ulnohumeral stress spacing or laxity were detected. CONCLUSION: SUS of players who underwent UCLR demonstrated a progressive increase in UCL thickness over 1 year, higher rates of hypoechoic foci, and increased ulnohumeral rest space compared with SUS of uninjured players.

Surgical Management of Traumatic Meniscus Injuries.

The menisci increase the contact area of load bearing in the knee and thus disperse the mechanical stress via their circumferential tensile fibers. Traumatic meniscus injuries cause mechanical symptoms in the knee, and are more prevalent amongst younger, more active patients, compared to degenerative tears amongst the elderly population. Traumatic meniscus tears typically result from the load-and-shear mechanism in the knee joint. The treatment depends on the size, location, and pattern of the tear. For non-repairable tears, partial or total meniscal resection decreases its tensile stress and increases joint contact stress, thus potentiating the risk of arthritis. A longitudinal vertical tear pattern at the peripheral third red-red zone leads to higher healing potential after repair. The postoperative rehabilitation protocols after repair range from immediate weight-bearing with no range of motion restrictions to non-weight bearing and delayed mobilization for weeks. Pediatric and adolescent patients may require special considerations due to their activity levels, or distinct pathologies such as a discoid meniscus. Further biomechanical and biologic evidence is needed to guide surgical management, postoperative rehabilitation protocols, and future technology applications for traumatic meniscus injuries.

Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury and Recovery in Professional Snowboarders: The Extreme Sport of Snowboardcross.

Introduction  An anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear is a devastating injury for athletes that is predominantly low energy and non-contact in nature. ACL tears are one of the most well-researched injuries in sports, however, scant research has been done on competitive snowboarders. Boardercross is a relatively new sport introduced to the Winter Olympics in 2006. Initially, it entailed four snowboarders racing head-to-head down a course of obstacles in a race to the finish, with the top two riders advancing to the next rounds. It has since expanded to six racers traveling up to 60 mph and jumps up to 100 feet in length in a head-to-head race to the finish. This extreme sport puts its athletes at risk for serious injury, requiring investigation. Purpose Investigate the prevalence of ACL tears in the extreme sport of boardercross, evaluate sport-specific factors that may put athletes at higher risk, and report return to sport data. Methods An expedited IRB approval was obtained. A survey was distributed to athletes via e-mail to national/regional coaches of countries with competitive boardercross teams. Professional coaches distributed the survey and secondarily distributed it to athletes. Results Sixty-six competitive snowboardcross athletes responded to the email surveys 48.5% of respondents had torn their ACL at least once in their career. Of the female respondents, 55.6% suffered at least one ACL tear, and 43.6% of male respondents suffered at least one ACL tear. 31.2% suffered more than one ACL tear during their career. Of those who tore their ACL, 91.3% (p <0.001) tore their front leg. 100.0% of the respondent athletes returned to sport post-ACL reconstruction. Conclusion Professional boardercross racers are at a higher risk of tearing their ACL than other winter sport athletes, including alpine skiers. A predominance of ACL injuries occurred on the front leg during landing from an aerial maneuver. All respondent athletes returned to the sport after injury, with approximately half returning within six months. Although no statistical significance was achieved, the data provided trends on risk factors related to ACL injuries among snowboardcross athletes.

An updated analysis of shoulder and elbow questions on the Orthopedic In-Training Examination.

BACKGROUND: The Orthopedic In-Training Examination (OITE) is an annual examination for orthopedic surgery residents used to assess orthopedic knowledge across a national standard. Having an updated understanding of currently tested topics and resources is useful to help residents guide their education. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to analyze the shoulder and elbow domain of the OITE in an effort to provide current trends and commonly tested topics. METHODS: All OITE questions related to shoulder and elbow topics over the years 2009-2013 and 2017-2020 were analyzed. Subcategories, the number and types of references used, publication lag time, imaging modalities, taxonomic classification, and resident performance were recorded. RESULTS: Shoulder and elbow topics comprised 8.61% of all OITE questions from 2009-2013 and 2017-2020. The most commonly tested shoulder topics were rotator cuff arthropathy and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (13.6%), followed by hemiarthroplasty and total shoulder arthroplasty (12.9%), rotator cuff-related pathology (12.9%), anterior shoulder instability and/or dislocation (10.2%), and general anatomy (10.2%). The most commonly tested elbow topics were trauma (21%), ulnar collateral ligament injuries (12.12%), general anatomy (10%), and arthroplasty (10%). Decisions regarding management or appropriate next steps (taxonomy T3) comprised 39% of all question types. The incorporation of imaging modalities continues to be an important component of the OITE questions. The Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery (JSES), the Journal of the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (JAAOS), the Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (JBJS), and the American Journal of Sports Medicine (AJSM) comprised 65% of articles referenced in all questions over our analysis period. CONCLUSION: This study provides an updated analysis of trends within the shoulder and elbow domain of the OITE. Application of these data can aid residents in their preparation for the examination.