Zirconia-Toughened Alumina Ceramic Wear Particles Do Not Elicit Inflammatory Responses in Human Macrophages.

Ten percent of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) require revision surgery. One of the reasons for THA are wear particles released from the implants that can activate the immune defense and cause osteolysis and failure of the joint implant. The discrepancies between reports on toxicity and immunogenicity of the implant materials led us to this study in which we compared toxicity and immunogenicity of well-defined nanoparticles from Al2O3, zirconia-toughened alumina (ZTA), and cobalt chrome (CoCr), a human THP-1 macrophage cell line, human PBMCs, and therefrom-derived primary macrophages. None of the tested materials decreased the viability of THP-1 macrophages nor human primary macrophages at the 24 h time point, indicating that at concentrations from 0.05 to 50 µm3/cell the tested materials are non-toxic. Forty-eight hours of treatment of THP-1 macrophages with 5 µm3/cell of CoCr and Al2O3 caused 8.3-fold and 4.6-fold increases in TNF-α excretion, respectively, which was not observed for ZTA. The comparison between THP-1 macrophages and human primary macrophages revealed that THP-1 macrophages show higher activation of cytokine expression in the presence of CoCr and Al2O3 particles than primary macrophages. Our results indicate that ZTA is a non-toxic implant material with no immunogenic effects in vitro.

Ceramic Wear Particles: Can They Be Retrieved In Vivo and Duplicated In Vitro?

BACKGROUND: Little is known about retrieved zirconia platelet toughened alumina (ZPTA) wear particles from ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty. Our objectives were to evaluate clinically retrieved wear particles from explanted periprosthetic hip tissues and to analyze the characteristics of in vitro-generated ZPTA wear particles. METHODS: Periprosthetic tissue and explants were received for 3 patients who underwent a total hip replacement of ZPTA COC head and liner. Wear particles were isolated and characterized via scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy. The ZPTA and control (highly cross-linked polyethylene and cobalt chromium alloy) were then generated in vitro using a hip simulator and pin-on-disc testing, respectively. Particles were assessed in accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials F1877. RESULTS: Minimal ceramic particles were identified in the retrieved tissue, consistent with the retrieved components demonstrating minimal abrasive wear with material transfer. Average particle diameter from in vitro studies was 292 nm for ZPTA, 190 nm for highly cross-linked polyethylene, and 201 nm for cobalt chromium alloy. CONCLUSION: The minimal number of in vivo ZPTA wear particles observed is consistent with the successful tribological history of COC total hip arthroplasties. Due to the relatively few ceramic particles located in the retrieved tissue, in part due to implantation times of 3 to 6 years, a statistical comparison was unable to be made between the in vivo particles and the in vitro-generated ZPTA particles. However, the study provided further insight into the size and morphological characteristics of ZPTA particles generated from clinically relevant in vitro test setups.

Surgeons' Awareness and Impaction Technique of a Ceramic Liner into a Metal Shell.

Background: In ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty, firm locking is necessary between a ceramic liner and an acetabular metal shell to prevent dissociation of the liner from the metal shell. We evaluated surgeons' awareness of the technique for inserting the ceramic liner and measured the impaction force applied by surgeons during the insertion of the ceramic liner. Methods: To evaluate the awareness, we conducted a survey using a questionnaire including techniques for ceramic liner insertion. The impaction force was measured using an impaction simulator in 224 surgeons. Results: Most surgeons answered that they cleaned and dried up the inner surface of the metal shell before inserting a ceramic liner (96.4% and 86.2%, respectively), and 74.6% checked the correct seating of the ceramic liner. However, only 23.2% correctly answered that a minimum of 2kN (a light strike) was necessary to obtain a sufficient fit between the metal shell and the ceramic liner. The impaction force was weaker than 2 kN in 9.4% of the surgeons. Conclusions: Education about the adequate impaction force to obtain a firm fit of the ceramic liner is necessary for surgeons who perform total hip arthroplasty using ceramic-on-ceramic bearings.

Pushing Ceramic-on-Ceramic in the most extreme wear conditions: A hip simulator study.

BACKGROUND: Hip revision surgery for fractured ceramic components may represent the worst-case wear scenario due to the high risks of recurrent dislocations, instability, and third body wear. The ideal bearing choice for the new prosthetic articulation is still subject of debate, while alumina matrix composite (AMC) articulations offer theoretical superior performances; the present work was designed to test the wear behaviour of ceramic on ceramic articulations (liner and head) in a worst-case scenario by adding ceramic third-body particles to the test lubricant with combined walking and subluxation cycles in a hip joint simulator. Therefore, we performed an in vitro study aiming to assess how does AMC articulation perform with 1) third-body particles added to the test environment and 2) under subluxation stresses. HYPOTHESIS: We hypothesised that AMC articulations offer superior performances in such worst conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A hip simulator test was designed to analyse how AMC articulation performs with third-body particles added to the test environment and under subluxation stresses. Two different load patterns including level walking and subluxation of the ceramic liner were applied. The test fluid lubricant was contaminated by adding coarse ceramic particles during the first 2 million cycles and fine ceramic particles from 2 to 4 million cycles. Group 1 consisted of an alumina matrix composite articulation (liner and head); group 2 consisted of an alumina liner and an alumina matrix composite head. A control group consisting of an alumina ceramic liner articulated against an alumina matrix composite head was provided and only axially loaded. The liners of groups 1 and 2 were tested at an in vivo angle of 45° in the medial lateral plane (inclinationangle), which corresponds to an angle L=30° relative to the ISO standard fixated position used for in vitro testing. All mass measurements were performed using a high precision balance (Sartorius BP211D). During each examination, images on dedicated location of the bearing surfaces were taken using a digital microscope. RESULTS: Mean cumulative wear of 0.09mg per million cycles between 2 and 4 million cycles was detected in group 2, and this value was significantly lower (p=0.016) in comparison with the average value in group 1 (0.21mg per million cycle). This result can be explained in light of a possible transformation phase of zirconia in AMC liners, probably due to excessive stress during subluxation cycles. However, wear levels observed are close to the gravimetric measurement detection limit of the Sartorious Balance (about 0.1-0.2mg); therefore, wear can be considered negligible in all groups. CONCLUSION: Our results confirm that AMC couplings perform very well even in the worst-case wear scenario. Since AMC articulations revealed 25% lower cumulative wear respect to AMC on cross linked polyethylene in same simulator setup, AMC articulations should be considered the bearing of choice in revision surgery in light of the high risk of recurrent dislocations, instability, and third body wear. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III, prospective case-control study, in vitro.