Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in patients with nonmelancholic depressive disorders.

There is evidence of gender differences in depressive disorders in terms of epidemiology and clinical manifestations. However, few studies have addressed the gender differences in terms of antidepressant treatment response in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to examine gender differences in the acute antidepressant response to sertraline and imipramine in nonmelancholic depressive disorders. A total of 239 patients with nonmelancholic major depression or dysthymia (DSM-III-R) and a score of >/=18 at baseline on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D) were randomised in a 1:1 ratio treatment with flexible doses of sertraline (50-200 mg/day) or imipramine (75-225 mg/day) for 8 weeks in a multicenter, randomised, open-labeled, parallel group comparative trial. Depressive and anxiety symptoms were assessed using the HAM-D and the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A). Using HAM-D criteria, women were significantly more likely to respond to sertraline than to imipramine (72.2% vs. 52.1%, P=.008), whilst men respond similarly to sertraline and to imipramine (56.5% vs. 59.3%, P>.05). Response analysis based on HAM-A shows similar results (women: 68.9% vs. 43.6%, P=.001; men: 56.5% vs. 51.9%, P>.05). Women taking sertraline show statistically significant higher reductions in HAM-D, HAM-A, and in CGI-S than women taking imipramine. The proportion of women who dropped out due to adverse events was much lower in sertraline than in imipramine (10.9% vs. 27.8%, P=.006), with no differences between treatments in men (8.3% vs. 11.5%, P>.05). It was concluded that sertraline is more effective and better tolerated than imipramine in the acute treatment of nonmelancholic depressive disorders in women, whereas men responded similarly to sertraline and to imipramine.

Sertraline is more effective than imipramine in the treatment of non-melancholic depression: results from a multicentre, randomized study.

The acute treatment efficacy, tolerability, and effects on health-related quality of life of sertraline (50-200 mg/day) versus imipramine (75-225 mg/day) were compared in outpatients with non-melancholic depression. The study employed an open-label, parallel-group design. One hundred and sixteen patients were randomized to receive sertraline and 123 to receive imipramine for 8 weeks. In the intent-to-treat (ITT), last-observation-carried-forward (LOCF) analysis, sertraline produced statistically significantly greater improvements in depressive (21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale [HAM-D(21)] scores of 24.9 and 24.4 were reduced to 10.3 and 13.1 at endpoint, P<.005) and anxiety symptoms (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale [HAM-A] scores of 21.8 and 21.9 were reduced to 9.5 and 13.9, P<.01), as well as in response (69.0% versus 53.7% at endpoint, P=.016) and remission rates (51.3% versus 38.0% at endpoint, P=.041) from week 4 onwards compared with imipramine. The proportion of patients who were 'very much improved' or 'much improved' (Clinical Global Impressions Scale of Improvement [CGI-I] score of 1 or 2) was significantly higher at endpoint in the sertraline group (76.1%) than in the imipramine group (62.8%) (P=.028). At week 8, patients in both treatment groups showed clear improvements in quality of life, although nonstatistically significant differences were evident in the quality of life of sertraline- versus imipramine-treated patients. Sertraline was significantly superior in tolerability with less discontinuations due to adverse events (10.3%) compared with the imipramine group (24.4%) (P=.004). It was concluded that sertraline is more effective than imipramine in the acute treatment of depressive and anxiety symptoms in patients with non-melancholic depression.

Detección de trastornos mentales por médicos no psiquiatras: utilidad del cuestionario PRIME-MD / The detection of mental disorders by physicians who are not psychiatrists: usefulness of the PRIME-MD questionnaire

No disponible