Effect of triage-based use of the Ottawa foot and ankle rules on the number of orders for radiographic imaging.

CONTEXT: Reducing unnecessary testing lessens the cost burden of medical care, but decreasing use depends on consistently following evidence-based clinical decision rules. The Ottawa foot and ankle rules (OFARs) are validated, longstanding evidence-based guidelines to predict fractures. Frequently, radiography is automatically ordered for acute ankle injuries despite findings from OFARs suggesting no fracture. OBJECTIVES: First, to determine whether implementation of protocol-driven use of the OFARs at triage would decrease the number of radiography orders and length of stay (LOS) in the emergency department. Second, to quantify the incidence of OFARs use at triage and to assess patient expectations of radiography use and patient satisfaction as rated by both patients and clinicians. METHODS: In this prospective, 2-stage sequential pilot study, patients with acute ankle and foot injuries were screened in the emergency department between January 2013 and October 2013. In the first stage, clinicians (physician assistants, residents, and attending physicians) performed their usual practice habits for radiography use in the control group. For the second stage, they were educated to appropriately apply the OFARs before ordering radiography. For patients who were suspected of having a fracture at triage, nursing staff ordered radiography. For patients who were not suspected of having a fracture at triage, a clinician reassessed them using the OFARs after their triage assessment. Radiography was then ordered at the discretion of the clinician. Results gathered after training in the OFARs comprised the intervention group. After discharge, patients were surveyed regarding their expectations and satisfaction, and clinicians were surveyed on their perceptions of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: A total of 131 patients were screened, 62 patients were enrolled in the study after consent was obtained, and 2 patients withdrew from the study prematurely, leaving 30 patients in each group. Fifty-eight of the 60 patients (97%) underwent radiography. Emergency department LOS decreased from 103 minutes to 96.5 minutes (P=.297) after the OFARs were applied. There was also a decrease in LOS in patients with a fracture (137 minutes vs 103 minutes [P=.112]). Radiography was expected to be ordered by 27 of 30 patients in the control group (90%) and 24 of 30 in the intervention group (80%) (P=.472). Patients were equally satisfied among the groups (54 of 60 [90%]) (with no difference between groups), and 27 of 30 (90%) vs 30 of 30 (100%) clinicians in the control and intervention groups, respectively, perceived that patients were satisfied with their treatment. CONCLUSION: There was no statistical evidence that application of the OFARs decreases the number of imaging orders or decreases LOS. This observation suggests that even when clinicians are being observed and instructed to use clinical decision rules, their evaluation bias tends toward recommendations for testing.

I can't move my face! a case of bilateral facial palsy.

The authors present a case of bilateral facial palsy in a 52-year-old man. The patient presented to an emergency department in Pennsylvania, describing left-sided neck pain and headache from "sleeping wrong," symptoms which eventually progressed to facial diplegia by his fourth visit in 2 weeks. His admitting diagnosis was Bell palsy; he was ultimately tested for and found to have Lyme disease. Delay in treatment of patients with Lyme disease may lead to bilateral facial paralysis and disease progression. Thorough history taking, physical examination, and scrutiny of prior records are important elements of identifying and treating patients such as these (ie, whose vague symptoms progress to facial diplegia) appropriately.

Establishing a comprehensive networkwide pressure ulcer identification process.

BACKGROUND: Pressure ulcers (PUs) are a critical concern, endangering patients and requiring significant resources for treatment in Stage II/IV. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) denies reimbursement in cases where a more complex diagnosis-related group (DRG) is assigned as a result of hospital-acquired conditions such as a PU that could have been reasonably prevented. IMPLEMENTATION: An interdisciplinary PU present-on-admission (POA) team developed an algorithm to support the early identification of PUs for units participating in the process. This approach standardized work, resulting in consistent (1) skin assessment, (2) physician notification, (3) reporting of findings in the patient safety reporting system, and (4) communication to receiving units. Computer-entry tools were developed and completed for six months by the patient care services unit-based process improvement councils; these councils made possible immediate "loop closure" for either positive feedback or needed reeducation with the nursing staff. RESULTS: The total number of PUs recognized and reported after implementation of the process improvement initiative--from April 1, 2008, to March 31, 2009--increased to 1,103--an increase of 36.3% in PU reporting when compared with the same period the year before. This initiative has yielded 100% effectiveness in identifying Stage III/IV PUs POA and in preventing hospital-acquired Stage III/IV PUs. The success of the project has helped to ensure high-quality patient care and protection of precious fiscal resources. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the identification of all PUs that are present at time of admission is clinically feasible.