Examining the implementation of clinical practice guidelines for the management of adult cancers: A mixed methods study.

RATIONALE, AIMS, AND OBJECTIVES: Focusing on the implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the management of adult cancers, the objectives of this study were to (a) describe the intrinsic elements known to influence CPG use; (b) identify the ways in which CPGs are implemented; and (c) explore how CPG characteristics and contextual factors influence implementation and use. METHODS: We conducted a sequential mixed methods study. First, we performed a content analysis of all CPGs developed and approved for the management of adult cancers in Nova Scotia, Canada, from 2005 to 2015. CPGs were examined for the presence of 22 elements known to influence CPG use. Next, we conducted semistructured interviews with CPG developers and end users. Participants were purposively sampled, based on the findings of the content analysis. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed verbatim. Data were analysed by two researchers using the Framework Method. RESULTS: CPGs (n = 20) demonstrated large variation with respect to elements shown to influence CPG use. For example, 85% included content related to individualization and objectives. Yet no CPGs (0%) had journal or patient versions; discussed the education, training, or competencies needed to deliver recommendations; contained an explicit statement on anticipated work changes, or on potential direct or productivity costs; or identified barriers or facilitators that might influence CPG adoption. Interview data from CPG developers (n = 4) and users (n = 6) revealed five themes related to CPG implementation and use: (a) lack of consistency in CPG development; (b) timing and nature of stakeholder engagement; (c) credibility of the CPG development process and final CPGs; (d) limited understanding of implementation as an active process; and (e) factors at organizational and system levels influence CPG implementation and use. CONCLUSIONS: This mixed methods study provides complementary data that may help inform more effective CPG implementation efforts and optimize their use in practice.

Patterns of health care utilization preceding a colorectal cancer diagnosis are strong predictors of dying quickly following diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Understanding the predictors of a quick death following diagnosis may improve timely access to palliative care. The objective of this study was to explore whether factors in the 24 months prior to a colorectal cancer (CRC) diagnosis predict a quick death post-diagnosis. METHODS: Data were from a longitudinal study of all adult persons diagnosed with CRC in Nova Scotia, Canada, from 01Jan2001-31Dec2005. This study included all persons who died of any cause by 31Dec2010, except those who died within 30 days of CRC surgery (n = 1885 decedents). Classification and regression tree models were used to explore predictors of time from diagnosis to death for the following time intervals: 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, and 26 weeks from diagnosis to death. All models were performed with and without stage at diagnosis as a predictor variable. Clinico-demographic and health service utilization data in the 24 months pre-diagnosis were provided via linked administrative databases. RESULTS: The strongest, most consistent predictors of dying within 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks of CRC diagnosis were related to health services utilization in the 24 months prior to diagnosis: i.e., number of specialist visits, number of days spent in hospital, and number of family physician visits. Stage at diagnosis was the strongest predictor of dying within 12 and 26 weeks of diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Identifying potential predictors of a short timeframe between cancer diagnosis and death may aid in the development of strategies to facilitate timely and appropriate referral to palliative care upon a cancer diagnosis.

Self-reported practice patterns and knowledge of rectal cancer care among Canadian general surgeons.

BACKGROUND: Our objective was to examine the knowledge and treatment decision practice patterns of Canadian surgeons who treat patients with rectal cancer. METHODS: A mail survey with 6 questions on staging investigations, management of low rectal cancer, lymph node harvest, surgical margins and use of adjuvant therapies was sent to all general surgeons in Canada. Appropriate responses to survey questions were defined a priori. We compared survey responses according to surgeon training (colorectal/surgical oncology v. others) and geographic region (Atlantic, Central, West). RESULTS: The survey was sent to 2143 general surgeons; of the 1312 respondents, 703 treat patients with rectal cancer. Most surgeons responded appropriately to the questions regarding staging investigations (88%) and management of low rectal cancer (88%). Only 55% of surgeons correctly identified the recommended lymph node harvest as 12 or more nodes, 45% identified 5 cm as the recommended distal margin for upper rectal cancer, and 70% appropriately identified which patients should be referred for adjuvant therapy. Surgeons with subspecialty training were significantly more likely to provide correct responses to all of the survey questions than other surgeons. There was limited variation in responses according to geographic region. Subspecialty-trained surgeons and recent graduates were more likely to answer all of the survey questions correctly than other surgeons. CONCLUSION: Initiatives are needed to ensure that all surgeons who treat patients with rectal cancer, regardless of training, maintain a thorough and accurate knowledge of rectal cancer treatment issues.

CONTEXTE: Notre objectif était d'évaluer les connaissances et les processus décisionnels thérapeutiques des chirurgiens canadiens qui traitent des patients atteints de cancer rectal. MÉTHODES: Un sondage envoyé par la poste comportant 6 questions sur les épreuves de stadification, la prise en charge du cancer du bas rectum, le prélèvement des ganglions lymphatiques, les marges chirurgicales et l'utilisation de traitements adjuvants a été envoyé à tous les chirurgiens généraux au Canada. Les réponses appropriées aux questions du sondage avaient été définies au préalable. Nous avons comparé les réponses au sondage selon la formation des chirurgiens (oncologie colorectale/chirurgicale c. autres) et selon la région (Atlantique, Centre, Ouest). RÉSULTATS: Le sondage a été envoyé à 2143 chirurgiens généraux; parmi les 1312 répondants, 703 traitent des patients atteints de cancer rectal. La plupart des chirurgiens ont répondu de façon appropriée aux questions concernant les épreuves de stadification (88 %) et la prise en charge du cancer du bas rectum (88 %). Seulement 55 % des chirurgiens ont correctement répondu à la question sur le nombre optimal de ganglions lymphatiques à prélever, soit 12 ganglions ou plus, 45 % ont donné 5 cm comme marge distale recommandée pour le cancer du haut rectum et 70 % ont déterminé de manière appropriée quels patients il faut orienter vers un traitement adjuvant. Les chirurgiens qui avaient reçu une formation spécialisée étaient significativement plus susceptibles de fournir des réponses exactes à toutes les questions du sondage comparativement aux autres chirurgiens. On a noté une variation limitée entre les réponses selon les régions. Les chirurgiens spécialisés et les nouveaux diplômés étaient plus susceptibles de répondre correctement à toutes les questions du sondage comparativement aux autres chirurgiens. CONCLUSION: Des initiatives s'imposent pour s'assurer qu'indépendamment de leur formation tous les chirurgiens qui traitent des patients atteints d'un cancer rectal maintiennent des connaissances complètes et exactes sur les enjeux thérapeutiques entourant le cancer rectal.

Population-based use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer: is there room for improvement?

BACKGROUND: Treatment of rectal cancer in North America has been associated with lower rates of sphincter-preserving surgery in comparison with other regions. It is unclear if these lower rates are due to patient, tumor, or treatment factors; thus, the potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery is unknown. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to identify the factors associated with the use of sphincter-preserving surgery and to quantify the potential for an increase in sphincter preservation. DESIGN: This population-based retrospective cohort study used patient-level data collected through a comprehensive, standardized review of hospital inpatient and outpatient medical records and cancer center charts. SETTINGS: This study was conducted in all hospitals providing rectal cancer surgery in a Canadian province. PATIENTS: All patients with a new diagnosis of rectal cancer from July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2006 who underwent potentially curative radical surgery were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with receiving a permanent colostomy. Patients were categorized as having received an appropriate or potentially inappropriate colostomy based on a priori determined patient, tumor, operative, and pathologic criteria. RESULTS: Of 466 patients who underwent radical surgery, 48% received a permanent colostomy. There was significant variation in the rate of sphincter-preserving surgery among the 10 hospitals that provided rectal cancer care (12%-73%, p = 0.0001). On multivariate analysis, male sex, low tumor height, and increasing tumor stage were associated with the receipt of a permanent colostomy. Among patients who received a permanent stoma, 65 of 224 (29%) patients received a potentially inappropriate stoma. On multivariate analysis, male sex and treatment in a medium- or low-volume hospital was associated with the receipt of a potentially inappropriate colostomy. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the receipt of a permanent colostomy by many patients with rectal cancer may be inappropriate, and there is potential to increase the use of sphincter-preserving surgery in patients with rectal cancer.

Surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether surgeon knowledge contributes to the relationship between surgeon procedure volume and patient outcomes in rectal cancer. BACKGROUND: Although previous research has shown that treatment by high-volume surgeons is associated with improved outcomes among patients with rectal cancer, the mechanisms for such an association are not well understood. METHODS: In 2009, a mail survey with 8 questions pertaining to rectal cancer care was created, modified for content validity, and sent to all general surgeons in Nova Scotia, Canada. Patients with rectal cancer, who were treated by the survey respondents between July 1, 2002, and June 30, 2006, were identified retrospectively, and a comprehensive standardized review of medical records was used to collect outcome data for this population-based cohort. The association between surgeon survey score (dichotomized into high- and low-score groups on the basis of the median score), surgeon procedure volume, and patient outcomes was examined. RESULTS: Of 521 patients who underwent treatment with curative intent from July 1, 2002, to June 30, 2006, 377 patients (72%) were treated by 25 surgeons who responded to the survey. After controlling for patient and tumor factors, patients treated by high-volume surgeons were more likely to receive a total mesorectal excision (TME) [odds ratio (OR) = 3.89; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.20-5.83], more likely to undergo an adequate lymph node harvest (OR = 3.67; 95%CI, 2.36-5.70), less likely to have a permanent colostomy (OR = 0.53; 95%CI, 0.30-0.93), and less likely to develop local recurrence (HR = 0.54; 95%CI, 0.29-0.99). When surgeon survey score was included in the multivariate regression models, the relationship between surgeon procedure volume and permanent colostomy was diminished. There was a significant interaction between surgeon survey score and surgeon volume for the outcomes of use of TME (P < 0.01) and local recurrence (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that surgeon knowledge may, at least in part, explain surgeon volume-associated differences in rectal cancer outcomes.

Timely access and quality of care in colorectal cancer: are they related?

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer patients want both timely access and high-quality care. The objective of this study was to explore relationships between quality indicators and access time intervals specific to colorectal cancer patients. DESIGN: Prospective consecutive cohort study. SETTING: Single health district. PARTICIPANTS: Between February 2002 and February 2004, all patients undergoing non-emergent surgery for primary colorectal cancer were enrolled. INTERVENTION: A standardized method was used to collect clinicodemographic, diagnostic and treatment event data. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Associations between accepted colorectal cancer-specific quality indicators and benchmarked access time intervals for diagnosis, surgery and adjuvant therapy were examined using multivariate logistic regression, controlling for clinicodemographic factors. RESULTS: Among the 392 patients in the study cohort, 9.9% were diagnosed on screening examination, 53.1% underwent preoperative staging imaging and 74.5% underwent full preoperative colonic examination. On multivariate logistic regression, patients presenting via screening were more likely to move from presentation to diagnosis within the 4-week benchmark for this access time interval, compared with symptomatic patients (RR 8.1, P < 0.001). The absence of preoperative staging imaging was associated with achievement of the 4-week benchmark for the access time interval from diagnosis to surgery (RR 2.5, P < 0.001). Similarly, an absence of complete preoperative colonic examination was associated with achievement of the 8-week benchmark for the access time interval from surgery to adjuvant therapy (RR 6.6, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Although several associations between quality indicators and benchmarked access time intervals for colorectal cancer patients were identified, the relationship between quality and access is complex and far from universal. It is therefore clear that quality care and timely access are not synonymous, and that both must be studied to improve colorectal cancer care.

Surgical site infections following colorectal surgery in patients with diabetes: association with postoperative hyperglycemia.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative glycemic control reduces sternal infections following cardiac surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM). The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between postoperative glycemic control and surgical site infections (SSI) in patients with DM undergoing colorectal resection. DISCUSSION: A cohort of patients with DM who underwent colorectal resection (April 2001-May 2006) at our institution were reviewed. SSI were defined by Centers for Disease Control criteria. From a study cohort of 149 patients, 24% had poor postoperative glycemic control (defined as a mean 48-h postoperative capillary glucose (MCG) >11.0 mmol/L or 200 mg/dL), and these patients developed SSI at a significantly higher rate than those with a 48-h MCG < or =11.0 mmol/L (29.7% vs. 14.3%; odds ratio (OR) 2.5, p = 0.03). On multivariate logistic regression, 48-h MCG >11.0 mmol/L was significantly associated with SSI (OR 3.6, p = 0.02), independent of the dose and regimen of postoperative insulin administration. In conclusion, 48-h MCG >11.0 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) was independently associated with increased SSI following colorectal resection in patients with DM. Prospective studies are required to validate this relationship, address the role of preoperative glycemic control, and examine strategies to improve glycemic control following colorectal resection.

Increasing negative lymph node count is independently associated with improved long-term survival in stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of the number of negative lymph nodes on survival in patients with stage III colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent surgery for stage III colon cancer between January 1988 and December 1997 were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results cancer registry. The number of negative and positive nodes was determined for 20,702 eligible patients. Disease-specific survival was examined by substage according to the number of negative nodes identified. A proportional hazards model was constructed to determine the effect of the number of negative nodes on survival. RESULTS: For stage IIIB and IIIC patients, there was a significant decrease in disease-specific mortality as the number of negative nodes increased; cumulative 5-year cancer mortality was 27% in stage IIIB patients with 13 or more negative nodes identified versus 45% in those with three or fewer negative lymph nodes evaluated (P < .0001). In patients with stage IIIC cancer, those with 13 or more negative nodes had a 5-year mortality of 42% versus 65% in those with three or fewer negative lymph nodes evaluated (P < .0001). There was no association between the number of negative nodes identified and disease-specific survival for patients with stage IIIA disease. After controlling for the number of positive nodes, a higher number of negative nodes was found to be independently associated with improved disease-specific survival. CONCLUSION: The number of negative nodes is an important independent prognostic factor for patients with stage IIIB and IIIC colon cancer.

Adequacy of nodal harvest in colorectal cancer: a consecutive cohort study.

The presence of nodal metastasis is a critical component of staging in colorectal cancer. Accurate assessment of nodal status requires sufficient node sampling, although the number of such nodes is controversial, with recommendations ranging from 6 to 17 nodes. The purpose of this study was to describe the nodal harvest in colorectal cancer and to identify factors associated with adequate lymph node harvest. Pathology reports from consecutive patients with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer undergoing resection between January 1997 and December 2000 at a tertiary care academic institution were reviewed. Identification of 12 or more lymph nodes was considered to be an adequate nodal harvest based on the current American Joint Committee on Cancer recommendations. Among the 579 consecutive specimens, the number of nodes identified was not stated for 10 (1.7%). Of the remaining 569 specimens, 4700 nodes were identified with a mean of 8.3 nodes per patient (median 7, range 0 to 60). Nodal metastases were identified in 219 patients (38.5%). Patients with one or more positive nodes had greater nodal harvest than those with negative nodes (9.5 vs. 8.2, respectively; P = 0.03). Only 22.4% of patients were found to have an adequate nodal harvest (> or =12 nodes). Right-sided resections, high surgeon volume, and gross examination of specimens by a staff pathologist were associated with higher nodal harvests, compared to left-sided resections, low surgeon volume, and gross examination of specimens by a pathology resident/technologist, respectively. There was no association with pathologist volume. In this study, nodal harvest in patients undergoing resection for colorectal cancer was highly variable. This problem appears to be multifactorial, and is related to patient, pathologic, and surgical factors.