Mitigation of enteric methane emissions through improving efficiency of energy utilization and productivity in lactating dairy cows.

The data set used in the present study was obtained from 20 energy metabolism studies involving 579 lactating dairy cows (511 Holstein-Friesian, 36 Norwegian Red, and 32 Jersey-Holstein crossbreds) varying in genetic merit, lactation number, stage of lactation, and live weight. These cows were offered diets based on grass silage (n=550) or fresh grass (n=29), and their energy intake and outputs, including methane energy (CH(4)-E), were measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeter chambers. The objective was to use these data to evaluate relationships between CH(4)-E output and a range of factors in animal production and energetic efficiency in lactating dairy cows under normal feeding regimens. The CH(4)-E as a proportion of milk energy output (E(l)), E(l) adjusted to zero energy balance (E(l(0))), or intakes of gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE), or metabolizable energy (ME) was significantly related to a wide range of variables associated with milk production (E(l) and E(l(0))) and energy parameters (energy intake, metabolizability, partitioning, and utilization efficiencies). Three sets of linear relationships were developed with experimental effects removed. The CH(4)-E/GE intake (r(2)=0.50-0.62) and CH(4)-E/E(l) (r(2)=0.41-0.68) were reduced with increasing feeding level, E(l)/metabolic body weight (MBW; kg(0.75)), E(l(0))/MBW, GE intake/MBW, DE intake/MBW, and ME intake/MBW. Increasing dietary ME/DE decreased CH(4)-E/E(l) (r(2)=0.46) and CH(4)-E/GE intake (r(2)=0.72). Dietary ME concentration and ME/GE were also negatively related to CH(4)-E/GE intake (r(2)=0.47). However, increasing heat production/ME intake increased CH(4)-E as a proportion of E(l) (r(2)=0.41), E(l(0)) (r(2)=0.67) and energy intake (GE, DE, and ME; r(2)=0.62 and 0.70). These proportional CH(4)-E variables were reduced with increasing ratios of E(l)/ME intake and E(l(0))/ME intake and efficiency of ME use for lactation (r(2)=0.49-0.70). Fitting CH(4)-E/E(l) or CH(4)-E/E(l(0)) against these energetic efficiencies in quadratic rather than linear relationships significantly increased r(2) values (0.49-0.67 vs. 0.59-0.87). In conclusion, CH(4)-E as a proportion of energy intake (GE, DE, and ME) and milk production (E(l) and E(l(0))) can be reduced by increasing milk yield and energetic efficiency of milk production or by reducing energy expenditure for maintenance. The selection of dairy cows with high energy utilization efficiencies and milk productivity offers an effective approach to reducing enteric CH(4) emission rates.

Prediction of methane emission from beef cattle using data measured in indirect open-circuit respiration calorimeters.

The objectives of the present study were to examine relationships between methane (CH4) output and animal and dietary factors, and to use these relationships to develop prediction equations for CH4 emission from beef cattle. The dataset was obtained from 108 growing-to-finishing beef steers in five studies and CH4 production and energy metabolism data were measured in indirect respiration calorimeter chambers. Dietary forage proportion ranged from 29.5% to 100% (dry matter (DM) basis) and forages included grass silage, fresh grass, dried grass and fodder beet. Linear and multiple regression techniques were used to examine relationships between CH4 emission and animal and dietary variables, with the effects of experiment or forage type removed. Total CH4 emission was positively related to live weight (LW), feeding level and intake of feed (DM and organic matter) and energy (gross energy (GE), digestible energy (DE) and metabolisable energy (ME)) (P < 0.001), while CH4/DM intake (DMI) was negatively related to energy digestibility and ME/GE (P < 0.05 or less). Using LW alone to predict CH4 emission produced a poor relationship when compared to DMI and GE intake (GEI) (R2 = 0.26 v. 0.68 and 0.70 respectively). Adding feeding level, dietary NDF concentration and CP/ME or feeding level, energy digestibility and ME/GE to support LW resulted in a R2 of 0.66 or 0.84. The high R2 (0.84) was similar to that obtained using DMI or GEI together with energy digestibility and ME/GE as predictors. Further inclusion of dietary forage proportion and ADF and NDF concentration to the multiple relationships using GEI as the primary predictor resulted in a R2 of 0.87. These equations were evaluated through internal validation, by developing a range of similar new equations from two-thirds of the present data and then validating these new equations with the remaining one-third of data. The validation indicated that addition of energy digestibility and ME/GE to support LW with feeding level, DMI and GEI considerably increased the prediction accuracy. It is concluded that CH4 emission of beef steers can be accurately predicted from LW plus feeding level, DMI or GEI together with energy digestibility and ME/GE. The dataset was also used to validate a range of prediction equations for CH4 production of cattle published elsewhere.

Relationships between urea dilution measurements and body weight and composition of lactating dairy cows.

The objective of the present study was to investigate the potential of the urea dilution technique, coupled with live animal measures to predict the body components of dairy cattle. The study involved 104 lactating Holstein-Friesian cows offered grass silage-based diets. Urea space volume (USV) was calculated from 2 collection periods of blood samples following infusion of urea at 12 (USV12, kg) and 30 (USV30, kg) min after infusion, and then as a proportion of live weight (LW) or empty body weight (EBW). All cows were slaughtered within 2 d of the USV trials. Large ranges existed in EBW and empty body concentrations of water, crude protein (CP), lipid, ash, and gross energy (GE). The USV12 and USV30 were both positively related to LW, EBW, and empty body component weights. The r2 values for USV12 were greater than USV30. The r2 values in the relationships of EBW and empty body composition with USV, however, were smaller than those with LW. Nevertheless, the relationships were improved when both USV and LW were used as predictors, rather than using either alone. Adding milk yield and body condition score as supporting predictors to prediction equations using USV and LW data for EBW, lipid, and GE contents further improved the relationships (r2 = 0.93, 0.66, and 0.77, respectively). Internal evaluation of one-third of the present data using equations developed from two-thirds of the present data indicated that using USV, live weight, and other live animal variables as predictors, rather than using USV alone, considerably improved the prediction accuracy. It was concluded that USV can be used to predict body composition, but the relationships with USV were poorer than those with LW. The USV can only be used as a supporting variable to live weight for prediction of body components in lactating dairy cows.

Thoracic epidural versus patient-controlled analgesia in elective bowel resections.

BACKGROUND: This study was undertaken to determine if thoracic epidural analgesia is of practical benefit after bowel resection. METHODS: Patients were prospectively randomized to receive either a thoracic epidural or patient-controlled analgesia for pain control after bowel resection. A standardized postoperative protocol was instituted after surgery. RESULTS: Pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group. Return of bowel function, and interval to discharge was not different between groups. Cost and complication rates were significantly higher in the epidural group. CONCLUSIONS: Although pain scores were significantly lower in the epidural group, this did not translate into a quicker return of bowel function or earlier discharge of the patient. Furthermore, the epidural group had a significantly higher complication rate and cost. Therefore, while thoracic epidural analgesia provides superior pain control, it does not offer a significant advantage over patient-controlled analgesia in return of bowel function after bowel resection.

Effect of forage digestibility and type of concentrate on nutrient utilization by lactating dairy cattle.

Six lactating dairy cows were used in a three period, part balanced changeover design experiment to investigate the effects of forage digestibility and concentrate composition on the efficiency of nutrient utilization in lactating dairy cows. Six treatments comprising three forage regimens and two concentrate types (starch v. fibre) were examined in a 3 x 2 factorial design. The three forage regimens were high digestibility grass silage offered ad lib. (HA) or restricted to 6.5 kg dry matter/d (HR) and a low digestibility grass silage offered ad lib. (LA). Within each forage regimen animals were offered 10 kg/d of supplements containing either high-starch or high-fibre concentrations. Experimental periods lasted 28 d with a 10 d recording period, during which animal performance, ration digestibility and nitrogen and energy utilization were measured. Respiratory exchange measurements were made over a 72 h period using indirect open-circuit calorimetry. Throughout the experiment, there were no significant forage x concentrate interactions in any of the intake, production or nutrient utilization results. Milk yield was significantly influenced by forage regimen (24.1, 21.7 and 21.9 kg/d for HA, HR and LA respectively) and concentrate type (21.6 and 23.5 kg/d for high-starch and high-fibre respectively). Concentrate type also significantly influenced milk protein concentration (32.8 and 30.9 g/kg for high-starch and high-fibre respectively). Forage regimen significantly influenced the efficiency of utilization of metabolizable energy (ME) for milk production (k1) with values of 0.62, 0.64 and 0.59 for HA, HR and LA respectively. Concentrate type had no significant effect on ME intake, heat production or k1, although animals receiving the high-fibre concentrates synthesized proportionately 0.11 more milk energy per unit of available energy (ME intake--heat production) than those receiving the high-starch concentrates. Interpolation of the values obtained with the two high digestibility forage regimens indicated that at similar ME intakes there was a trend towards a higher k1 with the diet based on high digestibility silage, and this was in line with the higher metabolizability of the overall diet with this silage.

Hygroma renalis: two cases within a family and a literature review.

Hygroma renalis is an unusual benign tumor of the kidney. Only 24 cases have been reported previously in the world literature; 22 of these patients underwent nephrectomy. Two sisters, with the first known occurrence in siblings, are discussed and the world literature is reviewed. Our first patient underwent nephrectomy for complications of hygroma in the face of a concern for a renal malignancy, but a high index of suspicion for hygroma enabled the second sibling to undergo a less radical operation, with sparing of the renal parenchyma and function. Both patients have been followed up for more than 3 years, with no evidence of recurrence of the neoplasm. Computed tomography was effective in delineating the nature and extent of disease in both patients and was instrumental in allowing conservative management of the second patient. Renal hygroma is a benign neoplasm treated adequately with conservative management and can be identified by its characteristic appearance on computed tomography. Operation should be reserved for the complications of hygroma. When operation is undertaken, resection of the hygroma without nephrectomy is adequate; radical operation is contraindicated in the management of these patients.