Predictors of success of methotrexate treatment in women with tubal ectopic pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: The use of methotrexate for the treatment of women with tubal ectopic pregnancies is now common practice. However, the clinical and hormonal determinants of the success of this treatment are not known. METHODS: We studied 350 women with tubal ectopic pregnancies who were treated with methotrexate intramuscularly according to a single-dose protocol. Pretreatment serum concentrations of human chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone, the size and volume of the gestational mass, fetal cardiac activity, and the presence of fluid (presumably blood) in the peritoneal cavity were correlated with the efficacy of therapy, as defined by resolution of the ectopic pregnancy without the need for surgical intervention. RESULTS: There was no relation between the women's age or parity, the size or volume of the conceptus, or the presence of fluid in the peritoneal cavity and the efficacy of treatment. Among the 320 women in whom treatment was successful (91 percent), the mean (+/-SD) serum chorionic gonadotropin and progesterone concentrations were 4019+/-6362 mIU per milliliter and 6.9+/-6.7 ng per milliliter (21.9+/-21.3 nmol per liter), respectively, as compared with 13,420+/-16,590 mIU per milliliter and 10.2+/-5.5 ng per milliliter (32.4+/-17.5 nmol per liter) (P<0.001 and P=0.02) in the 30 women in whom treatment was not successful. Fetal cardiac activity was present in 12 percent of the successfully treated cases and 30 percent of those in which treatment was not successful (P=0.01). Regression analysis revealed the pretreatment serum chorionic gonadotropin concentration to be the only factor that contributed to the failure rate. CONCLUSIONS: Among women with tubal ectopic pregnancies, a high serum chorionic gonadotropin concentration is the most important factor associated with failure of treatment with a single-dose methotrexate protocol.

A randomized, double-blinded trial of preemptive analgesia in laparoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: We tested the hypothesis that local anesthetic administered before skin incision, an example of preemptive analgesia, reduces postoperative pain for women undergoing laparoscopy, as compared with postincisional local anesthetic or placebo. METHODS: Patients undergoing diagnostic laparoscopy were randomized to one of three blinded treatment groups. Treatment group A patients received local infiltration of 0.5% bupivacaine at the surgical site before incision and a saline placebo infiltration before incision closure. Treatment group B received the saline placebo before skin incision and bupivacaine after laparoscopy but before closure of the skin incisions. For treatment group C patients, saline was infiltrated as a placebo before and after laparoscopy. All patients underwent a standardized general anesthetic induction and maintenance. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the modified McGill Present Pain Intensity scale. Pain and supplementary analgesic use was compared among the three treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 57 patients completed the study for analysis. Age, weight, height, race, indication, and operating time did not vary significantly between the three groups. By 24 hours after surgery, patients in treatment group A reported significantly lower pain scores (McGill Present Pain Intensity Scale: 0.5+/-0.9) than either treatment group B (1.6+/-1.3) or C (1.3+/-1.2). Group A patients also could tolerate a significantly longer time delay to their first analgesic medication than patients who received postincisional bupivacaine or than control patients who received no bupivacaine. CONCLUSION: The preemptive administration of bupivacaine before laparoscopy results in decreased postoperative pain and should allow a more rapid return to normal activities. The popular practice of infiltrating bupivacaine at time of incision closure does not offer any benefit in the control of pain after laparoscopy.