RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to analyse the proportion of evidence-based medication displayed in pharmacies and compare it between the different linguistic regions of the country, at different times of the year to determine the amount of proven effective medications indirectly recommended to the public in different parts of Switzerland. DESIGN: This is an observational study conducted by medical doctors in the department of internal medicine at the Spitalzentrum Biel, Switzerland. SETTING: The observation took place from July 2019 to May 2020. From a total of 1800 pharmacies in Switzerland, 68 different pharmacies were selected across the 3 main linguistic regions and the medication on display in their windows were examined 4 times a year regarding their efficacy. The displays of medication with or without evidence-based efficacy were described using absolute numbers and proportions and compared between the different linguistic regions at different seasons using χ2. PARTICIPANTS: There were no human or animal participants involved in this study. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the proportion of medication displayed in pharmacy windows with a proven effectiveness in medical literature. The secondary outcome was the variability of the primary outcome over time (seasonal changes), over the different linguistic regions of Switzerland and between chains and privately owned pharmacies. RESULTS: We examined 970 medications and found that over the whole year, there is a high proportion of non-evidence-based drugs (56,9%) displayed in pharmacies. Swiss German cantons display significantly more non-evidence-based medications in winter. We found no statistical difference for other seasons or between chains and privately owned pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Pharmacies in Switzerland tend to display significantly more non-evidence-based drugs, thus indirectly recommending them to the public. In a time of necessary expansion of self-medication by the population, this could incite consumers to buy drugs without proven effectiveness.
Assuntos
Farmácias , Farmácia , Humanos , Publicidade , Medicina Baseada em Evidências , SuíçaRESUMO
Discovered in 1977, Hepatitis D is the most severe form of chronic hepatitis, with rapid development of cirrhosis, hepatic failure and hepatocellular carcinoma. Despite all this, it is still largely underdiagnosed and there is no standardised management. The current treatment options are scarce and bear frequent side-effects, but the early diagnosis and an optimal follow-up with identification of the patients suitable for treatment improve significantly their survival rate and quality of life. Moreover, new promising treatments are entering phase III trials and offer new perspectives for our patients.
Découvert en 1977, le virus de l'hépatite D (VHD) est responsable de la forme la plus sévère des hépatites chroniques, avec une évolution rapide vers la cirrhose, la défaillance hépatique et le carcinome hépatocellulaire. Pourtant, le VHD est encore largement sous-diagnostiqué et la prise en charge peu standardisée. Malgré un traitement actuel sous-optimal et lourd, un diagnostic précoce, un suivi rapproché et l'identification des personnes à traiter permettent d'améliorer leur qualité de vie et d'allonger la survie. En outre, de nouveaux traitements prometteurs entrent en études de phase III, auxquelles participent également des centres suisses, ouvrant de nouvelles perspectives pour nos patients.
