Feasibility of Interleukin-6 Receptor Blockade in Cardiac Antibody-mediated Rejection.

BACKGROUND: Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains a significant cause of heart transplant mortality with few effective therapies. METHODS: This study aimed to describe initial experience of using interleukin-6 receptor blockade with tocilizumab in the treatment of acute cardiac AMR at Barnes-Jewish Hospital/Washington University Transplant Center from July 2017 to May 2021 (n = 7). Clinical, echocardiographic, and serum alloantibody data were analyzed before and after treatment. RESULTS: All participants demonstrated marked improvement in functional status. Echocardiographic data following 4-6 mo of tocilizumab revealed significant improvements in biventricular systolic function for all participants. Consistent reductions in donor-specific HLA or angiotensin type I receptor antibodies were not observed, suggesting that tocilizumab may act downstream of antibody production. No patient experienced drug-related complications that necessitated discontinuation of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide initial insights into the safety and efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor blockade in the treatment of cardiac AMR and support the design of larger prospective studies.

Efficacy and Safety of Tocilizumab in the Treatment of Acute Active Antibody-mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to have a deleterious impact on kidney allograft survival. Recent evidence supports use of tocilizumab for treatment of chronic active AMR, but it has not been assessed for treatment of acute active AMR. METHODS: We performed a single-center, observational study of kidney transplant recipients who received at least 1 dose of tocilizumab in addition to conventional therapies for acute active AMR between October 2016 and October 2018 with follow-up through August 2019. RESULTS: Seven patients were included. All 7 patients received tocilizumab 8 mg/kg (max dose, 800 mg) monthly. We noted a 50% or greater reduction in immunodominant donor-specific antibodies in 4 of 6 patients. Renal function improved or stabilized in all patients throughout the duration of therapy. One patient developed cytomegalovirus esophagitis and 1 had a potential hypersensitivity reaction. In the extended follow-up, 1 patient had mixed rejection and 2 patients had T-cell-mediated rejection, which occurred 6 to 24 mo after completion of therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab may be considered as an addition to conventional therapies for treatment of acute active AMR. More studies are needed to determine which patients may benefit from therapy and to examine the appropriate duration of treatment.

Influence of pretransplant midodrine use on outcomes after kidney transplantation.

Evaluation of potential kidney transplant recipients is important to identify and treat conditions that may influence graft or patient survival after transplantation. We performed a single-center, observational cohort study to determine whether pretransplant midodrine use influences outcomes after kidney transplantation. We analyzed graft and patient outcomes for adult patients who underwent a kidney-only transplantation at Barnes-Jewish Hospital from January 1999 to December 2015. We quantified adjusted associations of pretransplant midodrine use with post-transplant complications by multivariable Cox regression. Among the 2621 kidney transplant recipients analyzed, 37 (1.4%) were taking midodrine immediately prior to transplantation. Midodrine users were more commonly older (56.5 vs 50.4 years) and obese (67.6% vs 33.6%). Midodrine users were also more likely to be on hemodialysis (86.5% vs 59.2%), to have a longer duration of dialysis dependence (646 months vs 577 months), and to have higher levels of sensitization (peak panel reactive antibody >20%, 32.4% vs 15.8%) compared to nonusers. Pretransplant midodrine users had significantly higher rates of delayed graft function (DGF) (32.4% vs 6.7%, P < 0.001). No difference in the incidence of DGF was observed based on the midodrine dosing regimen. After multivariable adjustment for recipient and donor characteristics, pretransplant midodrine use was independently associated with graft failure at 1 year (adjusted hazard ratio, 5.11; 95% confidence interval, 2.09-12.49).

Effects of recurrent urinary tract infections on graft and patient outcomes after kidney transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common following kidney transplantation (KT); however, the influence of recurrent post-KT UTI (R-UTI) is not well-characterized. METHODS: We compared graft outcomes, patient outcomes and multidrug-resistance rates between patients with no UTI, nonrecurrent UTI (NR-UTI) (urine sample containing >105 bacterial colony-forming units/mL) and R-UTI (≥2 UTIs in any 6-month period or ≥3 UTIs in any 12-month period) post-KT in a retrospective cohort study (1999-2014) at Barnes-Jewish Hospital (St Louis, MO). All adult KT recipients were included and those experiencing mortality within 30 days of KT were excluded. RESULTS: Of 2469 recipients included, 1835 (74.3%) had no UTI, 465 (18.8%) had NR-UTI and 169 (6.8%) had R-UTI. R-UTI was associated with poorer graft survival compared with NR-UTI [hazard ratio (HR) 1.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-1.83; P < 0.001) and no UTI (HR 2.11; 95% CI 2.02-3.80; P < 0.001). This relationship persisted after adjusting for confounding factors in Cox regression (HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.53-2.66; P < 0.001). There was no difference in patient survival between no UTI and NR-UTI (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.91-1.63; P = 0.181); however, R-UTI was associated with poorer patient survival compared with nonrecurrent cases (HR 1.87; 95% CI 1.21-2.89; P = 0.005). R-UTI were more likely to be caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative organisms (risk ratio 1.49; 95% CI 1.31-1.70; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: R-UTIs were associated with poorer graft and patient outcomes, as well as increased multidrug-resistance compared with nonrecurrent cases.

Vaccinations in asplenic adults.

PURPOSE: The recommended immunizations for adult asplenic patients are reviewed. SUMMARY: Patients without a spleen are at risk of developing overwhelming postsplenectomy infections due to encapsulated organisms, mainly pneumococcal, meningococcal, and Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib). Due to the high mortality rates associated with these infections, vaccinations are recommended as a preventive measure. It is challenging to ensure optimal immunizations in these high-risk patients due to the number of recommended vaccines, the availability of multiple formulations, and the inability to administer specific formulations at the same time, as well as differences in subsequent vaccine administration schedules. Pharmacists play a key role in recommending specific vaccines and timing for these patients in order to achieve the most robust immune response. This article reviews the specific recommendations for pneumococcal, meningococcal, Hib, and influenza vaccinations in asplenic patients. CONCLUSION: In order to prevent potentially life-threatening infections, asplenic individuals should be vaccinated against S. pneumoniae, N. meningitidis, Hib, and influenza. The optimal timing of vaccination in relation to splenectomy depends on the nature of the splenectomy.