Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(16)2024 Apr 15.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704723

RESUMO

Spinal anaesthesia is considered an effective and safe method for providing pain relief during procedures below the waist. However, in a small subset of patients, life-threatening vasovagal reactions may develop leading to severe bradycardia and hypotension or ultimately asystole and complete circulatory collapse. Early recognition and prompt treatment of this condition can be lifesaving as illustrated in this case report where the patient developed asystole for ten seconds shortly after placing the spinal anaesthetic.


Assuntos
Raquianestesia , Parada Cardíaca , Humanos , Raquianestesia/efeitos adversos , Bradicardia/diagnóstico , Bradicardia/terapia , Parada Cardíaca/terapia , Síncope Vasovagal/diagnóstico , Síncope Vasovagal/etiologia
2.
Neuromodulation ; 25(5): 700-709, 2022 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35396190

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a surgical treatment modality reserved for a subset of patients with neuropathic pain in which conventional pharmacologic treatment has proven insufficient. Previous studies have suggested a possible negative relationship between opioid use at referral and subsequent success of SCS therapy. The aim of this cohort study was to investigate whether preoperative opioid use was associated with inferior SCS outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were obtained from the Danish Neurizon Neuromodulation Database and comprised preoperative registrations of analgesic use, postoperative Patients' Global Impression of Change (PGIC) ratings, pre- and postoperative pain intensity scores (Numeric Rating Scale), and detailed surgical data. Patients were dichotomized according to preoperative opioid use (users vs nonusers) with subsequent assessment of the latest PGIC rating, reduction in pain intensity, and current treatment status (implanted/explanted). In addition, daily preoperative opioid dosages were quantified in oral morphine equivalents (OME) and correlated to the treatment outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 467 patients were included; 296 consumed opioids before SCS implantation (median 80 OME/d). Preoperative opioid use was not associated with the latest PGIC rating, reduction in pain intensity (30% or 50%), or risk of undergoing explantation (median follow-up = 3.0 years). Likewise, preoperative median OME per day of opioid users was not correlated with any of the defined outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative opioid usage did not predict the outcome of SCS therapy in a large cohort of patients permanently implanted with an SCS system. The results do not support withholding otherwise well-indicated SCS therapy in patients with chronic neuropathic pain conditions based merely on preoperative opioid usage.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Neuralgia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapêutico , Dor Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Neuralgia/tratamento farmacológico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/tratamento farmacológico , Medula Espinal , Estimulação da Medula Espinal/métodos , Resultado do Tratamento
3.
Neuromodulation ; 24(1): 76-85, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32929834

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an important treatment modality used to treat chronic neuropathic pain. However, reported success rates of 26%-70% entail an increased focus on patient selection. An area of core interest is psychological evaluation, often using scales such as the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The aim of this study was to assess the relation between baseline PCS scores obtained before implantation and SCS outcomes defined as (1) Rating on Patients' Global Impression of Change scale (PGIC), (2) Pain relief on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), (3) Cessation of pain medication, and (4) Risk of permanent explantation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using records from the Neurizon Neuromodulation Database, we performed a multicenter open cohort study of 259 permanently implanted SCS patients. Follow-up ranged from six months to nine years (median = three years). For each of the defined SCS outcomes, patients were grouped according to their latest follow-up registration. Subsequently, we used a one-way ANOVA and exact t-tests to compare mean baseline PCS scores between groups. RESULTS: No difference in mean baseline PCS scores was found between PGIC groups. Baseline PCS scores was not associated with the probability of obtaining 30% or 50% pain relief on latest registration. Baseline PCS scores of patients able to cease all usage of tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptics, or opioids during SCS treatment did not differ from baseline scores of continuous users. We found no association between baseline PCS scores and risk of permanent explantation. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate any associations between baseline PCS scores and SCS outcomes.


Assuntos
Dor Crônica , Estimulação da Medula Espinal , Catastrofização , Dor Crônica/terapia , Estudos de Coortes , Seguimentos , Humanos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...