[Couder's maneuver. Knowledge and practices in a French university maternity hospital]. / Manœuvre de Couder. Connaissances et pratiques dans une maternité universitaire française.

BACKGROUND: During childbirth, the performance of a systematic Couder's maneuver could be linked to a reduction in the risk of perineal tear. OBJECTIVE: To know the practices and knowledge of childbirth professionals regarding the Couder's maneuver. To measure the effect of a training program for juniors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-center questionnaire survey of senior and junior obstetricians and midwives. Before-and-after study in juniors to evaluate maneuver training. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-five caregivers responded to the questionnaire: (19 physicians and 46 senior midwives; 21 residents and 39 midwifery students). Only one third of the respondents said they practiced the Couder's maneuver "always or almost always" (41/125, 32.8%) and less than one third felt "very comfortable" with the maneuver (34/125, 27.2%), with large differences according to profession and senior vs junior status. Being a doctor (vs midwife) was significantly related to systematic or frequent practice of the maneuver (70.0 vs 15.3%, ORMH=42.7 [9.4; 192.3]) as was being a senior (vs junior) (46.2 vs 18.3%, ORMH=15.9 [3.5; 72.9]). Less than half of the seniors surveyed had received education in maneuvering. Of those who did not practice the maneuver, the majority did not consider its systematic practice to be useful (19/26, 73.1%), and one third considered it potentially harmful (8/26, 30.8%). Theoretical and practical training of the juniors significantly improved their knowledge. CONCLUSION: There are great differences in the practice of the Couder's maneuver. It deserves to be better known, practiced and evaluated.

[Intrauterine tamponade: Practices and training assessment]. / Tamponnement intra-utérin : description des pratiques et de la formation des internes.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to describe the practices of a French center regarding the use of intrauterine tamponade. The secondary objective was to describe the training of residents in the use of intrauterine tamponade (IUT). METHODS: This was a practice survey conducted through an anonymous quiz sent to residents in France between May 1, 2018 and July 1, 2019. Responses from first year residents were excluded. The data concerned the practices of the centers (mode of delivery, mode of insertion, ultrasound control, use of vaginal gauze or antibiotic prophylaxis) as well as the feeling of the residents concerning their training in using of the intrauterine tamponade (frequency, training sessions, learning difficulties). RESULTS: We obtained 145 responses to represent all regions of France. Responses from 27/28 centres were obtained. All the centres use it during cesarean section and after vaginal delivery. Vaginal gauze is used in 74% of cases and 65% use antibiotic prophylaxis. A specific training during the residentship is described in only 26% of cases and 21% of residents say they have never used an IUT. CONCLUSION: Intrauterine tamponade is a technique widely used in France, regardless of the mode of delivery. The training of residents is essential, especially since the simulation is perfectly adapted to the learning for using intrauterine tamponade.

[Perineal risk and obstetrical protection: A survey with birth professionals]. / Risque périnéal et mesures de protection obstétricale : enquête auprès des professionnels de la naissance.

OBJECTIVES: The main objective was to evaluate the practices declared by birth professionals in the Lorraine region about perineal obstetric protection (any perineal tear combined). The secondary objective was to evaluate prevention measures performed in practice by birth professionals according to the perineal risk subjectively estimated for each obstetric situation. METHODS: This is a practice survey conducted through an anonymous questionnaire distributed to birth professionals (gynecologists, interns, midwife and midwife student) in October 2016. Topics covered concerned maternal, obstetric and fetal risk factors associated with perineal (1st to 4th degrees) lesions and the associated protective measures. A descriptive analysis of the data collected was conducted. RESULTS: One hundred and five professionals answered the questionnaire. The identified risk factors were consistent with those highlighted in the literature. Other factors, not known as associated with perineal risk, were cited by professionals (smoking, phototype). If the professional perceived a significant perineal risk, they more frequently practiced an episiotomy (15% vs. 0%, P<0.001) or considered that the delivery should be performed by an obstetrician (34% vs 8%, P<0.001). CONCLUSION: This evaluation shows that birth professionals know the main risk factors for perineal injury. On the other hand, they easily use perineal protection maneuvers (episiotomy for example) without real demonstrated effectiveness.