Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS® ) Society abdominal and thoracic surgery recommendations: A systematic review and comparison of guidelines for perioperative and pharmacotherapy core items.

INTRODUCTION: Worldwide, ERAS® Society guidelines have ushered in a new era of perioperative care. The purpose of this systematic review is to compare published core elements and pharmacotherapy recommendations embedded within ERAS® Society abdominal and thoracic surgery (ATS) guidelines. Determining whether a consensus exists for pharmacological core items would make future guideline preparation for similar surgeries more standardized and could improve patient care by reducing unnecessary protocol variations. METHODS: From the ERAS® Society website as of May 2023, 16 current ERAS® published ATS guidelines were included in the analysis to determine consensus and differing statements regarding each ERAS® perioperative and pharmacotherapy-related item. The aims were to (a) determine whether a consensus for each item could be derived, (b) identify gaps in ERAS® protocol development, and (c) propose potential research directions for addressing the identified gaps in the literature. RESULTS: Core items with consensus included: preoperative smoking and alcohol cessation; avoiding bowel reparation and fasting; multimodal preanesthetic, perioperative analgesia, and postoperative nausea and vomiting regimens; low molecular weight heparins for in-hospital and at-home venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; antibiotic prophylaxis; skin preparation; goal-directed perioperative fluid management with balanced crystalloids; perioperative nutrition care; ileus prevention with peripherally-acting mu receptor antagonists; and glucose control. CONCLUSION: While consensus was found for aspects of 21 current ERAS® guideline core items related to pharmacotherapy choice, details related to doses, regimen, timing of administration as well as unique aspects pertaining to specific surgeries remain to be researched and harmonized to promote guideline consistency and further optimize patient outcomes.

Does Human Amnion Membrane Prevent Postoperative Abdominal Adhesions?

BACKGROUND: Adhesions are bands of tissue that form postoperatively after intra-abdominal surgery. Adhesions cause significant morbidity and despite ongoing research no agent or method has been shown to completely prevent adhesions. Human amnion-derived matrix is a complex tissue matrix derived from human placenta and has been used in other areas of surgery to promote healing and decrease scar tissue formation. Our hypothesis was that aerosolized human amnion-derived matrix particulate solution (HAMPS) applied during abdominal surgery would decrease adhesion formation in rats. METHODS: Twenty-four Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into 4 different groups. Group 1 was the control group (CG) which had cecal abrasion 20× with a surgical rasp to generate the adhesion model. Groups 2-4 were the treatment groups (TGs) and had cecal abrasion plus application of the HAMPS at concentrations of 6.25, 12.5, and 25 mg/cc, respectively. After 30 days, rats were euthanized and adhesion assessment performed. RESULTS: In all groups there were minimal adhesions noted at necropsy. Moderate inflammation was 33% in CG versus 11% in combined TGs. Average adhesion was 1.00 in CG versus 0.44 in combined TGs. This indicated an observational improvement in adhesions/inflammation in the TGs, although this did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend toward significance in the 12.5 mg/cc group alone (P = .054). CONCLUSION: Overall, HAMPS showed an observational decrease in adhesions in TGs although not statistically significant. There was a trend toward significance in the 12.5 mg group. Additional studies will have to be performed to further evaluate this subgroup.