Low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis syndrome (LPAC), a not uncommon cause of biliary problems and hospital admissions.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Biliary diseases are a major source of morbidity and mortality for patients and a burden for the healthcare system. The genetic syndrome LPAC (low phospholipid-associated cholelithiasis) is a little known and rare entity whose treatment with bile salts avoids symptoms, admissions and the need for surgery. Our aim is to determine its incidence and characteristics in our center. METHODS: Prospective study between February 2021 and September 2022. LPAC was diagnosed if (at least two): onset of biliary problems <40 years of age, recurrence of symptoms after cholecystectomy, ultrasound image of hepatolithiasis (multiple echoic foci, comet-tail images, hepatolithiasis with acoustic shadow). Demographic, clinical, genetic (analysis of MDR3 gene mutations) and ultrasound characteristics were analyzed, as well as their incidence in hospital admissions for biliary causes. RESULTS: 36 patients with LPAC were identified. Of these, 6 were among 237 admissions for biliary causes in the previous 9 months, with an incidence of 2.5% (95%CI 1.17-5.41). By age subgroup, the incidence was 16.7% in those admitted <40 years and 9.1% in those <50 years. Considering women only, the incidence was 21% in those admitted <40 years and 15.8% in those <50 years. All patients remained asymptomatic after treatment with ursodeoxycholic acid and there were no new admissions. CONCLUSIONS: LPAC syndrome is not as uncommon as it may appear, especially in women <50 years of age admitted with biliary problems. Its correct diagnosis based on simple criteria would avoid a significant number of hospital admissions and unnecessary cholecystectomies.

Evaluation of the transition from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. / Valoración de la transición de vedolizumab intravenoso a subcutáneo en pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

AIMS: The aim of the study is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical response of inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab, 16 weeks after transitioning from intravenous (iv) to subcutaneous (sc). METHODS: An observational, prospective, single-center cohort study was performed. Patients with inflammatory bowel disease and maintenance treatment with vedolizumab, stable for at least 4 months, were offered to switch to sc formulation. At the same time of treatment administration a blood test was performed, with vedolizumab levels and fecal calprotectin. RESULTS: Forty-three patients were included, 12 of them (27.9%) chose to transition to sc formulation. All included patients remained in remission during follow-up. At week 16 no significant differences were found in terms of calprotectin levels in patients on iv treatment (mean 146.6±SD 45.9) vs. sc (159.26±53.9) (p=0.9). Vedolizumab serum levels at week 16 were higher in the sc group (22,364.3±5141.6) vs. iv (11,425.9±1514.2) (p=0.009). At week 16, 9 (75%) of the patients in the sc group were highly satisfied with the medication and 11 (91.7%) considered it easy to administer. Four patients (12.9%) in the iv group and 2 (16.6%) in the sc group presented mild adverse effects. The 2 cases (100%) of the sc group the adverse event was local inflammation at the injection site. CONCLUSION: In our experience, vedolizumab sc is a convenient alternative to iv administration. Vedolizumab serum levels in patients who transitioned to sc were higher than iv formulation.

Intensification with Intravenous Ustekinumab in Refractory Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: The rates of clinical and biochemical responses in Crohn's disease (CD) patients treated with intravenous (IV) ustekinumab (UST) intensification are scarcely described. METHODS: Patients with diagnosis of CD who were under intensified IV ustekinumab treatment (130 mg every 4 weeks) were retrospectively included, evaluating the clinical and biochemical response 12 weeks after the change in treatment regimen (switch from SC to IV), as well as the serum levels of the drug. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients, all of whom had transitioned to intensified intravenous ustekinumab treatment due to a secondary loss of response to the drug, were included in the retrospective analysis. At the baseline visit, prior to changing IV UST, differences in levels were observed between intensified and non-intensified patients (7216 vs. 2842 ng/mL, p = 0.00005). However, no significant differences were found between these two groups 12 weeks after IV intensification (7949 vs. 7937 ng/mL; p = 0.99). In patients with previous intensified UST SC, a decrease in fecal calprotectin was observed 12 weeks after starting IV intensification, going from a mean of 1463 ug/g to 751 ug/g, although the differences were not significant (p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: In our experience, intensifying treatment with IV UST leads to clinical and biochemical improvements in CD patients with a secondary loss of response to SC maintenance with this drug, and an increase in drug levels was observed 12 weeks after IV UST intensification.

Endoscopia urgente frente a endoscopia precoz: ¿tiene algún papel la endoscopia urgente en la hemorragia digestiva alta aguda no varicosa? / Urgent endoscopy versus early endoscopy: Does urgent endoscopy play a role in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding?

Introducción: Las principales guías de práctica clínica recomiendan la realización de endoscopia dentro de las 24horas posteriores a la admisión en urgencias en pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta no variceal. Sin embargo, es un margen de tiempo muy amplio y el papel de la endoscopia urgente (<6horas) es controvertido. Material y métodos: Estudio prospectivo observacional realizado en Hospital Universitario La Paz, donde son seleccionados todos los pacientes, desde el 1 de enero de 2015 hasta el 30 de abril de 2020, que acudieron a urgencias y fueron sometidos a endoscopia por sospecha de hemorragia digestiva alta. Se establecieron dos grupos de pacientes: endoscopia urgente (<6horas) y precoz (6-24horas). El objetivo primario del estudio fue la mortalidad a los 30días. Resultados: Un total de 1.096 pacientes fueron incluidos, de los cuales 682 fueron sometidos a endoscopia urgente. La mortalidad a los 30 días fue del 6% (5% vs 7,7%, p=0,064) y del resangrado fue del 9,6%. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas en la mortalidad, resangrado, necesidad de tratamiento endoscópico, cirugía y/o embolización, pero sí en la necesidad de transfusión (57,5% vs 68,4%, p<0,001) y el número de concentrados de hematíes transfundidos (2,85±4,01 vs 3,51±4,09, p=0,008). Conclusión: La endoscopia urgente, en pacientes con hemorragia digestiva alta aguda, también el subgrupo de alto riesgo (GBS ≥ 12), no se asoció con una mortalidad menor a los 30 días que la endoscopia precoz. Sin embargo, en los pacientes con lesiones endoscópicas de alto riesgo (Forrest I-IIB), fue un predictor significativo de menor mortalidad. Por lo tanto, se requieren más estudios para la identificación correcta de pacientes, que se beneficien de esta actitud médica (endoscopia urgente). (AU)

Introduction: The main clinical practice guidelines recommend endoscopy within 24hours after admission to the Emergency Department in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it is a wide time frame and the role of urgent endoscopy (<6hours) is controversial. Material and methods: Prospective observational study carried out at La Paz University Hospital, where all patients were selected, from January 1, 2015 to April 30, 2020, who attended the Emergency Room and underwent endoscopy for suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Two groups of patients were established: urgent endoscopy (<6hours) and early endoscopy (6-24hours). The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. Results: A total of 1096 were included, of whom 682 underwent urgent endoscopy. Mortality at 30days was 6% (5% vs 7.7%, P=.064) and rebleeding was 9.6%. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, rebleeding, need for endoscopic treatment, surgery and/or embolization, but there were differences in the necessity for transfusion(57.5% vs 68.4%, P<.001) and the number of concentrates of transfused red blood cells (2.85±4.01 vs 3.51±4.09, P=.008). Conclusion: Urgent endoscopy, in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as the high-risk subgroup (GBS ≥12), was not associated with lower 30-day mortality than early endoscopy. However, urgent endoscopy in patients with high-risk endoscopic lesions (ForrestI-IIB), was a significant predictor of lower mortality. Therefore, more studies are required for the correct identification of patients who benefit from this medical approach (urgent endoscopy). (AU)

Urgent endoscopy versus early endoscopy: Does urgent endoscopy play a role in acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding? / Endoscopia urgente frente a endoscopia precoz: ¿tiene algún papel la endoscopia urgente en la hemorragia digestiva alta aguda no varicosa?

INTRODUCTION: The main clinical practice guidelines recommend endoscopy within 24hours after admission to the Emergency Department in patients with non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. However, it is a wide time frame and the role of urgent endoscopy (<6hours) is controversial. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Prospective observational study carried out at La Paz University Hospital, where all patients were selected, from January 1, 2015 to April 30, 2020, who attended the Emergency Room and underwent endoscopy for suspected upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Two groups of patients were established: urgent endoscopy (<6hours) and early endoscopy (6-24hours). The primary endpoint of the study was 30-day mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1096 were included, of whom 682 underwent urgent endoscopy. Mortality at 30days was 6% (5% vs 7.7%, P=.064) and rebleeding was 9.6%. There were no statistically significant differences in mortality, rebleeding, need for endoscopic treatment, surgery and/or embolization, but there were differences in the necessity for transfusion(57.5% vs 68.4%, P<.001) and the number of concentrates of transfused red blood cells (2.85±4.01 vs 3.51±4.09, P=.008). CONCLUSION: Urgent endoscopy, in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, as well as the high-risk subgroup (GBS ≥12), was not associated with lower 30-day mortality than early endoscopy. However, urgent endoscopy in patients with high-risk endoscopic lesions (ForrestI-IIB), was a significant predictor of lower mortality. Therefore, more studies are required for the correct identification of patients who benefit from this medical approach (urgent endoscopy).

Serologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine can be altered in patients with immune-mediated diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, and in patients under immunosuppressive treatment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the serologic response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, to analyze the influence of immunosuppressive drugs on response, and to describe any adverse events in this population. METHODS: this was a prospective study that included adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Baseline characteristics, concomitant treatments and previous COVID-19 symptoms were collected. Patients underwent serological testing before the first and after the second vaccine dose. RESULTS: a total of 265 patients were consecutively included. Patients received one of the following vaccines: messenger RNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna; and adenovirus vaccines from AstraZeneca and Janssen. All adverse events were mild, and the most frequent was injection site pain in 141 (86 %) patients. The seroconversion rate according to the treatment that patients were receiving was: 100 % for those without treatment, 92.5 % for patients treated with mesalazine, 90.3 % for those receiving immunomodulators, 88.9 % for patients with biological monotherapy and 92.5 % for patients on combined treatment. The generation of antibodies according to the vaccine administered was: Pfizer 92.9 %, Moderna 93.3 %, AstraZeneca 98.4 %, and Janssen 12.5 %. CONCLUSION: the antibody response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is high in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, patients treated with immunosuppressive or biologic drugs had a lower response. Adverse events were frequent, but not serious.

Effectiveness of ultrasound in the differential diagnosis of ileitis detected by computed tomography.

CASE REPORT A 86-year-old man with a recent history of stent placement for infrarenal aortic aneurysm arrives to the emergency department with abdominal pain. Computed tomography (CT) is performed to rule out complications of the endovascular procedure. The CT showed a loop of ileum with decreased caliber, fat trabeculation and hypervascularity causing proximal dilatation. No signs of ischemia or complications related to the prosthesis were observed. He was admitted to our service due to findings of non-specific ileitis. An intestinal ultrasound was performed and revealed a short segment of proximal ileum with pathological wall thickening with an intraluminal birefringent filamentary hyperechoic material (foreign body), which crossed all the layers of the wall. In the following days serial ultrasounds were performed showing that the foreign body remained in the same location and it was decided to perform surgery. During surgery the foreign body turned out to be a blister which conditioned an ileitis. Finally, intestinal resection was performed and the patient presented good clinical evolution. DISCUSSION The most validated technique for the diagnosis of foreign bodies is CT (1). However, intestinal ultrasound could help in its identification, especially for the non-radiopaque ingested material. On the other hand, it is especially useful in the pediatric age, where exposure to ionizing radiation should be avoided (2,3). In our case, it allowed not only to establish the diagnosis immediately but also to evaluate the evolutionary behavior of the same in terms of its mobilization or detection of local complications.

Influence of biologic therapy on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. / Influencia del tratamiento biológico en los factores de riesgo cardiovascular de los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

INTRODUCTION: Chronic immune-mediated diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), present an increased risk of developing early atherosclerosis and cardiovascular events (CVE) at early age. OBJECTIVE: To describe the baseline and 1-year cardiovascular profile of patients with IBD according to the biologic treatment received, taking into account the inflammatory activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: It is a retrospective, observational study that included 374 patients. Cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and CVE were collected at the baseline visit and at one-year follow-up to describe the cardiovascular risk according to the biological treatment received, also assessing clinical and biological remission. RESULTS: A total of 374 patients were included: 146 (38.73%) were treated with Infliximab, 128 (33.95%) with adalimumab, 61 (16.18%) with ustekinumab and 42 (11.14%) with vedolizumab. The changes in blood glucose levels are [86.31mg/dL (84.57-88.06) vs. 89.25mg/dL (87.54-90.96), P=.001] for those treated with antiTNFα and [86.52mg/dL (83.48-89.55) vs. 89.44mg/dL (85.77-93.11), P=.11] in the other group. In the group treated with antiTNFα total cholesterol values at baseline visit are [169.40mg/dL (164.97-173.83) vs. 177.40mg/dL (172.75-182.05) at one year of treatment, P=<.001], those of HDL [50.22mg/dL (48.39-52.04) vs. 54.26mg/dL (52.46-56.07), P=<.001] and those of triglycerides [114.77mg/dL (106.36-123.18) vs. 121.83mg/dL (112.11-131.54), P=.054]. Regarding weight, an increase was observed, both in those patients treated with antiTNFα [71.39kg (69.53-73.25) vs. 72.87kg (71.05-74.70), P<.001], and in the group treated with ustekinumab and vedolizumab [67.59kg (64.10-71.08) vs. 69.43kg (65.65-73.04), P=.003]. Concerning CVE, no significant differences were observed neither according to the drug used (p=0.36), nor according to personal history of CVE (P=.23) nor according to inflammatory activity (P=.46). CONCLUSIONS: Our results on a real cohort of patients with IBD treated with biologic drugs show a better control of certain cardiovascular parameters such as CRP or HDL, but a worsening of others such as total cholesterol or triglycerides, regardless of the treatment. Therefore, it is possibly the disease control and not the therapeutic target used, the one that affect the cardiovascular risk of these patients.

Randomized clinical trial evaluating three low-volume preparations for colonoscopy in outpatients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: the EII-PREP trial.

BACKGROUND: Data regarding bowel preparation in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) are scarce. AIM: To compare efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-volume preparations in patients with IBD. METHODS: Single-center, randomized, prescriber, and colonoscopist-blinded clinical trial. IBD outpatients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 1 Liter-polyethylene glycol-ascorbate (1L-PEG), 2 Liters-PEG, or sodium picosulfate (SP). The primary endpoint was percentage of quality cleansing assessed via the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS ≥6, segments ≥2). Secondary endpoints were total high quality cleansing (BBPS 8 or 9), high-quality segmental BBPS (≥2), and patients' tolerability, symptoms, and satisfaction, assessed by questionnaires. Safety was monitored by adverse event reporting, laboratory evaluation at colonoscopy, and telephonic follow-up. RESULTS: Ninety-two patients were included (33 1L-PEG, 28 2L-PEG, and 31 SP). No significant differences between preparations were observed in quality or high-quality total BBPS or high-quality segmental BBPS. Complete intake of the solution was higher for SP (p = 0.006) and lower for 1L-PEG (p = 0.02) compared to 2L-PEG intake (p = 0.55). Clinically irrelevant hyponatremia was higher in the SP group (p < 0.0001). SP instructions were easier to understand from patient's point of view (p = 0.01). Willingness to retake was higher with SP (p < 0.0001) and less for 1L-PEG (p < 0.0001). No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: We observed no differences in efficacy between low-volume preparations in patients with IBD. Complete intake was higher for SP and lower for 1L-PEG. SP and 2L-PEG instructions were better understood and graded, and SP was more likely to be retaken. Willingness to retake was lower for 1L-PEG. No serious adverse events were reported. SUMMARY: No differences in terms of efficacy were regarded in this clinical trial comparing low-volume preparations for colonoscopy in patients with IBD: however, Sodium Pisoculfate is better tolerated and accepted from patient's point of view. No serious adverse events were reported.

Serologic response to COVID-19 vaccines in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a prospective study

Background and aims: response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine can be altered in patients with immune-mediated diseases, such as inflammatory bowel disease, and in patients under immunosuppressive treatment. The aims of this study were to evaluate the serologic response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in patients with inflammatory bowel disease, to analyze the influence of immunosuppressive drugs on response, and to describe any adverse events in this population. Methods: this was a prospective study that included adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Baseline characteristics, concomitant treatments and previous COVID-19 symptoms were collected. Patients underwent serological testing before the first and after the second vaccine dose. Results: a total of 265 patients were consecutively included. Patients received one of the following vaccines: messenger RNA vaccines from Pfizer/BioNTech and Moderna; and adenovirus vaccines from AstraZeneca and Janssen. All adverse events were mild, and the most frequent was injection site pain in 141 (86 %) patients. The seroconversion rate according to the treatment that patients were receiving was: 100 % for those without treatment, 92.5 % for patients treated with mesalazine, 90.3 % for those receiving immunomodulators, 88.9 % for patients with biological monotherapy and 92.5 % for patients on combined treatment. The generation of antibodies according to the vaccine administered was: Pfizer 92.9 %, Moderna 93.3 %, AstraZeneca 98.4 %, and Janssen 12.5 %. Conclusion: the antibody response after vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is high in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. However, patients treated with immunosuppressive or biologic drugs had a lower response. Adverse events were frequent, but not serious (AU)

Correlación entre la endoscopia y la ecografía intestinal para la evaluación de la recurrencia posquirúrgica de la enfermedad de Crohn / Correlation between endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound for the evaluation of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease

Objetivo: La ecografía intestinal se considera una alternativa para la evaluación de la recurrencia posquirúrgica (RPQ) de la enfermedad de Crohn. El objetivo de este estudio es evaluar la correlación entre los hallazgos ecográficos y endoscópicos.Métodos: Se recogieron de forma retrospectiva los datos de pacientes con enfermedad de Crohn y resección ileocecal en los que se había realizado una colonoscopia y una ecografía intestinal para la detección de RPQ. La RPQ se evaluó empleando el índice de Rutgeerts (IR). Los hallazgos ecográficos analizados fueron el grosor de la pared intestinal, la hiperemia parietal por Doppler, la desestructuración del patrón de capas y la proliferación fibrograsa.Resultados: Se incluyó a un total de 31 pacientes, 15 (48,4%) sin recurrencia (IR? mm vs. 5,68mm; p?<0,001). La hiperemia también se asoció de forma significativa con la recurrencia endoscópica (p?=?0,03). Para el grosor parietal se obtuvo un área bajo la curva ROC (AUC) del 92,9% y, con punto de corte en 3,4mm, la sensibilidad fue del 100% y la especificidad del 86,6%. Al comparar con los biomarcadores principales (calprotectina fecal y PCR sérica) se obtuvo un AUC superior para el grosor (72,3% y 72,3% vs. 92,9%).Conclusiones: En nuestra experiencia, la ecografía tiene una alta rentabilidad diagnóstica para la detección de RPQ y puede considerarse en muchas ocasiones como una alternativa válida y no invasiva a la ileocolonoscopia.

Objective: Intestinal ultrasound is considered to be a valid alternative for the evaluation of post-operative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between ultrasound and endoscopic findings.Methods: Patients with Crohn's disease were retrospectively recruited who had undergone ileocecal resection, and for whom a colonoscopy and intestinal ultrasound had been performed for the detection of POR. Recurrence was assessed using the Rutgeerts score (RS). The ultrasound findings analysed were bowel wall thickness (BWT), parietal hyperaemia using power Doppler, loss of layer pattern and mesenteric fat hypertrophy.Results: A total of 31 patients were included, of which 15 (48.4%) had no POR (RS<2b) and 16 (51.6%) had POR (RS≥2b). A statistically significant association was identified between BWT and the presence of endoscopic recurrence (a mean of 2.75mm vs. 5.68mm, P>0.001). There was also a statistically significant difference in hyperaemia between the 2groups (P=0.03). For wall thickness, an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 92.9% was obtained, and with a cut-off point of 3.4mm, a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86.6%. When comparing with the most frequent biomarkers (fecal calprotectin and serum CRP), a higher AUC was obtained for wall thickness (72.3% and 72.3% vs. 92.9%).Conclusions: In our experience, ultrasound has high diagnostic efficacy in the detection of POR and can be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to endoscopy.

Correlation between endoscopy and intestinal ultrasound for the evaluation of postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease. / Correlación entre la endoscopia y la ecografía intestinal para la evaluación de la recurrencia posquirúrgica de la enfermedad de Crohn.

OBJECTIVE: Intestinal ultrasound is considered to be a valid alternative for the evaluation of post-operative recurrence (POR) of Crohn's disease. The aim of this study is to assess the correlation between ultrasound and endoscopic findings. METHODS: Patients with Crohn's disease were retrospectively recruited who had undergone ileocecal resection, and for whom a colonoscopy and intestinal ultrasound had been performed for the detection of POR. Recurrence was assessed using the Rutgeerts score (RS). The ultrasound findings analysed were bowel wall thickness (BWT), parietal hyperaemia using power Doppler, loss of layer pattern and mesenteric fat hypertrophy. RESULTS: A total of 31 patients were included, of which 15 (48.4%) had no POR (RS<2b) and 16 (51.6%) had POR (RS≥2b). A statistically significant association was identified between BWT and the presence of endoscopic recurrence (a mean of 2.75mm vs. 5.68mm, P>0.001). There was also a statistically significant difference in hyperaemia between the 2groups (P=0.03). For wall thickness, an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 92.9% was obtained, and with a cut-off point of 3.4mm, a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 86.6%. When comparing with the most frequent biomarkers (fecal calprotectin and serum CRP), a higher AUC was obtained for wall thickness (72.3% and 72.3% vs. 92.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In our experience, ultrasound has high diagnostic efficacy in the detection of POR and can be considered a valid non-invasive alternative to endoscopy.

Ileal endometriosis in a patient with Crohn's disease: a diagnostic challenge.

A 34-year-old female with stricturing ileal Crohn´s disease (CD) treated with adalimumab presented with recurrent subocclusive episodes and clinical worsening. First, she received corticosteroids without any clinical improvement.

Optimization of azathioprine dose in combined treatment with anti-TNF-alpha in inflammatory bowel disease / Optimización de la dosis de azatioprina en tratamiento combinado con fármacos anti-TNF en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal

Introduction: The dose of thiopurine drugs in combined treatments with anti-TNF in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the dose of azathioprine influences clinical and biochemical response/remission rates, and anti-TNF drug levels/antibody formation. Material and methods: Patients with IBD on combined maintenance treatment with azathioprine and infliximab or adalimumab were selected. Based on the dose of azathioprine, two groups were defined (standard: 2–2.5mg/kg/day; and decreased: less than 2mg/kg/day). Results: In the IFX group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.204) in the rates of remission (39% vs 41.3%), response (10% vs 21.7%) or failure (51.5% vs 37%) depending on the dose of thiopurine drugs. No differences were found between AZA-dose dependent IFX levels (2.46 vs 3.21μg/mL; p=0.211). In the adalimumab group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.83) in the rates of remission (66% vs 56%), response without remission (15.38% vs 25%) or failure (18% vs 18%) depending on the dose of thiopurines. With respect to ADA-levels, no differences were found in both groups (7.69 vs 8.23μg/mL; p=0.37). Conclusion: In our experience, no statistically significant differences were found in either anti-TNF levels or clinical-biological response/remission rates based on doses of azathioprine.(AU)

Introducción: La dosis adecuada de los fármacos tiopurínicos en tratamientos combinados con anti-TNF en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal (EII) no ha sido establecida con claridad. El propósito de este estudio es evaluar si la dosis de azatioprina influye en las tasas de respuesta/remisión clínica y bioquímica y en los niveles de fármaco anti-TNF/formación de anticuerpos. Material y métodos: Se seleccionaron pacientes con EII en tratamiento combinado de mantenimiento con azatioprina (AZA) e infliximab (IFX) o adalimumab (ADA). En función de la dosis de AZA, se definieron dos grupos (estándar: 2-2,5 mg/kg/día o disminuida: menos de 2 mg/kg/día). Resultados: En el grupo IFX no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,204) en las tasas de remisión (39 vs. 41,3%), respuesta (10 vs. 21,7%) o fracaso (51,5 vs. 37%), dependiendo de la dosis de fármacos tiopurínicos. No se encontraron diferencias entre los niveles de IFX dependientes de la dosis de AZA (2,46 vs. 3,21 μg/mL; p = 0,211). En el grupo de ADA no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas (p = 0,83) en las tasas de remisión (66 vs. 56%), respuesta sin remisión (15,38 vs. 25%) o fallo (18 vs. 18%), dependiendo de la dosis de tiopurinas. Con respecto a los niveles de ADA, no se encontraron diferencias en ambos grupos (7,69 vs. 8,23 μg/mL; p = 0,37). Conclusión: En nuestra experiencia, no se encontraron diferencias estadísticamente significativas ni en los niveles de anti-TNF ni en las tasas de respuesta/remisión clínico-biológica basadas en las dosis de azatioprina.(AU)

Recommendations of the Spanish Working Group on Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis (GETECCU) on the use of abdominal ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease. / Recomendaciones del Grupo Español de Trabajo en Enfermedad de Crohn y Colitis Ulcerosa (GETECCU) sobre el empleo de la ecografía abdominal en la enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.

Ultrasound has an excellent diagnostic performance when Crohn's disease is suspected, when performing an activity assessment, or determining the extension and location of Crohn's disease, very similar to other examinations such as MRI or CT. It has a good correlation with endoscopic lesions and allows the detection of complications such as strictures, fistulas or abscesses. It complements colonoscopy in the diagnosis and, given its tolerance, cost and immediacy, it can be considered as a good tool for disease monitoring. In ulcerative colitis, its role is less relevant, being limited to assessing the extent and activity when it is not possible with other diagnostic techniques or if there are doubts with these. Despite its advantages, its use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is not widespread in Spain. For this reason, this document reviews the advantages and disadvantages of the technique to promote knowledge about it and implementation of it in IBD Units.

Doppler Activity and Ultrasonographic Detection of Intra-Abdominal Fistulas Are Predictors of Surgery in Crohn's Disease.

Bakground and Aim: Predictors of the need for surgery in sticturing Crohn's disease (SCD) are lacking. Bowel ultrasound (US) is a harmless, noninvasive, and inexpensive diagnostic procedure that has proven to be a valuable tool in the management of Crohn's disease (CD). Our aim was to identify ultrasonographic findings in SCD that may associate with a higher risk of surgery, allowing us to make early choices regarding treatment election in this specific group of patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective, case-control study. Twenty-four patients diagnosed with SCD between 2013 and 2017 with a past history of stricture-related surgery were included and then matched with 46 non-operated controls. Prior US from patients in both groups were analyzed. US features considered for analysis were as follows: bowel wall thickness, degree of parietal vascularization (measured by Doppler activity), prestenotic dilation, involvement of mesenteric fat, and newly detected concomitant fistulas or abscess. RESULTS: Doppler activity (p < 0.001), enteroenteric fistulas (p = 0.04), enteromesenteric fistulas (p = 0.003), and associated abscess (p = 0.004) were significantly associated with the need for surgery in the short-term period. Multivariate analysis showed strong association of these features with the risk of surgery but failed to reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: US features may potentially be used as point-of-care tools to aid clinicians in the assessment of the surgical risk in patients with SCD.

Prognostic value of ultrasound activity and parietal healing in patients with Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: the "treat to target" strategy for the management of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) requires simple, reliable and non-invasive tools for continuous monitoring of the disease. Intestinal ultrasound has been proposed as an emerging technique that could be very useful in this field. MATERIAL AND METHODS: patients who had undergone an intestinal ultrasound in the clinical practice between February 2013 and October 2018 at our hospital were retrospectively included. The evolution of the patients during follow-up was assessed based on the presence of ultrasound activity and the therapeutic changes based on the results. RESULTS: two hundred and seventy-seven CD patients were included and the median follow-up time was 24 months (range 5-73 months). Signs of ultrasound inflammatory activity were identified in 166 patients (60 %), and of them, treatment was escalated in 116 patients (70 %) based on the results of the ultrasound. Among patients with identified ultrasound activity, in 166 patients (60 %) the evolution was less favorable than in those without activity, with a shorter time until the next outbreak. Thus, the median disease-free survival (without outbreaks) after performing the ultrasound was 18 months when ultrasound activity was identified (although in most of the patients [70 %] the treatment had been escalated) vs 47 months in patients without ultrasound activity. However, these differences were not statistically significant (p < 0.0001). Among the 111 patients without ultrasound activity, those who achieved "parietal healing" (74 patients) had a better evolution with a 12 % subsequent outbreak vs 27 % during follow-up (p = 0.05). Thus, 15 % of patients with parietal healing had an outbreak vs 34 % of those who had not normalized the ultrasound findings after three years of follow-up. CONCLUSION: intestinal ultrasound is a technique capable of detecting inflammatory activity in patients with Crohn's disease and the presence of ultrasound activity is a risk factor for a new outbreak of activity and/or clinical relapse. Likewise, the presence of "parietal or transmural healing" (PH) is associated with a better evolution of patients during follow-up. Thus, it could be a more precise objective to consider deep remission in CD, with intestinal ultrasound being a useful technique for this purpose.

Optimization of azathioprine dose in combined treatment with anti-TNF-alpha in inflammatory bowel disease.

INTRODUCTION: The dose of thiopurine drugs in combined treatments with anti-TNF in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has not been clearly established. The purpose of this study is to assess whether the dose of azathioprine influences clinical and biochemical response/remission rates, and anti-TNF drug levels/antibody formation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with IBD on combined maintenance treatment with azathioprine and infliximab or adalimumab were selected. Based on the dose of azathioprine, two groups were defined (standard: 2-2.5mg/kg/day; and decreased: less than 2mg/kg/day). RESULTS: In the IFX group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.204) in the rates of remission (39% vs 41.3%), response (10% vs 21.7%) or failure (51.5% vs 37%) depending on the dose of thiopurine drugs. No differences were found between AZA-dose dependent IFX levels (2.46 vs 3.21µg/mL; p=0.211). In the adalimumab group, there were no statistically significant differences (p=0.83) in the rates of remission (66% vs 56%), response without remission (15.38% vs 25%) or failure (18% vs 18%) depending on the dose of thiopurines. With respect to ADA-levels, no differences were found in both groups (7.69 vs 8.23µg/mL; p=0.37). CONCLUSION: In our experience, no statistically significant differences were found in either anti-TNF levels or clinical-biological response/remission rates based on doses of azathioprine.