How Do Cancer-Specific Computed Tomography Protocols Compare With the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry? An Analysis of Computed Tomography Dose at 2 Cancer Centers.

BACKGROUND: Little guidance exists on how to stratify radiation dose according to diagnostic task. Changing dose for different cancer types is currently not informed by the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey. METHODS: A total of 9602 patient examinations were pulled from 2 National Cancer Institute designated cancer centers. Computed tomography dose (CTDI vol ) was extracted, and patient water equivalent diameter was calculated. N-way analysis of variance was used to compare the dose levels between 2 protocols used at site 1, and three protocols used at site 2. RESULTS: Sites 1 and 2 both independently stratified their doses according to cancer indications in similar ways. For example, both sites used lower doses ( P < 0.001) for follow-up of testicular cancer, leukemia, and lymphoma. Median dose at median patient size from lowest to highest dose level for site 1 were 17.9 (17.7-18.0) mGy (mean [95% confidence interval]) and 26.8 (26.2-27.4) mGy. For site 2, they were 12.1 (10.6-13.7) mGy, 25.5 (25.2-25.7) mGy, and 34.2 (33.8-34.5) mGy. Both sites had higher doses ( P < 0.001) between their routine and high-image-quality protocols, with an increase of 48% between these doses for site 1 and 25% for site 2. High-image-quality protocols were largely applied for detection of low-contrast liver lesions or subtle pelvic pathology. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that 2 cancer centers independently choose to stratify their cancer doses in similar ways. Sites 1 and 2 dose data were higher than the American College of Radiology Dose Index Registry dose survey data. We thus propose including a cancer-specific subset for the dose registry.

Clinical implications of non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography for follow-up after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

BACKGROUND: There is growing concern over the long-term radiation exposure from serial computed tomographic (CT) scan follow-up after endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). Screening for endoleaks with non-contrast-enhanced volumetric CT has been shown to significantly reduce radiation doses. We evaluated the use of NCT as the primary method of follow-up after EVAR of AAAs. METHODS: Our institutional post-EVAR CT protocol consisted of contrast-enhanced CT angiography (CTA) 1 month after repair, followed by NCT at 3 or 6 and 12 months, and annually thereafter. At each follow-up scan, immediate 3-dimensional volume analysis was performed. If the volume change was <2%, NCT follow-up was continued. If the volume increased by ≥2% on nonenhanced images, contrast-enhanced CT was performed immediately to identify potential endoleaks. All images were reviewed by an experienced cardiovascular radiologist. End points included identification of endoleak, reintervention, and rupture. RESULTS: Over a 7-year period, 126 patients were followed. Serial CTA was performed in 59 patients, while 67 patients were followed with the NCT protocol. The mean follow-up was 2.07 years. There were no differences in age, sex, or initial aneurysm volume or size. There were 35 total endoleaks identified. Twenty of these were early endoleaks (<30 days post-EVAR). The remaining 15 leaks were late in nature (10 in the contrast group and 5 in the noncontrast group; P=0.17). NCT aneurysm sac volume changes prompted contrasted studies in all 5 late leaks. The mean volume change was 11.2 cm3, an average change of 5.88%. These findings were not significantly different than the late leaks found by routine contrast studies (8.9 cm3; 4.98% [P=0.58]). There were no delayed ruptures or emergent reinterventions in the NCT group. CONCLUSIONS: Serial NCT appears to be safe and effective as the sole means of follow-up after EVAR for AAAs. AAA volume increases of ≥2% should prompt further contrast-enhanced CT imaging. Changes of <2% can be safely followed with serial NCT. This protocol requires dedicated cardiovascular radiologist involvement, and patients should be retained in the radiology suite until real-time image evaluation can be completed.

Automated renal stone volume measurement by noncontrast computerized tomography is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement.

PURPOSE: We compared the reproducibility of automated volume and manual linear measurements using same study supine and prone, low dose, noncontrast computerized tomography series. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The patient cohort comprised 50 consecutive adults with a mean age of 56.4 years in whom renal calculi were identified during computerized tomography colonography screening. The largest stone per patient was assessed with the supine and prone computerized tomography series serving as mutual controls. Automated stone volume was derived using a commercially available coronary artery calcium scoring tool. Supine-prone reproducibility for automated volume was compared with intra-observer supine-prone manual linear measurement. Interobserver variability was also assessed for manual linear measurements of the same supine or prone series. RESULTS: Mean ± SD linear size and volume of the 50 index calculi was 4.5 ± 2.7 mm (range 1.8 to 16) and 141.7 ± 456.1 mm(3), respectively. The mean supine-prone error for automated stone volume was 16.3% compared with an average 11.7% 1-dimensional intra-observer error for manual axial measurement. Only 2 of 15 cases with a volume error of greater than 20% were 5 mm or greater in linear size. The average interobserver linear error for the same computerized tomography series was 26.3% but automated volume measurement of the same series did not vary. CONCLUSIONS: Automated noncontrast computerized tomography renal stone volume is more reproducible than manual linear size measurement and it avoids the often large interobserver variability seen with manual assessment. Since small linear differences correspond to much larger volume changes, greater absolute volume errors are acceptable. Automated volume measurement may be an improved clinical parameter to use for following the renal stone burden.

Background fluctuation of kidney function versus contrast-induced nephrotoxicity.

OBJECTIVE: The reported incidence of contrast-induced acute kidney injury varies widely. Almost no studies have been conducted to quantify the background fluctuation of kidney function of patients receiving iodinated contrast medium. The purpose of this study was a retrospective comparison of the incidence of acute kidney injury among patients undergoing CT with low-osmolar (iohexol) or isoosmolar (iodixanol) contrast medium with the incidence among patients undergoing CT without contrast administration. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Creatinine concentration and estimated glomerular filtration rate were evaluated for 11,588 patients. Rates of acute kidney injury (defined as a 0.5 mg/dL increase in serum creatinine concentration or a 25% or greater decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate within 3 days after CT) were compared among groups and stratified according to creatinine concentration and estimated glomerular filtration rate before the imaging examination. RESULTS: In all groups, the incidence of acute kidney injury increased with increasing baseline creatinine concentration. No significant difference in incidence of presumed contrast-induced kidney injury was identified between the isoosmolar contrast medium and the control groups. The incidence of acute kidney injury in the low-osmolar contrast medium cohort paralleled that of the control cohort up to a creatinine level of 1.8 mg/dL, but increases above this level were associated with a higher incidence of acute kidney injury. CONCLUSION: We identified a high incidence of acute kidney injury among control subjects undergoing unenhanced CT. The incidence of creatinine elevation in this group was statistically similar to that in the isoosmolar contrast medium group for all baseline creatinine values and all stages of chronic kidney disease. These findings suggest that the additional risk of acute kidney injury accompanying administration of contrast medium (contrast-induced nephrotoxicity) may be overstated and that much of the creatinine elevation in these patients is attributable to background fluctuation, underlying disease, or treatment.

Intraoperative sonography of intracranial arteriovenous malformations: how we do it.

OBJECTIVE: We have advanced the application of intraoperative neurosonography by combining gray scale sonographic imaging with pulsed wave Doppler and color flow Doppler imaging to guide and confirm resection of arteriovenous malformations of the brain. We want to share our technique with the imaging community. METHODS: We present a review of our scan technique as it has evolved over the 3 years during which we have been assisting our neurosurgical team. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Our experience has indicated that a combination of sonographic imaging and color and spectral Doppler imaging improves surgical resection of such lesions.

Using a saline chaser to decrease contrast media in abdominal CT.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare hepatic tumor conspicuity on CT after injection of either 150 mL of contrast material or 100 mL of contrast material plus a 50-mL saline chaser. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We evaluated 86 hypoattenuating liver metastases in 26 patients. Patients underwent CT in two sessions separated by a mean of 85 days: one time with 150 mL of contrast material and the other time with 100 mL of contrast material followed by a 50-mL saline chaser. The order of the sessions was randomized. Contrast material was administered via power injector and matched for injection rate and delay time. Attenuation values were obtained from normal liver tissue and metastases and from the spleen, kidney, aorta, and inferior vena cava. RESULTS: The 150 mL dose of contrast material caused slightly greater liver and tumor attenuation than 100 mL of contrast material with a chaser (mean hepatic attenuation, 95.6 vs 89.8 H, respectively; p < 0.03, paired t test; mean tumor attenuation, 53.2 vs 49.1 H, respectively; r = 0.71, p = 0.09). The difference in conspicuity of liver lesions was slightly greater with 150 mL than with 100 mL with a chaser (46.8 H vs 44.2 H; r = 0.46, p = 0.08, paired t test), but was of doubtful clinical significance (2.6 H). Kidney, spleen, and vascular structures enhanced more with 150 mL than with 100 mL and a chaser. CONCLUSION: Using 100 mL of contrast material and a saline chaser did not result in a meaningful difference in liver parenchyma attenuation or lesion conspicuity compared with using 150 mL of contrast medium alone. Routine use of a chaser for abdominal CT may yield cost savings and a decreased risk of contrast nephropathy.

Neuromuscular adaptations to concurrent strength and endurance training.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine muscle morphological and neural activation adaptations resulting from the interaction between concurrent strength and endurance training. METHODS: Thirty sedentary healthy male subjects were randomly assigned to one of three training groups that performed 10 wk of 3-d x wk(-1) high-intensity strength training (S), cycle endurance training (E), or concurrent strength and endurance training (CC). Strength, quadriceps-muscle biopsies, computed tomography scans at mid-thigh, and surface electromyogram (EMG) assessments were made before and after training. RESULTS: S and CC groups demonstrated similar increases (P < 0.0001) in both thigh extensor (12 and 14%) and flexor/adductor (7 and 6%) muscle areas. Type II myofiber areas similarly increased (P < 0.002) in both S (24%) and CC (28%) groups, whereas the increase (P < 0.004) in Type I area with S training (19%) was also similar to the nonsignificant (P = 0.041) increase with CC training (13%). Significant increases (P < 0.005) in maximal isometric knee-extension torque were accompanied by nonsignificant (P 0.38) in the EMG/torque relation across 20 to 100% maximal voluntary contractions occurred in any group. A small 3% increase (P < 0.01) in thigh extensor area was the only change in any of the above variables with E training. CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicate 3-d x wk(-1) concurrent performance of both strength and endurance training does not impair adaptations in strength, muscle hypertrophy, and neural activation induced by strength training alone. Results provide a physiological basis to support several performance studies that consistently indicate 3-d x wk(-1) concurrent training does not impair strength development over the short term.