Cyber pornography use and masturbation outburst. Considerations on 150 italian patients complaining erectile dysfunction and trying to solve it.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to verify the rate of masturbation (Mst) in a group of 150 Italian patients complaining Erectile Dysfunction (ED). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Our diagnostic protocol for penile and sexual problems included the collection of the patient's history, general and local clinical examination, and metabolic and hormonal analyses. Selected patients were also submitted to nocturnal penile tumescence test (Rigiscan), Duplex ultrasound of the penis, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, neurological tests and cardiological examination. A group of 150 Italian males (aged between 20 and 86 years) who complained ED and who presented to our Andrological Center to research the possibility of correcting their ED and being able to recover adequate sexual erectile activity were included in this study. In this group of patients suffering from ED we decided to evaluate the practice of Mst by asking specific questions: 1. Do you sometimes practice Mst? 2. How often in a week? 3. Is Mst hidden or known by the partner? 4. What do you use as a masturbatory sexual stimulus? The frequency of Mst was assessed according to a Likert scale as follow: a: No Mst; b:1-2/week; c: 2-3/week; d: > 3/week; e: daily or more. We also asked if it was possible to have penetrative marital intercourse on the same day as Mst (1-10 hours). We also asked what they used as a triggering sexual stimulus: press magazines, TV movies, the WEB. RESULTS: Only 5/150 patients did not report Mst while 27/145 pts (aged 20-30 years) reported it more than 3 times a week; 44/145 (aged 31-50 years) 1-3 times a week and 27/145 (51-86 years) 1-2 times a week. Almost all patients used WebPorn as a stimulus for Mst. A group of patients over the age of 50 said they were quite satisfied with the physical results of Mst even though they would prefer to have sex as part of a couple relationship. CONCLUSIONS: The outburst of Mst in this web-dominated era could affect the sexual activity of individual males and couples.

The woman and the penile prosthetic implant. Primary or secondary role? Personal experiences on 355 implanted patients.

In a group of 355 pts  submitted to Penile Prosthesis Implant (PPI) we recorded data on their relationships with the woman (wife, partner, girlfriend, lover); the aspects of their sexual life; if they were married, divorced or widowed; if they had a lover; if they frequented brothels; if they were satisfied of their actual couple's life; after operation we recorded data concerning if they had some difficulties utilizing the PPI and their level of satisfaction. After operation most pts (93%) confirmed their satisfaction. Relational aspects:  Unmarried pts: 6 pts (21-30 years old) who weren't able to penetrate their girlfriends managed to have regular sex with PPI and could marry. 42/46 unmarried pts after PPI decided to marry.  In the group of married pts 3 pts weren't able to penetrate  their wives; after PPI  they  managed to have regular intercourses and pregnancies. 15 widowers and 23 divorced  pts decided to have a PPI for possible sexual encounters or stable relationships. 96/271 (28,2%) married pts declared a stable extramarital relation that could represent the main reason for having a PPI.  The results of PPI are commonly accepted. Until now PPI may re-establish  penile rigidity and maintenance. In our opinion the simple act of penetrate and ejaculate in vagina, without considering the importance of personal, relational, emotional factors  often well linked to the specific woman, cannot be considered the ideal target of PPI.

Preputial circumcision performed with a new mechanical stapling tool. The "langhe disposable circumcision suture device". Preliminary experiences.

The Authors present their preliminary clinical experiences in performing preputial circumcision utilizing a new stapling tool.

500 penile prostheses implanted by a surgeon in Italy in the last 30 years.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to report our experience with patients affected by Erectile Dysfunction (ED) and undergoing penile prosthetic implantation (PPI) in a single center by a single surgeon. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcome of 500 patients (mean age: 51.5 years, range: 20-86 years) affected by ED and referred to our private andrological center from January 1984 to December 2013 who underwent penile prosthesis implantation, including the reported level of patient satisfaction. RESULTS: 182 silicone, 180 malleable, 18 monocomponent hydraulic and 120 multicomponents hydraulic prostheses were implanted by the same experienced surgeon. All patients were hospitalized for the procedure. All patients were evaluated immediately, 1 month (496 patients) and, for the great majority, every year after implantation. One hundred twenty five patients were lost to follow-up. Twenty two patients underwent revision surgery for complications in the postoperative period. The most serious postoperative complications were mechanical problems (45 patients, 9.0%) and infection (15 patients, 3%). Forty two (8.4%) prostheses were explanted. Overall, 80% (400/500) of patients were able to have sexual intercourse and were fully satisfied with the results. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience prosthetic surgery should be considered a good solution for men affected by ED and not responsive to other therapeutic solutions. Prosthetic surgery can be performed not only in large public hospitals but also in smaller private facilities.

Clinical understaging in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma submitted to radical prostatectomy: predictive value of serum chromogranin A.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether the pretreatment determination of serum chromogranin A (CgA) can provide information beyond that obtained with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) and Gleason score at biopsy as a predictive factor of clinical understaging (T2-pT3) of prostate adenocarcinoma. MATERIALS: In this prospective study, we analyzed 83 consecutive patients with clinical T2N0M0 prostate adenocarcinoma submitted to radical prostatectomy (RRP). On the same day of RRP, before surgery, a blood sample for the determination of serum total PSA and CgA levels (RIA) was obtained. RESULTS: After RRP, 27 of the 83 cases (32.5%) showed extracapsular disease extension (pT3) at the final pathological examination and were considered clinically understaged. A significant association between serum CgA and pathological stage (r = 0.3830; P = 0.0004) was found. At the multivariate analysis, serum CgA and PSA, but not biopsy Gleason score, were found to be significant pretreatment independent predictors of pT3 at RRP (P = 0.00004 and P = 0.0018, respectively). The relative risk of clinical understaging significantly varied according to serum CgA levels. Using a CgA cut-off value of 60 ng/ml, PPV and NPV for clinical understaging were 0.5161 and 0.7885, respectively (P = 0.0072). CONCLUSIONS: Serum CgA could be incorporated into risk assessment models of newly diagnosed prostate cancer.