RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: We sought to evaluate the contemporary role of a pathology review on management implications of patients with bladder cancer. METHODS: A total of 98 consecutive specimens from transurethral resections in patients with suspected bladder tumours were reviewed at our institution by genitourinary pathologist. Patients were classified into risk groups according to pathology reports obtained before and after review. A management course was proposed according to local institutional practice patterns and main urological guidelines. RESULTS: Overall, 34.7% of pathological reviews had significant changes associated with management implications, the majority of which were due to changes in risk category (and/or stage). On review pathology, 12 patients were recommended radical cystectomy instead of conservative management and two patients avoided radical cystectomy. Six patients initially staged as T1 and whose staging did not change after review had a proposed change in management in the form of early cystectomy as a treatment option, as they were deemed very high-risk secondary to high-risk features (such as carcinoma in situ or lymphovascular invasion found on review). Ten patients initially staged as T2 demonstrated high-risk features on review. CONCLUSIONS: Review by genitourinary pathologist remains important, as it defines more clearly the tumour risk category and influences the management of T1-T2 bladder cancer patients. A complete initial pathological report has the potential to further decrease the discrepancy between initial and review reports.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate was introduced in Quebec in 2012 for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients who had received chemotherapy with docetaxel. This study describes abiraterone use in the early postapproval period and its clinical effectiveness in Quebec, for both patients who had received docetaxel chemotherapy and those who could not receive docetaxel therapy owing to medical reasons. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using Quebec public health care administrative databases. Our cohort consisted of patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone between January 2012 and June 2013. Treatment groups were defined as patients who received abiraterone following docetaxel chemotherapy and those who received abiraterone without having had chemotherapy, under the "exception patient" measure. Study outcomes included overall survival, duration of abiraterone therapy and number of hospital days. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to estimate the effectiveness of abiraterone adjusted for several covariates. RESULTS: Our cohort consisted of 303 patients with mCRPC treated with abiraterone (99 after chemotherapy and 204 as exception patients). The median age at initiation of abiraterone therapy was 75.0 for the postchemotherapy group and 80.0 for the exception patient group. The corresponding median survival values were 12 and 14 months (log-rank test p = 0.8). Risk of death was similar in the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.89 [95% confidence interval 0.57-1.38]). INTERPRETATION: The effectiveness of abiraterone in older patients who were ineligible for chemotherapy was similar to that of patients with prior docetaxel exposure. Overall, the real-world survival benefits of abiraterone were similar to those in the COU-AA-301 trial.
