RESUMO
Introduction: Orthopaedic applicants have increased the average number of publications on their residency application to compete with the growing competitiveness of the field. The purpose of this study was to assess whether research productivity before orthopaedic residency and caliber of one's institution is correlated with academic productivity during residency. Methods: Scopus was used to extract publication metrics. Quantity and quality (how often the publications were cited) were analyzed at 2 different time periods: before and during residency. All subjects in the study had graduated an ACGME-accredited orthopaedic surgery residency in 2021. Military residents, international medical graduates, and residents not listed on their department's website were excluded. Residents were categorized as both high (≥2 publications) or low (<2 publications) publishers according to their pre-residency publications. They were also categorized based on their program's Jones et al. research productivity ranking. Results: For the 758 residents, the median number of publications was 0 (Interquartile Range [IQR]: 0-2) and 3 (IQR: 1-6) before and during residency, respectively. High publishing medical students had more publications during training than low publishers (6 [IQR: 3-14] and 2 [IQR: 1-4], p < 0.001). Residents at higher ranked programs also had more publications (4 [IQR: 2-9] and 2 [IQR: 0-4], p < 0.001). High publishing students now training at lower ranked institutions had more publications during residency than low publishers who trained at more productive institutions (4 [IQR: 1-9] and 3 [IQR: 1-6], p < 0.001). Conclusion: Having 2 or more publications before residency is correlated with an increased number of publications during residency. While attending a higher academically productive program is associated with increased resident publications, a high publishing medical student would be expected to have more publications during residency than a low publishing student, regardless of program rank. Notably, most matched applicants continue to have zero publications before matriculation.
RESUMO
INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of information on the bone remodeling that occurs distal to the femoral stem following total hip arthroplasty as most previous studies have focused on proximal changes. In this study, we report the cortical thinning that occur distal to the femoral stem after primary total hip arthroplasty. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed at one institution over a 5-year period. 156 primary total hip arthroplasty procedures were included. The Cortical Thickness Index (CTI) was measured on both operative and non-operative hips at 1 cm, 3 cm and 5 cm below the prosthetic stem tip on anteroposterior radiographic images pre-operatively as well as at 6 months, 12 months and 24 months post-operatively. The difference in average CTI was measured using paired t-tests. RESULTS: There were statistically significant decreases in CTI distal to the femoral stem at 12 months and 24 months (-1.3% and -2.8%, respectively). Greater losses were seen in female patients, patients older than 75, and patients with BMI less than 35 at 6 months postoperative. There were no differences in CTI at any time point on the non-operative side. CONCLUSION: The current study demonstrates that patients undergo bone loss as measured by CTI distal to the stem in the first 2 years following total hip arthroplasty. Comparison to the contralateral non-operative side confirms that this change is greater than expected for the natural aging process. A greater understanding of these changes will help optimize post-operative management and direct future innovations in implant design.
