Surgical templates for inguinal lymph node dissection in cN0 penile cancer: A comparative study.

PURPOSE: Modified and superficial inguinal lymph node dissection (MILD and SILD) are the 2 widely used templates for surgical staging of clinically node negative (cN0) penile cancer (PeCa); however, no previous reports have compared their outcomes. We compared these 2 surgical templates for oncological outcomes and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed records of cN0 PeCa patients who underwent MILD/SILD at our cancer care center from January 2013 to December 2019. Patients who developed a penile recurrence during follow up were excluded from analysis of oncological outcomes. The 2 groups (MILD and SILD) were compared for baseline clinico-pathological characteristics. The primary outcome was the groin recurrence free survival (gRFS). Secondary outcomes included the false negative rate (FNR) and disease free survival (DFS) for both templates and also the post-operative wound related complication. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients with intermediate and high risk N0 PeCa, 74 (50.7%) and 72 (49.3%) underwent MILD and SILD respectively. The 2 groups were comparable with regards to the distribution of T stage, tumor grade and the proportion of intermediate and high-risk patients. At a median follow up of 34 months (47 for SILD and 23 for MILD), a total of 5 groin recurrences were encountered; all of them occurred in the MILD group. The gRFS and DFS for the MILD group was 93.2% and 91.8% respectively; while that for the SILD group was 100% and 94.4% respectively. Too few events had occurred to determine any statistically significant difference. The FNR for MILD and SILD was 26.3% and 0% respectively. The overall complication rate was significantly higher in the SILD group (46% vs 20.3%, p=0.001), especially for Clavien Dindo 3A complications. CONCLUSION: MILD can fail to pick up micro-metastatic disease in a small proportion of cN0 PeCa patients, while SILD provides better oncological clearance with no groin recurrences. This oncological superiority comes at the cost of a higher incidence of wound-related complications.

Patterns of Utilization and Outcomes of Perioperative Chemotherapy in Patients With Locally Advanced-urothelial Bladder Cancer (LABC)-Real World Data From an Indian Tertiary Care Cancer Center.

AIM: Optimal utilization of perioperative systemic therapy in locally advanced bladder cancer (LABC) holds the key in improving the survival outcomes. We aim to analyze the oncological outcomes of clinically locally advanced urothelial bladder cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant (NACT) or adjuvant chemotherapy or without any systemic therapy in the perioperative period of radical cystectomy. METHODS & MATERIAL: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records of patients with cancer of the urinary bladder diagnosed between 2012 and 2020. The demographic profile, and the treatment received, was recorded for all patients. Oncological outcomes of the patients based on these variables were analyzed. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty nine (229) locally advanced bladder cancer patients were included in the study. Eighty eight (38%) of them underwent upfront radical cystectomy and 141 (62%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). With a median follow-up of 27 months, the 2-year DFS in either of the groups was 65.4% and 67.1% respectively (P - 0.373). In the multivariate analysis, the pathological lymph nodal status and lymph vascular invasion (LVI) status influenced the DFS. The initial modality of management chosen did not affect the outcome. (HR - 0.688; 95% CI: 0.38-1.21). The commonest reason for not receiving NACT was Cisplatin ineligibility due to malignant obstructive uropathy and a subgroup analysis of this set of patients also did not show any significant difference in 2 year DFS compared to those who received NACT. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of patients with LABC are unable to receive the recommended neoadjuvant chemotherapy and obstructive uropathy is the commonest reason for this in our centre. In our single centre series upfront radical cystectomy followed by adjuvant platinum based therapy had an outcome similar to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LABC patients, in patients who were unable to receive the same due to various reasons.

Blood testis barrier revisited-Analysis of post-chemotherapy germ cell tumor orchidectomy and retroperitoneal lymph node dissection specimens.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the response of chemotherapy on the primary tumor, compare it with the response in retroperitoneal disease, and study factors associated with pathological complete response. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective audit of all high inguinal orchidectomies (HIOs) performed after chemotherapy between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary cancer center in India. Patient characteristics and histopathological response were extracted from electronic medical records, and predictors of testicular disease response were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 260 retroperitoneal lymph node dissections (RPLNDs) performed in the study period, 37 HIOs (14.23%) were carried out after chemotherapy. The median age of presentation was 28 years (16-41). Histopathology was divided into a viable tumor, mature teratoma, and necrosis/scarring. Residual disease was seen in 17 RPLND (46.0%) and 18 HIO (48.6%) specimens respectively. Of these 18, three patients had a residual viable tumor in the testis, and the remaining had a mature teratoma. Clinico-radiological assessment showed an average reduction of 61% in testicular disease size following chemotherapy. On orchidectomy histopathological assessment, the median tumor size was 9, 4, and 1.5 cm in specimens with a viable tumor, mature teratoma, and necrosis/scarring, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: A low threshold for upfront chemotherapy in patients with a high disease burden may be considered as tumors within the testis respond to chemotherapy in more than half of the patients. Discordance rates of residual cancer in RPLND and HIO specimens exist but post-chemotherapy tumor size in testis correlates with the presence of a residual viable tumor.