Outcomes of toric intraocular lens realignment surgery done using slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method.

Purpose: To compare the slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method based on outcomes of toric realignment surgeries. Settings: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital. Design: Retrospective study. Methods: This study included all eyes undergoing toric intraocular lens (TIOL) realignment surgery between January 2019 and December 2021 for which TIOL axis assessment by slit-lamp method and wavefront aberrometry method was available. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods on postoperative day 1 and day 14. In patients with misalignment, TIOL was realigned to the original position in group 1 (27 patients) and to an axis based on calculations provided by wavefront aberrometer in group 2 (25 patients). Post-realignment surgery, UCVA, subjective refraction, and TIOL axis by slit-lamp and wavefront aberrometry methods were assessed and analyzed. Results: We analyzed 52 eyes and found that the mean preoperative misalignment with the slit-lamp method (44.9° ±20.0°) and wavefront aberrometry (47.1° ±19.5°) was similar. The corresponding degrees of misalignment post-TIOL repositioning surgeries were 5.2° ±5.2° (slit-lamp method) and 4.7° ±5.1° (wavefront aberrometry) (P = 0.615). Both groups showed significant improvement in median log of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) UCVA and reduction in median refractive cylinder. Conclusions: Slit-lamp method is as good as wavefront aberrometer method to assess TIOL axis. Toric realignment surgery is found to be safe, and realigning TIOL based on either slit-lamp method or wavefront aberrometer method equally improved UCVA and decreased residual refractive cylinder.

An objective evaluation of simulated surgical outcomes among surgical trainees using manual small-incision cataract surgery virtual reality simulator.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate trainee performance across six modules of a virtual reality (VR) simulator. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted on 10 manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) trainees who practiced cataract surgery on an MSICS VR simulator for one month. They were assessed in six major steps which included scleral groove, tunnel dissection, keratome entry, capsulorhexis, nucleus delivery, and intraocular lens (IOL) insertion under a trainer's supervision. The information included in their score metrics was collected, and their overall performance was evaluated. Results: Thirty attempts were evaluated for scleral groove, tunnel dissection, and capsulorhexis and 15 attempts for keratome entry. Candidates had varied results in the dimensional aspects and their rates of complications with a mean satisfactory score of 3.1 ± 4.17, 6.8 ± 5.75, 5.8 ± 7.74, and 1.8 ± 2.57, respectively. Nucleus delivery (n = 5) had more of iris pull and IOL insertion (n = 5) had more of lost IOL as complications but both had a higher satisfactory outcome. Conclusion: A VR simulator is a useful tool for training surgeons before their entry into live surgery. It is an effective method for evaluating objectively the structural characteristics of each phase in MSICS and their associated complications, helping them anticipate it earlier during live surgery by giving them a near real world experience.

Iridodialysis repair - A simplified approach.

BACKGROUND: Iris root is the thinnest and weakest portion of the iris stroma. It can detach easily due to blunt trauma or accidental engagement of the iris during intraocular surgery resulting in glare, photophobia and monocular diplopia. Multiple techniques described for iridodialysis repair such as hang back technique, stroke and dock technique and sewing machine technique are technically challenging. PURPOSE: To describe an simplified approach of iridodialysis repair using 9-0 prolene suture. SYNOPSIS: We demonstrate the technique of iridodialysis repair using animation for better understanding. Scleral flap is made adjacent to the iridodialysis area and a paracentesis is made oppsite to the iridodialysis. One arm of the double armed straight needle with 9-0 prolene suture is passed through the paracentesis into the iris root and docked in the 26G needle which is passed underneath the scleral flap 1.5mm posterior to the limbus. Then the needle is pulled out underneath the scleral flap and the manoeuvre is repeated for the second arm as well. The sutures are secured with 5-6 knots under the scleral flap. Intra-operative surgical videos of two patients with traumatic cataract and iridodialysis following blunt trauma are shown. After stabilizing the detached iris using iris hooks, phacoemlsification is done with implantation of foldable acrylic IOL, followed by iridodialysis repair as described above. Both the patients were relieved of their pre-operative symtoms and had good visual recovery. HIGHLIGHTS: We describe a simplified approach of iridodialysis repair that can significantly reduce the patient's troublesome symptoms such as glare and monocular double vision. ONLINE VIDEO LINK: https://youtu.be/-axYnSfWSb0.

Outcomes of manual small incision cataract surgery and phacoemulsification in eyes with chorioretinal coloboma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate outcomes of manual small-incision cataract surgery (MSICS) and phacoemulsification in eyes with chorioretinal coloboma. SETTING: Tertiary eye center, South India. DESIGN: Retrospective study. METHODS: Electronic medical records of 71 patients with chorioretinal coloboma undergoing cataract surgery from January 2017 to December 2019 were evaluated. Demographics, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), slitlamp biomicroscopy findings, grade of cataract, type of coloboma and associated posterior segment pathology, outcomes of different surgical techniques and risk factors for poor visual outcomes, and intraoperative complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 78 eyes studied, 53.9% eyes achieved visual outcome of 20/40 or greater and 20.5% eyes achieved CDVA less than 20/200. For the MSICS group, the median preoperative CDVA was 1.78 (interquartile range [IQR] 1.08 to 2.60) logMAR), which improved to 0.60 (IQR 0.30-1.08) logMAR postoperatively. In phacoemulsification group, the CDVA improved from 0.78 (IQR 0.60-1.00) logMAR to 0.18 (IQR 0.18-0.30) logMAR. Statistically significant visual improvement was noticed in both groups (P < .001 in both). However, eyes that underwent phacoemulsification showed better visual recovery (P < .001). The mean age at presentation was 49.7 ± 10.8 years. MSICS was the most commonly performed surgery (61.54%), and 62 eyes had uneventful cataract surgery. Twelve eyes in MSICS group and 4 eyes in phacoemulsification group had intraoperative complications. Poor visual outcome was associated with male sex, microcornea, hard cataracts, and macular involvement of coloboma. CONCLUSIONS: MSICS is an alternative to phacoemulsification in colobomatous eyes with advanced cataract. Hard cataract and microcornea were risk factors for intraoperative complications. Significant postoperative improvement in CDVA was noticed in both macula involved and macula not involved groups.

Retrospective analysis of visual outcomes in retropupillary iris-suture-fixated rigid intraocular lens in a tertiary eye center in southern India.

PURPOSE: To report clinical outcomes of retropupillary iris-suture-fixated rigid intraocular lens (IFIOL) SETTING: Tertiary care ophthalmic hospital DESIGN: Retrospective study METHODS: This study included all eyes undergoing IFIOL with a minimum follow-up of 6 months between April 2017 and January 2019. Patients with preexisting anterior or posterior segment pathologies causing defective vision, uveitis or history of previous intraocular surgeries with exception of cataract surgery were excluded from the study. Data were retrieved from electronic medical records, and we documented demographics, history, position of cataractous lens or IOL, primary/secondary surgery and its complications. Postoperative visual acuity, pupillary response, diplopia, centration of IOL, inflammation were also recorded at the baseline visit and at 1 month, 3 months and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: One hundred and ten eyes of 110 patients that underwent IFIOL were evaluated. Twenty-two patients (20%) underwent primary IFIOL, whereas 67 (60.9%) patients had secondary IFIOL. In 18 patients (16.36%), IFIOL was done to reposition decentered/dislocated IOLs. At the final follow-up, there was a significant improvement in corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) with 87 patients (79.09%) achieving CDVA of 6/12 or better. IFIOL was stable and centered in 101 eyes (91.81%). Two patients (1.81%) had intraoperative complications. Postoperative iritis was seen in 7 patients (6.36%), and 4 patients (3.63%) had rise in IOP. CONCLUSION: This is a safe, reliable, reproducible technique for aphakia rehabilitation and decentered IOL stabilization with good clinical outcome, especially in a limited resource setting.