Prevention Strategy for Ulcer Recurrence in Patients with Type II Diabetes Mellitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study.

Background: Many strategies exist to prevent diabetic ulcer recurrence, yet an effective method does not currently exist. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a prevention strategy to reduce ulcer recurrence in patients with Diabetes Mellitus (DM). Materials and Methods: A quasi-experimental, two group study was undertaken with 60 participants with type 2 DM. Two trained nurses participated in this study as study assistants. Participants were divided into two groups: the intervention group received preventive treatment, including examination and assessment, foot care, and an educational program; the control group received standard care using the five pillars of DM management in Indonesia. Results: An equal number of men (n = 30) and women (n = 30) participated in this study. Neuropathy was noted in 76.70% and 56.70% of patients in the intervention and control groups, respectively. Furthermore, 63.30% of patients in the control group and 56.70% in the intervention group had foot deformities. The recurrence rate was lower in the intervention group (13.30%) than in the control group (33.30%). Moreover, 83.30% in the control group and 76.70% in the intervention group did not smoke. The duration of DM in both groups was >9 years (50% in the intervention and 43.30% in the control group). There were no significant differences between the two groups, with mean (SD) in age (t29 = -0.87, p = 0.389), ankle-brachial index (t29 = -1.05, p = 0.144), and HbA1C (t26 = -0.35, p = 0.733). Conclusions: Prevention strategies combining examination and assessment, foot care, and educational programs can reduce ulcer recurrence in diabetic patients.

The Validity and Efficacy of a Preventative Intervention Model for Reducing Ulcer Recurrence in Diabetic Patients in Indonesia.

Introduction: It is important to reduce foot problems by preventing the recurrence of ulcers in diabetes mellitus (DM) patients. In Indonesia, interventions for the prevention of ulcer recurrence remain scarce. Objective: The present study aimed to evaluate the validity and efficacy of a proposed intervention model for preventing the recurrence of ulcers in DM patients. Method: Sixty-four DM patients were selected to participate in this quasi-experimental study and divided into two groups: intervention (n = 32) and control (n = 32). The intervention group received preventive treatment while the control group received standard care. Two trained nurses supported this study. Results: Of the 32 participants in the intervention group, 18 (56.20%) were male, 25 (78.10%) were non-smokers, 23 (71.90%) had neuropathy, 14 (43.80%) had foot deformities, four (12.50%) had recurring ulcers, and 20 (62.50%) had a previous ulcer < 12 months ago. Of the 32 participants in the control group, 17 (53.10%) were male, 26 (81.25%) were non-smokers, 17 (46.90%) had neuropathy, 19 (69.40%) had foot deformities, 12 (37.50%) had recurring ulcers, and 24 (75.00%) had a previous ulcer < 12 months ago. The mean (SD) age [62 (11.28) and 59 (11.11) years], ankle-brachial index [1.19 (0.24) and 1.11 (0.17)], HbA1C [9.18 (2.14%) and 8.91 (2.75%)], and DM duration [10.22 (6.71) and 10.13 (7.54)] of the intervention and control groups did not differ significantly. The content validity of the proposed intervention model was strong (I-CVI > 0.78). When the proposed screening tool for predicting the risk of ulcer recurrence in DM patients (NASFoHSkin) was used in the intervention group, its predictive validity, sensitivity, and specificity were 4, 100%, and 80%, respectively, while in the control group it was 4, 83%, and 80%, respectively. Conclusion: Inspection/examination, foot care, and blood glucose control can decrease ulcer recurrence in DM patients.

A diabetic foot wound healing assessment tool: A scoping review.

Background: Indonesia faces a challenge in controlling the burden of diabetic foot ulcers, which necessitates a nursing care management approach to optimize the healing of complications by accurately monitoring wound healing progress using wound assessment tools. Methods: This literature review, which is part of a scoping study framework, searched electronic databases including PubMed, ScienceDirect, EBSCOhost, and Google Scholar to find papers relevant to the Indonesian context. Five papers were chosen from a total of 463 papers discovered. Results: The diabetic foot ulcer wound assessment tools DFUAS (diabetic foot ulcer assessment scale), DMIST (deep, maceration, infection, size, and tunneling), and MUNGS (maceration, undermining, necrotic, granulation, and symptoms/signs) were identified in the literature review. For leg ulcers, LUMT (leg ulcer measurement tool) and RESVECH 2.0 (Results Expected from Chronic Wound Healing Assessment) were used. DMIST, DFUAS, and MUNGS are used to predict healed and non-healing wounds. LUMT determines the evaluation and documentation of leg ulcers, and RESVECH 2.0 is designed to shorten the duration of chronic wound occurrence. The psychometric properties of the DMIST scale were identified, including reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Conclusions: Five tools for assessing chronic wounds were identified. The predictive validity and responsiveness of the DMIST tool were supported by a sufficient rating based on evidence quality. This scoping review provides an overview of the measurement properties of available assessment tools for diabetic foot ulcers.

The SHID wound classification system for diabetic foot ulcer patients: a validity study.

This study aimed to evaluate the predictive validity of the SHID (Suriadi, Haryanto, Imran dan Defa) wound classification system compared to TU (Texas University) and Wagner wound classification systems in Indonesia. A prospective cohort study included patients with diabetic foot ulcers at Kitamura wound clinic in Indonesia. A total of 111 diabetic foot ulcer patients were assessed with SHID, TU, and Wagner wound classification systems. Two postgraduate nursing students assessed 111 wounds of bedside patients and observed them for 4 weeks. The predictive validity test indicated that the cut-off score of ≤grade 2 for SHID was 74% and 97%, ≤grade IB for TU was 77% and 92%, then ≤grade 2 for Wagner was 84% and 71% for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The area under the curve (AUC) in SHID, TU, and Wagner tools was 0.90 (95% CI: 0.828-0.950), 0.85 (95% CI: I0.766-0.910), and 0.86 (95% CI: 0.775-0.917), respectively. The Youden index for SHID, TU, and Wagner was 0.72%, 0.70%, and 0.55%, respectively. The wound classification systems are good tools for identifying diabetic foot ulcers. However, the newly developed SHID tool produced the best AUC and Youden Index values compared to the Wagner tool.