Infrarenal versus supraceliac aorto-hepatic arterial revascularisation in adult liver transplantation: multicentre retrospective study.

When the standard arterial reconstruction is not feasible during liver transplantation (LT), aorto-hepatic arterial reconstruction (AHAR) can be the only solution to save the graft. AHAR can be performed on the infrarenal (IR) or supraceliac (SC) tract of the aorta, but the possible effect on outcome of selecting SC versus IR reconstruction is still unclear. One hundred and twenty consecutive patients who underwent liver transplantation with AHAR in six European centres between January 2003 and December 2018 were retrospectively analysed to ascertain whether the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) was influenced by the type of AHAR (IR-AHAR vs. SC-AHAR). In 56/120 (46.6%) cases, an IR anastomosis was performed, always using an interposition arterial conduit. In the other 64/120 (53.4%) cases, an SC anastomosis was performed; an arterial conduit was used in 45/64 (70.3%) cases. Incidence of early (≤ 30 days) HAT was in 6.2% (4/64) in the SC-AHAR and 10.7% (6/56) IR-AHAR group (p = 0.512) whilst incidence of late HAT was significantly lower in the SC-AHAR group (4.7% (3/64) vs 19.6% (11/56) - p = 0.024). IR-AHAR was the only independent risk factor for HAT (exp[B] = 3.915; 95% CI 1.400-10.951; p = 0.009). When AHAR is necessary at liver transplantation, the use of the supraceliac aorta significantly reduces the incidence of hepatic artery thrombosis and should therefore be recommended whenever possible.

Kidney Transplantation in Elderly Recipients: A Single-Center Experience.

In this retrospective single-center study we evaluated the outcome after kidney transplant in recipients older than 65 years in terms of patient and graft survival and causes of death. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 2016, 109 consecutive first single kidney transplants in recipients older than 65 years were included. Furthermore, 2 age groups have also been identified (group A, 65-70 years old vs group B, 71-76 years old). Donor and recipient characteristics were analyzed. Other parameters were cold and warm ischemia times, delayed graft function, biopsy-proven acute rejection, and causes of death. Induction immunosuppressive therapy was performed with basiliximab or thymoglobulin. Baseline triple immunosuppression included calcineurin inhibitor, antimetabolite, and steroids. The results of preimplantation biopsies, which were performed in all expanded criteria donors were analyzed and graded according to Karpinski 2009 classification. RESULTS: Overall mortality was 39.4%: 23.2% women and 76.8% men. Causes of death were infections in 42%, tumors in 23%, cardiovascular disease in 14%, cerebrovascular disease in 7%, and unknown in 14%. The most common cause of death in men was infections (52%), and the most common cause in women was tumors (55%). At 1, 3, 5, and 10 years, overall patient survival was 89%, 84%, 72%, and 45%, and overall graft survival was 100%, 97%, 89%, and 84%, respectively. Patient and graft survival were statistically different between group A vs group B (P = .006 and P = .02, respectively). At univariate analysis significant risk factors for increased mortality were age, delayed graft function, and cold ischemia time. At multivariate analysis, delayed graft function maintained statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Kidney transplantation in patients older than 65 years is safe, feasible, and has good graft survival. Mortality is statistically significant in patients older than 71 years, despite a persistent low graft loss.

Splenic Artery Syndrome as a Possible Cause of Late Onset Refractory Ascites After Liver Transplantation: Management With Proximal Splenic Artery Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Portal hyperperfusion (PHP) is a hemodynamic condition which may develop after liver transplantation and cause refractory ascites (RA). The diagnosis is established by exclusion of other causes of increased sinusoidal pressure/resistance such as cellular rejection or toxicity and outflow obstruction. PHP as part of the pathogenesis of the splenic artery syndrome (SAS) can be treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE). METHODS: This is a retrospective study on a cohort of first-time whole-size liver transplant recipients diagnosed with RA due to PHP and treated by proximal SAE (pSAE) at the Liver Transplant Unit of the University Hospital of Udine between 2004 and 2014. RESULTS: For this study, 23 patients were identified (prevalence 8%) and treated. Preliminary clinical workup to diagnose SAS was based on exclusion of other possible causes of RA with graft biopsy, cavogram with hepatic venous pressure measurement, computed tomography scan, and angiography. The pSAE was performed 110 ± 61 days after transplantation, and no procedure-related complications occurred. pSAE resulted in a significant decrease of portal vein velocity (P = .01) and wedge hepatic venous pressure (P = .03). The diameter of the spleen showed a slightly significant reduction (P = .047); no modification of hepatic artery resistive index were encountered (P = .34). Moreover, pSAE determined the resolution of RA in all cases. CONCLUSIONS: pSAE is a safe and effective procedure to modulate the hepatic inflow and thus to treat RA secondary to SAS, with a low incidence of complications and a high rate of clinical response.

Postsplenectomy recurrence of idiopathic thrombocitopenic purpura: role of laparoscopic splenectomy in the treatment of accessory spleen.

AIM: Idiopatic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is the most common indication for splenectomy. The failure rate of surgery is about 8% and the failure rate after splenectomy is approximately 28% for all patients. When the presence of an accessory spleen is diagnosed, splenectomy is recommended. Laparoscopic approach is considered the first choice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: At our Department, between July and November 2011 two patients underwent laparoscopic accessory splenectomy for recurrence of ITP. Both patients had a previously laparoscopic splenectomy. Preoperative Magnetic Resonance (MR) was performed in both the cases revealing the presence of an accessory spleen. RESULTS: The operative time was 105 and 100 minutes respectively. No perioperative complications occured. Hospital stay was four days in both cases. The first patient had a disease free period of two months; the second one of one month. Both patients restarted immunosuppressive therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The relapse of thrombocytopenia post-splenectomy can be associated with the presence of an accessory spleen. The laparoscopic accessory splenectomy should be considered the first choice approach. Surgical accessory splenectomy allows a transitory remission of the disease.