Predicting Infection Related Complications After Endovascular Repair of Infective Native Aortic Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) as surgical treatment for infective native aortic aneurysm (INAA) is associated with superior survival compared with open surgery, but with the risk of infection related complications (IRCs). This study aimed to assess the association between baseline clinical and computed tomography (CT) features and the risk of post-operative IRCs in patients treated with EVAR for INAA. It also sought to develop a model to predict long term IRCs in patients with abdominal INAA treated with EVAR. METHODS: All initial clinical details and CT examinations of INAAs between 2005 and 2020 at a major referral hospital were reviewed retrospectively. The images were scrutinised according to aneurysm features, as well as peri-aortic and surrounding organ involvement. Data on post-operative IRCs were found in the patient records. Cox regression analysis was used to derive predictors for IRCs and develop a model to predict five year IRCs after EVAR in abdominal INAA. RESULTS: Of 3 780 patients with the diagnosis of aortic aneurysm or aortitis, 98 (3%) patients were treated with EVAR for abdominal INAAs and were thus included. The mean follow up time was 52 months (range 0 ‒ 163). The mean transaxial diameter was 6.5 ± 2.4 cm (range 2.1 ‒14.7). In the enrolled patients, 38 (39%) presented with rupture. The five year IRC rate in abdominal INAAs was 26%. Female sex, renal insufficiency, positive blood culture, aneurysm diameter, and psoas muscle involvement were predictive of five year IRC in abdominal INAA after EVAR. The model had a C-index of 0.76 (95% CI 0.66 - 0.87). CONCLUSION: Pre-operative clinical and CT features have the potential to predict IRC after endovascular aortic repair in INAA patients. These findings stress the importance of rigorous clinical, laboratory, and radiological follow up in these patients.

A Single Center Study on the Risks of Peri-Intervention Stroke in Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair (TEVAR) and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Repair (EVAR).

(1) Background: The risk factors of peri-intervention stroke (PIS) in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and endovascular abdominal aortic repair (EVAR) are different. This study aimed to compare the risks of PIS in both interventions. (2) Methods: Patients who had suffered a PIS related to TEVAR or EVAR from January 2008 to June 2015 in Songklanagarind Hospital were selected as the cases, while patients who had not suffered PIS were randomly selected to create a 1:4 case: control ratio for analysis. The associations between the factors from pre- to post-intervention and PISs in TEVAR or EVAR cases were analyzed by univariable analysis (p < 0.1). The independent risks of PIS were identified by multivariable analysis and presented in odds ratios (p < 0.05). (3) Results: A total of 17 (2.2%) out of 777 patients who had undergone TEVAR or EVAR experienced PIS, of which 9/518 (1.7%) and 8/259 (3.1%) cases were in TEVAR and EVAR groups, respectively. PIS developed within the first 24 h in nine (52.9%) cases. Large vessel ischemic stroke or watershed infarctions were the most common etiologies of PIS. The independent risks of PIS were the volume of intra-intervention blood loss (1.99 (1.88-21.12), p < 0.001) in the TEVAR-related PIS, and intervention time (2.16 (1.95-2.37), p = 0.010) and post-intervention hyperglycemia (18.60 (1.60-216.06), p = 0.001) in the EVAR-related PIS. There were no differences in the rate of PIS among the operators, intervention techniques, and status of the interventions performed. (4) Conclusion: The risks of PIS in TEVAR or EVAR in our center were different and possibly independent of the operator expertise and intervention techniques.

Results of drug-eluting stent in significant restenosis of the hemodialysis access: An initial study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to report the 12-month results of drug-eluting stent (DES) for the treatment of significant restenosis of the hemodialysis access. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 14 patients (seven men and seven women; median age 70 years; range of 50-83 years) with significant restenosis of hemodialysis accesses were enrolled from January 2017 to December 2018. A total of 10 arteriovenous graft (AVG) and four arteriovenous fistulae were treated with DES. Study outcomes included primary patency of the target lesion and circuit. RESULTS: Venous anastomosis of the AVG was the most common target lesion for DES insertion (nine hemodialysis accesses). The range of follow-up time was 12-36 months. Primary patency rates of target lesion before DES (patency for last conventional balloon angioplasty [CBA]) versus target lesion after DES at 6 and 12 months were 29% versus 100% and 7% versus 86% (p < 0.001). Primary patency rates of pre-DES circuit (patency for last CBA) versus post-DES circuit at 6 and 12 months were 29% versus 64% and 7% versus 29%, respectively (p = 0.058). CONCLUSION: DES might improve the patency rate of target lesion in patients with significant restenosis of the hemodialysis access.

Visceral branch occlusion following aneurysm repair using multibranched thoracoabdominal stent-grafts.

PURPOSE: To identify risk factors for late-occurring branch occlusion following multibranched endovascular repair of thoracoabdominal and pararenal aortic aneurysm. METHOD: Out of 120 patients who underwent multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair between September 2005 and May 2013, 100 (78 men; mean age 72.4 ± 7.4 years) met the criteria for inclusion in the current retrospective analysis. Demographic data were gleaned from a prospectively maintained database. Mean aneurysm diameter was 66.7 ± 11.7 mm. Multiplanar reconstructions of postoperative computed tomographic angiography were used to measure 6 parameters of renal branch morphology. RESULTS: All 100 patients had undergone successful placement of multibranched aortic stent-grafts with a total of 95 celiac branches, 100 superior mesenteric artery (SMA) branches, and 187 renal branches. During a mean follow-up of 25.6 months, there were no stent fractures or stent separations, no SMA occlusions, and only 2 (2.1%) celiac artery occlusions, neither of which required reintervention. In contrast, there were 18 (9.6%) renal branch occlusions in 16 patients, all men (p=0.02). Patients with renal branch occlusions were significantly more likely to have a history of myocardial infarction (p=0.004). The mean renal artery length was significantly greater in the occlusion group compared to the non-occlusion group (47.5 ± 13.6 vs. 39.4 ± 14.2, p=0.03). No other aspect of branch morphology was significantly different between the occlusion and non-occlusion groups. CONCLUSION: Renal branch occlusion was by far the commonest late failure mode after multibranched endovascular aneurysm repair. The current study provides no basis for a change in patient selection or stent-graft design, only a change in the components used to construct renal branches. It is too early to tell the effect this will have.

Endovascular therapy for infected aortic aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the outcome of endovascular therapy for an infected aortic aneurysm in patients with or without aorto-aerodigestive/aortocaval fistulas. METHODS: From September 2005 to May 2010, 21 patients, 17 abdominal and four thoracic infected aortic aneurysms were treated with an endovascular stent graft at Songklanagarind Hospital, Thailand. Five patients presented with fistula complications, 1 aortoesophageal, 1 aortobronchial, 1 aortocaval, and 2 aortoenteric fistulas. Lifelong antibiotics were planned for all patients. In-hospital mortality and follow-up outcomes were examined. RESULTS: The average age was 66 years (range, 42-84) and 18 patients were male. All five cases in the fistulous group presented with symptoms related to the organs involved, four massive bleedings and one congestive heart failure. Symptoms of patients in the nonfistulous group were abdominal, back, or chest pain in 94%, fever in 81%, and diarrhea in 19%. Blood culture was positive in 10 patients (48%): eight Salmonella spp and two Burkholderia pseudomallei. The overall in-hospital mortality was 19% (4/21): 60% (3/5) in the fistula group and only 6% (1/16) in the nonfistula group. One conversion to open repair was performed in the fistula group 2 weeks after the endovascular procedure. During the follow-up period, one of the two survivors in the fistula group died at 18 months from unrelated causes, while there were no deaths in the 15 patients of the nonfistula group with an average patient follow-up of 22 months (range, 1-54). Periaortic inflammation and aneurysms in the nonfistula group completely disappeared in 10 of the 15 patients (67%). The aneurysm significantly shrunk in four patients (27%), and was stable at 1 month in one patient. There were no late conversions. CONCLUSION: Endovascular therapy, as a definite treatment for infected aortic aneurysms, provided excellent short- and medium-term results in patients without fistula complications. However, a poorer outcome was evident in patients with fistula complications.