A randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial of folic acid supplementation of cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease.

OBJECTIVES: (1) to assess the effect of 1 mg folic acid supplementation of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChI) in a 6 month double-blind placebo-controlled study of patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) and (2) to assess whether outcome measures were affected by changes in homocysteine levels. METHOD: Fifty-seven consecutive outpatients with probable AD were treated concurrently with a ChI and either folic acid or placebo. None had conditions or medication known to interfere with folate metabolism. Fasting folate and homocysteine levels were measured prior to commencing ChI and 6 months later. Response was categorised using criteria of the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE). RESULTS: Twelve males and 29 females completed treatment (mean age 76.27 SD 6.23 years, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) 23.49 SD 3.53, baseline homocysteine 18.39 SD 4.62 micromoles per litre). 23 received folic acid and 18 placebo. There were no significant baseline differences or use of individual ChI between the two arms. After 6 months a significant difference was seen in the change from baseline in combined Instrumental Activities of Daily Living and Social Behaviour scores between arms (folate+1.50 (SD 5.32) vs placebo -2.29 (SD 6.16) (p=0.03) but not change in MMSE scores. Sixteen of 23 subjects receiving folic acid and 7/18 placebo subjects were classified as NICE responders (p=0.05). CONCLUSION: This pilot double blind study suggests that response to ChI in patients with AD may be improved by the use of folic acid. The relationship between any change in homocysteine levels and response to treatment is discussed.

Hypertension, white matter change and response to cholinesterase inhibitors in Alzheimer's disease.

BACKGROUND: Cholinesterase inhibitors are used to treat mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease. Their role in patients with concurrent cerebrovascular disease has been less well studied, and the influence of vascular risk factors on response to treatment is uncertain. We investigated the effect of hypertension and white matter lesions (WML) on response. METHODS: A retrospective sample of 160 consecutive out-patients who had blood pressure measured and the presence or absence of WML recorded at baseline and who completed six months treatment with a cholinesterase inhibitor was studied. Subjects scored either zero or one on the Modified Hachinski Ischaemic Scale. Subjects were assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the Digit Symbol Substitution test (DSST) and both the Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) and Social Behaviour (SB) sub-scales of the Nurses Observation Scale for Geriatric Patients (NOSGER). RESULTS: 43.9% of the total study population were classified as good responders using our criteria. Neither the presence of hypertension nor the presence of WML alone influenced outcome. However, there was a statistically significant interaction between blood pressure and WML on outcome variables on multiple analysis of variance (MANOVA) (F(4, 139) = 5.60, p < 0.0005). Subjects with both hypertension and WML deteriorate to a significantly greater extent in IADL and SB scores than any other group (p < 0.05 in each case). This effect could not be explained by age or by smoking status. CONCLUSION: Our results support the hypothesis that there is an interaction between hypertension and WML that adversely influences functional change during cholinesterase inhibitor treatment. Our results are a contrast to suggestions that subjects with vascular disease show a better response to cholinesterase inhibitors. We recommend careful exploration of factors that may influence outcome.

Current smoking and response to cholinesterase inhibitor therapy in Alzheimer's disease.

Current smoking has been suggested as predicting poor response to cholinesterase inhibitor treatment. This observational study compares response in subjects with NINCDS-ADRDA 'probable' Alzheimer's disease who are current smokers and subjects who are non-smokers. Smoking status was not associated with response. Smokers were significantly more likely to improve Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) scores following treatment. In non-smokers, improvement from baseline DSST scores was associated with good response but this was not the case in smokers. The change in the DSST is in keeping with smokers having increased numbers of nicotinic receptors. In smokers, the lack of association between improvement in DSST scores and good response may be representative of inhibitory properties of cigarette smoke that are unrelated to nicotine.