Facilitators and Barriers to Expedited Partner Therapy: Results From a Survey of Family Physicians.

BACKGROUND: Expedited partner therapy (EPT) can prevent transmission of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and reinfection of the index patient. We surveyed family physicians (FPs) in British Columbia to understand their perceptions of barriers and facilitators to EPT use and explored how perceptions varied by demographic and practice characteristics. METHODS: Survey participants were recruited through the Divisions of Family Practice, which include greater than 90% of FPs in British Columbia. Common barriers and facilitators for EPT were identified using descriptive statistics. The association between each EPT barrier and facilitator and demographic and practice characteristics were tested using χ test. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-one FPs started the survey, of which 146 (80.7%) answered 10 questions or more and were analyzed. Overall, inaccurate information about sex partners (88 [60.3%] of 146) and medicolegal concerns (87 [59.6%] of 146) were the most common barriers reported. Family physicians in nonurban settings were more likely to identify insufficient time as a barrier compared with FPs in urban settings (P < 0.01). The most common facilitators were having a health care professional for follow-up after prescribing EPT (110 [75.3%] of 146), improved remuneration (93 [63.7%] of 146), clear clinical guidelines around EPT (87/146, 59.6%), and having a legal framework (92 [63.0%] of 146). Family physicians practicing for less than 9 years (the median) were more likely to identify the latter as facilitating EPT compared with FPs practicing for 9 years or longer (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ensuring patients have access to a health care professional for follow-up, improved remuneration, and development of clinical guidelines and a legal framework can support the implementation of EPT. Tools catered to different practice types and contexts may help increase EPT use.

Applying a health equity tool to assess a public health nursing guideline for practice in sexually transmitted infection assessment in British Columbia.

SETTING: There is a multitude of health equity tools but little guidance on how to effectively use these tools in public health nursing practice. In BC, public health nurses who are certified in sexually transmitted infection care utilize guidelines authorized by the nursing regulatory body. INTERVENTION: As part of the Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH) research project, an assessment of the nursing guideline, Sexually Transmitted Infection (STI) Assessment Decision Support Tool, was undertaken using the Assessing Equity in Clinical Practice Guidelines health equity assessment tool. The chosen tool is intended for use by health care providers, is broadly applicable to clinical practice guidelines, can be used retrospectively, and falls within the category of equity checklists and audits. OUTCOMES: Overall, the tool was useful in assessing the inclusion and omission of an equity focus in the guideline. However, there were several challenges: the identification of an appropriate health equity tool; the absence of an evaluation of the chosen tool; the tool's focus on chronic disease versus communicable disease; and the difficulty of obtaining client perspectives. IMPLICATIONS: For an improved equity lens in the STI Assessment Decision Support Tool, future revisions should be equity focused and include perspectives from affected populations, an emphasis on the determinants of health that perpetuate inequities for populations who experience a disproportionate burden of STI, information on provincially available resources, and service delivery models that improve timely and equitable access to treatment and care.

HIV diagnoses and testing patterns among young gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men: an analysis of HIV surveillance data in British Columbia, 2008-2015.

BACKGROUND: We examined changes in HIV testing indicators following a recent increase in diagnoses among young gay, bisexual and other men who have sex with men (GBMSM) in BC that accompanied implementation of a provincial HIV strategy. METHOD: Surveillance and laboratory testing data were used to compare case counts and testing characteristics among GBMSM < 30 and ≥ 30 years diagnosed in 2008-2011 and 2012-2015. We tested differences in the proportion diagnosed on first testing episode, proportion diagnosed at late stage of infection and the median inter-test interval ((ITI) time in months between last negative test and first positive test) using χ2 and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. RESULTS: In 2008-2011, 657 diagnoses were made among GBMSM: 24% among men < 30 years and 76% among men ≥ 30 years. In 2012-2015, 590 diagnoses were made: 28% among < 30 years and 28% among ≥ 30 years. Among men < 30 years, diagnoses made on first testing episode decreased (39.4% vs. 28.7% in 2012-2015; p = 0.042) and there were few late-stage diagnoses (5.1% in 2008-2011 vs. 9.1% in 2012-2015). The median ITI was 10 months in both periods. No changes were observed over time among men ≥ 30 years. However, in both periods, late-stage diagnosis was more common in men ≥ 30 years (2008-2011, 18.8%; 2012-2015, 18.6%; p < 0.01 for both). The ITI was also longer for men ≥ 30 years (2008-2011, 24.5 months; 2012-2015, 20 months; p < 0.001 for both). CONCLUSION: Testing indicators suggested better testing practices among GBMSM diagnosed at < 30 years compared to those diagnosed at older ages. However, there are clear needs for additional prevention measures in both age groups.

Critical considerations for the practical utility of health equity tools: a concept mapping study.

BACKGROUND: Promoting health equity within health systems is a priority and challenge worldwide. Health equity tools have been identified as one strategy for integrating health equity considerations into health systems. Although there has been a proliferation of health equity tools, there has been limited attention to evaluating these tools for their practicality and thus their likelihood for uptake. METHODS: Within the context of a large program of research, the Equity Lens in Public Health (ELPH), we conducted a concept mapping study to identify key elements and themes related to public health leaders and practitioners' views about what makes a health equity tool practical and useful. Concept mapping is a participatory mixed-method approach to generating ideas and concepts to address a common concern. Participants brainstormed responses to the prompt "To be useful, a health equity tool should…" After participants sorted responses into groups based on similarity and rated them for importance and feasibility, the statements were analyzed using multidimensional scaling, then grouped using cluster analysis. Pattern matching graphs were constructed to illustrate the relationship between the importance and feasibility of statements, and go-zone maps were created to guide subsequent action. RESULTS: The process resulted in 67 unique statements that were grouped into six clusters: 1) Evaluation for Improvement; 2) User Friendliness; 3) Explicit Theoretical Background; 4) Templates and Tools 5) Equity Competencies; and 6) Nothing about Me without Me- Client Engaged. The result was a set of concepts and themes describing participants' views of the practicality and usefulness of health equity tools. CONCLUSIONS: These thematic clusters highlight the importance of user friendliness and having user guides, templates and resources to enhance use of equity tools. Furthermore, participants' indicated that practicality was not enough for a tool to be useful. In addition to practical characteristics of the tool, a useful tool is one that encourages and supports the development of practitioner competencies to engage in equity work including critical reflections on power and institutional culture as well as strategies for the involvement of community members impacted by health inequities in program planning and delivery. The results of this study will be used to inform the development of practical criteria to assess health equity tools for application in public health.

A scoping review of the literature on nursing practices with persons seeking care for sexually transmitted infections.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To examine existing research literature to ascertain what is known about nursing practice in sexually transmitted infection care and identify promising research trends and limitations. BACKGROUND: Sexually transmitted infections continue to be a significant public health concern with more than 357 million new cases occurring annually worldwide. Nurses are vital for the prevention and care of those affected by sexually transmitted infections. As nursing scope of practice is evolving, there is an urgent need to develop a baseline understanding of the state of nursing knowledge in sexually transmitted infection care. DESIGN: Nurse researchers and policy and practice experts conducted a scoping review of primary research using Arksey and O'Malley's five-step methodological framework. METHODS: Primary research literature published between 2000-2014 was searched. Seventeen full-text papers were thematically analysed. Electronic charts were created for data coding and extraction. RESULTS: The research literature in nursing and sexually transmitted infection care is heterogeneous in topic, method and populations investigated. Sexually transmitted infection care is undertaken by nurses in diverse settings and roles including nurse practitioners and public health, school and emergency room nurses. Three themes that illustrate the main focus of current literature were identified: (1) screening, (2) health education and counselling and (3) scope of nursing practice. Inconsistencies in nursing practice activities in sexually transmitted infection care were noted. Many nurses are not working to their full scope of practice. CONCLUSIONS: The research in sexually transmitted infection nursing practice is limited. Further research is needed to investigate the context of practice and patient care experiences; to design and test interventions to support nurses working to full scope of practice; and to improve the conceptualisation of nursing in sexually transmitted infection care. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Nurses are effectively improving health outcomes among people affected by sexually transmitted infections; however, not working to the full scope of practice could limit our capacity to fully meet patient care needs.

Increasing Staff Pride and Patient Connection.

This column is presented by a nurse educator at the Princess Alexandra Hospital. The author reinforces the value of our professional identity as nurses. The project described in this article focused on the presence of a visible name tag and a professional introduction of the nurse to the patient to promote the development of trust.

Intermediate optimization of vision with bilateral nonaspheric multifocal intraocular lens implantation.

PURPOSE: To evaluate binocular visual function, refraction, and subjective outcomes of intermediate optimization of vision after simultaneous bilateral implantation of the nonaspheric AcrySof SA60D3 ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL). SETTING: Private clinic, Abbotsford, British Columbia, Canada. METHODS: Intermediate optimization was performed by overcorrection of 1.00 diopter (D) to induce mild myopia in the nondominant eye in patients having bilateral implantation of the multifocal IOL. Distance manifest refraction and visual acuity at several distances were determined; contrast sensitivity function (CSF), near-point stereo acuity, and subjective outcomes were assessed postoperatively at 2 weeks and 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with intended intermediate optimization and 5 patients with unintended intermediate optimization were prospectively evaluated. The mean manifest refraction spherical equivalent was stable from 2 weeks (-0.94 D+/-0.22 [SD]) to 12 months (-0.93+/-0.23 D) in the intermediate optimization eyes. Overall, postoperative mean binocular uncorrected near, intermediate, and distance visual acuities were 20/23, 20/23, and 20/22, respectively. No significant differences were found between best distance-corrected and uncorrected stereo acuity or between best distance-corrected and uncorrected binocular CSF under most conditions (P> .05). On questioning, 97% of patients had little or no difficulty seeing and were bothered occasionally or never by the visual fluctuation between the near range and intermediate range. CONCLUSION: Intermediate optimization with slight myopia in 1 eye after bilateral implantation of the multifocal IOL offered consistent good vision at all ranges, indicating it a safe option for patients who require good vision at intermediate ranges.

Visual function and change in quality of life after bilateral refractive lens exchange with the ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens.

PURPOSE: To evaluate vision and quality of life and explore the correlation between vision and change of quality of life after bilateral refractive lens exchange of the Acrysof SA60D3 ReSTOR multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) for correction of ametropia in presbyopic populations. METHODS: Pre- and postoperatively, the National Eye Institute Refractive Error Quality of Life Instrument (NEI-RQL) was self-administered by 30 consecutive refractive lens exchange patients, including 19 myopes and 11 hyperopes. The change of NEI-RQL scores was determined for each subscale covering a specific aspect of quality of life. Refraction, visual acuity, and contrast sensitivity function were evaluated 3 and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Postoperatively, all patients achieved binocular uncorrected distance and near visual acuity of 20/30 or better. Photopic contrast sensitivity function decreased significantly at high spatial frequencies (P < .05). Overall scores of expectations, activity limitations, dependence on correction, appearance, and satisfaction were significantly higher postoperatively (P < .05). Greater improvement in near vision and dependence on correction was achieved in hyperopes. However, glare scores were significantly lower postoperatively (P < .001). Lower preoperative uncorrected near visual acuity was associated with higher scores for dependence on correction in myopes (r = 0.51, P = .027), and overall patient satisfaction correlated significantly with postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (r = -0.44, P = .015). CONCLUSIONS: Refractive lens exchange with the ReSTOR IOL in presbyopic patients provided good visual function and better patient satisfaction compared with preoperative corrections. Improvement in vision-related quality of life was most evident in hyperopes. A slight reduction in contrast sensitivity function appears to have no influence on quality of life.