Sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in electroencephalographic neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital: a multicenter prospective observational study in India.

Background: Although levetiracetam and phenytoin are widely used antiseizure medications (ASM) in neonates, their efficacy on seizure freedom is unclear. We evaluated electroencephalographic (EEG) seizure freedom following sequential levetiracetam and phenytoin in neonatal seizures unresponsive to phenobarbital. Methods: We recruited neonates born ≥35 weeks and aged <72 h who had continued electrographic seizures despite phenobarbital, from three Indian hospitals, between 20 June 2020 and 31 July 2022. The neonates were treated with intravenous levetiracetam (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, second line) followed by phenytoin (20 mg/kg x 2 doses, third line) if seizures persisted. The primary outcome was complete seizure freedom, defined as an absence of seizures on EEG for at least 60 min within 40 min from the start of infusion. Findings: Of the 206 neonates with continued seizures despite phenobarbital, 152 received levetiracetam with EEG. Of these one EEG was missing, 47 (31.1%) were in status epilepticus, and primary outcome data were available in 145. Seizure freedom occurred in 20 (13.8%; 95% CI 8.6%-20.5%) after levetiracetam; 16 (80.0%) responded to the first dose and 4 (20.0%) to the second dose. Of the 125 neonates with persisting seizures after levetiracetam, 114 received phenytoin under EEG monitoring. Of these, the primary outcome data were available in 104. Seizure freedom occurred in 59 (56.7%; 95% CI 46.7%-66.4%) neonates; 54 (91.5%) responded to the first dose and 5 (8.5%) to the second dose. Interpretation: With the conventional doses, levetiracetam was associated with immediate EEG seizure cessation in only 14% of phenobarbital unresponsive neonatal seizures. Additional treatment with phenytoin along with levetiracetam attained seizure freedom in further 57%. Safety and efficacy of higher doses of levetiracetam should be evaluated in well-designed randomised controlled trials. Funding: National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Research and Innovation for Global Health Transformation (NIHR200144).

Whole-body hypothermia in mild neonatal encephalopathy: protocol for a multicentre phase III randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Mild hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy is associated with sub optimal cognition and learning difficulties at school age. Although whole-body hypothermia reduces death and disability after moderate or severe encephalopathy in high-income countries, the safety and efficacy of hypothermia in mild encephalopathy is not known. The cooling in mild encephalopathy (COMET) trial will examine if whole-body hypothermia improves cognitive development of neonates with mild encephalopathy. METHODS: The COMET trial is a phase III multicentre open label two-arm randomised controlled trial with masked outcome assessments. A total of 426 neonates with mild encephalopathy will be recruited from 50 to 60 NHS hospitals over 2 ½ years following parental consent. The neonates will be randomised to 72 h of whole-body hypothermia (33.5 ± 0.5 C) or normothermia (37.0 ± 0.5 C) within six hours or age. Prior to the recruitment front line clinical staff will be trained and certified on expanded modified Sarnat staging for encephalopathy. The neurological assessment of all screened and recruited cases will be video recorded and centrally assessed for quality assurance. If recruitment occurs at a non-cooling centre, neonates in both arms will be transferred to a cooling centre for continued care, after randomisation. All neonates will have continuous amplitude integrated electroencephalography (aEEG) at least for the first 48 h to monitor for seizures. Predefined safety outcomes will be documented, and data collected to assess resource utilization of health care. A central team masked to trial group allocation will assess neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age. The primary outcome is mean difference in composite cognitive scores on Bayley scales of Infant and Toddler development 4th Edition. DISCUSSION: The COMET trial will establish the safety and efficacy of whole-body hypothermia for mild hypoxic ischaemic encephalopathy and inform national and international guidelines in high income countries. It will also provide an economic assessment of whole-body hypothermia therapy for mild encephalopathy in the NHS on cost-effectiveness grounds. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05889507 June 5, 2023.

Whole-Body Hypothermia vs Targeted Normothermia for Neonates With Mild Encephalopathy: A Multicenter Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Although whole-body hypothermia is widely used after mild neonatal hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE), safety and efficacy have not been evaluated in randomized clinical trials (RCTs), to our knowledge. Objective: To examine the effect of 48 and 72 hours of whole-body hypothermia after mild HIE on cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) biomarkers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This open-label, 3-arm RCT was conducted between October 31, 2019, and April 28, 2023, with masked outcome analysis. Participants were neonates at 6 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in the UK and Italy born at or after 36 weeks' gestation with severe birth acidosis, requiring continued resuscitation, or with an Apgar score less than 6 at 10 minutes after birth and with evidence of mild HIE on modified Sarnat staging. Statistical analysis was per intention to treat. Interventions: Random allocation to 1 of 3 groups (1:1:1) based on age: neonates younger than 6 hours were randomized to normothermia or 72-hour hypothermia (33.5 °C), and those 6 hours or older and already receiving whole-body hypothermia were randomized to rewarming after 48 or 72 hours of hypothermia. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) concentration (mmol/kg wet weight), assessed by cerebral MR imaging and thalamic spectroscopy between 4 and 7 days after birth using harmonized sequences. Results: Of 225 eligible neonates, 101 were recruited (54 males [53.5%]); 48 (47.5%) were younger than 6 hours and 53 (52.5%) were 6 hours or older at randomization. Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight were 39.5 (1.1) weeks and 3378 (380) grams in the normothermia group (n = 34), 38.7 (0.5) weeks and 3017 (338) grams in the 48-hour hypothermia group (n = 31), and 39.0 (1.1) weeks and 3293 (252) grams in the 72-hour hypothermia group (n = 36). More neonates in the 48-hour (14 of 31 [45.2%]) and 72-hour (13 of 36 [36.1%]) groups required intubation at birth than in the normothermic group (3 of 34 [8.8%]). Ninety-nine neonates (98.0%) had MR imaging data and 87 (86.1%), NAA data. Injury scores on conventional MR biomarkers were similar across groups. The mean (SD) NAA level in the normothermia group was 10.98 (0.92) mmol/kg wet weight vs 8.36 (1.23) mmol/kg wet weight (mean difference [MD], -2.62 [95% CI, -3.34 to -1.89] mmol/kg wet weight) in the 48-hour and 9.02 (1.79) mmol/kg wet weight (MD, -1.96 [95% CI, -2.66 to -1.26] mmol/kg wet weight) in the 72-hour hypothermia group. Seizures occurred beyond 6 hours after birth in 4 neonates: 1 (2.9%) in the normothermia group, 1 (3.2%) in the 48-hour hypothermia group, and 2 (5.6%) in the 72-hour hypothermia group. Conclusions and Relevance: In this pilot RCT, whole-body hypothermia did not improve cerebral MR biomarkers after mild HIE, although neonates in the hypothermia groups were sicker at baseline. Safety and efficacy of whole-body hypothermia should be evaluated in RCTs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03409770.

Management of seizures in patients with primary mitochondrial diseases: consensus statement from the InterERNs Mitochondrial Working Group.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Primary mitochondrial diseases (PMDs) are common inborn errors of energy metabolism, with an estimated prevalence of one in 4300. These disorders typically affect tissues with high energy requirements, including heart, muscle and brain. Epilepsy may be the presenting feature of PMD, can be difficult to treat and often represents a poor prognostic feature. The aim of this study was to develop guidelines and consensus recommendations on safe medication use and seizure management in mitochondrial epilepsy. METHODS: A panel of 24 experts in mitochondrial medicine, pharmacology and epilepsy management of adults and/or children and two patient representatives from seven countries was established. Experts were members of five different European Reference Networks, known as the Mito InterERN Working Group. A Delphi technique was used to allow the panellists to consider draft recommendations on safe medication use and seizure management in mitochondrial epilepsy, using two rounds with predetermined levels of agreement. RESULTS: A high level of consensus was reached regarding the safety of 14 out of all 25 drugs reviewed, resulting in endorsement of National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidelines for seizure management, with some modifications. Exceptions including valproic acid in POLG disease, vigabatrin in patients with γ-aminobutyric acid transaminase deficiency and topiramate in patients at risk for renal tubular acidosis were highlighted. CONCLUSIONS: These consensus recommendations describe our intent to improve seizure control and reduce the risk of drug-related adverse events in individuals living with PMD-related epilepsy.

Neonatal seizures during extra corporeal membrane oxygenation support.

To evaluate EEG monitoring during neonatal ECMO and to identify any correlations between seizure detection to abnormal neuroimaging. Eight-year, service evaluation of neonates who received at least one continuous EEG (cEEG) whilst on ECMO at Great Ormond Street Hospital. Pearson's chi-square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were used to assess clinical and EEG variables association with seizures and neuroimaging findings. Fifty-seven neonates were studied; 57 cEEG recordings were reviewed. The incidence of seizures was 33% (19/57); of these 74% (14/19) were electrographic-only. The incidence of status epilepticus was 42%, (8/19 with 6 neonates having electrographic-only status and 2 electro-clinical status. Seizures were detected within an hour of recording in 84%, (16/19). The overall mortality rate was 39% (22/57). Seizure detection was strongly associated with female gender (OR 4.8, 95% CI: 1.1-20.4, p = 0.03), abnormal EEG background activity (OR 2.8, 95% CI: 1.1-7.4, p = 0.03) and abnormal EEG focal features (OR 23.6, 95% CI: 5.4-103.9, p = 0.001). There was a strong association between the presence of seizures and abnormal neuroimaging findings (OR 10.9, 95% CI: 2.8-41.9, p = 0.001). Neonates were highly likely to have abnormal neuroimaging findings in the presence of severely abnormal background EEG (OR 9.5, 95% CI 1.7-52.02, p = 0.01) and focal EEG abnormalities (OR 6.35, 95% CI 1.97-20.5, p = 0.002)Conclusion: The study highlights the importance of cEEG in neonates undergoing ECMO. An association between seizure detection and abnormal neuroimaging findings was described. What is Known: • Patients on ECMO are at a higher risk of seiures. • Continuous EEG monitoring is recommended by the ACNS for high risk and ECMO patients. What is New: • In this cohort, neonates with sezirues were 11 times more likely of having abnromal neuroimaging findings. • Neonates with burst suppressed or suppressed EEG background were 9.5 times more likely to have abnormal neuroimaging findings. What does this study add? • This study reports a 33% incidence of neonatal seizures during ECMO. • Neonates with seizures were 11 times more likely to have an abnormal brain scan. • The study captures the real-time approach of EEG monitoring. • Recommended cEEG monitoring should last at least 24 h for ECMO patients. • This is the first study to assess this in neonates only.

Temporal evolution of electrographic seizures in newborn infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy requiring therapeutic hypothermia: a secondary analysis of the ANSeR studies.

BACKGROUND: Despite extensive research on neonatal hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, detailed information about electrographic seizures during active cooling and rewarming of therapeutic hypothermia is sparse. We aimed to describe temporal evolution of seizures and determine whether there is a correlation of seizure evolution with 2-year outcome. METHODS: This secondary analysis included newborn infants recruited from eight European tertiary neonatal intensive care units for two multicentre studies (a randomised controlled trial [NCT02431780] and an observational study [NCT02160171]). Infants were born at 36+0 weeks of gestation with moderate or severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy and underwent therapeutic hypothermia with prolonged conventional video-electroencephalography (EEG) monitoring for 10 h or longer from the start of rewarming. Seizure burden characteristics were calculated based on electrographic seizures annotations: hourly seizure burden (minutes of seizures within an hour) and total seizure burden (minutes of seizures within the entire recording). We categorised infants into those with electrographic seizures during active cooling only, those with electrographic seizures during cooling and rewarming, and those without seizures. Neurodevelopmental outcomes were determined using the Bayley's Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition (BSID-III), the Griffiths Mental Development Scales (GMDS), or neurological assessment. An abnormal outcome was defined as death or neurodisability at 2 years. Neurodisability was defined as a composite score of 85 or less on any subscales for BSID-III, a total score of 87 or less for GMDS, or a diagnosis of cerebral palsy (dyskinetic cerebral palsy, spastic quadriplegia, or mixed motor impairment) or epilepsy. FINDINGS: Of 263 infants recruited between Jan 1, 2011, and Feb 7, 2017, we included 129 infants: 65 had electrographic seizures (43 during active cooling only and 22 during and after active cooling) and 64 had no seizures. Compared with infants with seizures during active cooling only, those with seizures during and after active cooling had a longer seizure period (median 12 h [IQR 3-28] vs 68 h [35-86], p<0·0001), more seizures (median 12 [IQR 5-36] vs 94 [24-134], p<0·0001), and higher total seizure burden (median 69 min [IQR 22-104] vs 167 min [54-275], p=0·0033). Hourly seizure burden peaked at about 20-24 h in both groups, and infants with seizures during and after active cooling had a secondary peak at 85 h of age. When combined, worse EEG background (major abnormalities and inactive background) at 12 h and 24 h were associated with the seizure group: compared with infants with a better EEG background (normal, mild, or moderate abnormalities), infants with a worse EEG background were more likely to have seizures after cooling at 12 h (13 [54%] of 24 vs four [14%] of 28; odds ratio 7·09 [95% CI 1·88-26·77], p=0·0039) and 24 h (14 [56%] of 25 vs seven [18%] of 38; 5·64 [1·81-17·60], p=0·0029). There was a significant relationship between EEG grade at 12 h (four categories) and seizure group (p=0·020). High total seizure burden was associated with increased odds of an abnormal outcome at 2 years of age (odds ratio 1·007 [95% CI 1·000-1·014], p=0·046), with a medium negative correlation between total seizure burden and BSID-III cognitive score (rS=-0·477, p=0·014, n=26). INTERPRETATION: Overall, half of infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy had electrographic seizures and a third of those infants had seizures beyond active cooling, with worse outcomes. These results raise the importance of prolonged EEG monitoring of newborn infants with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy not only during active cooling but throughout the rewarming phase and even longer when seizures are detected. FUNDING: Wellcome Trust, Science Foundation Ireland, and the Irish Health Research Board.

Duration of birth depression and neurodevelopmental outcomes after whole-body hypothermia for hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy in India, Sri Lanka and Bangladesh - an exploratory analysis of the HELIX trial.

Background: Effect of duration of birth depression on neurodevelopmental outcomes in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is not known. We examined the association of birth depression with brain injury, neurodevelopmental outcomes, and hypothermia after hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in south Asia. Methods: We compared cerebral magnetic resonance (MR) at 2 weeks, and adverse outcomes (death or moderate or severe disability) at 18 months in 408 babies with moderate or severe HIE who had long birth depression (positive pressure ventilation (PPV) >10 min or Apgar score<6 at 10 min or cord pH < 7.0) and short birth depression (PPV for 5-10 min or Apgar score<6 at 5 min, but ≥6 at 10 min). Findings: Long depression group (n = 201) had more severe HIE (32.8% versus 6.8%), mortality (47.5% versus 26.4%), death or disability at 18 months (62.2% versus 35.4%) (all p < 0.001), MR injury (Odds ratio; 95% CI) to basal ganglia (2.4 (1.3, 4.1); p = 0.003), posterior limb of internal capsule (2.3 (1.3, 4.3); p < 0.001) and white matter (1.7 (1.1, 2.7); p = 0.021), and lower thalamic N-acetylaspartate levels (7.69 ± 1.84 versus 8.29 ± 1.60); p = 0.031) than short depression group (n = 207). Three babies had no heartbeat at 5 min, of which 1 died and 2 survived with severe disability. No significant interaction between the duration of birth depression and whole-body hypothermia was seen for any of the MR biomarker or clinical outcomes. Interpretation: Long birth depression was associated with more brain injury and adverse outcomes than short depression. Effect of hypothermia was not modified by duration of birth depression. Funding: National Institute for Health Research.

Pharmacokinetics and safety of brivaracetam in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures: A multicenter, open-label, single-arm study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety, and tolerability of brivaracetam (BRV) in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures not controlled with previous antiseizure medications (ASMs). METHODS: Phase 2/3, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study (N01349/NCT03325439) in neonates with repeated electroencephalographic seizures (lasting ≥10 s) confirmed by video-electroencephalography, and inadequate seizure control with at least one ASM. A screening period (up to 36 h) was followed by a 48-h evaluation period during which patients received 0.5 mg/kg BRV twice daily (b.i.d) intravenously (IV). Patients who benefitted from BRV (investigator's opinion) could continue 0.5 mg/kg b.i.d (IV or oral solution) in an extension period. Outcomes included plasma concentrations of BRV following the first dose (primary), and incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). RESULTS: Six patients (median [range] postnatal age: 1.5 [1.0, 6.0] days) received ≥1 dose of BRV. All six patients completed the evaluation period; two entered and completed the extension period. Overall (evaluation and extension periods), three patients received one dose of 0.5 mg/kg BRV and three received more than one dose. The median (range) duration of exposure to BRV (IV and oral solution) was 1.5 (1.0, 29.0) days (n = 6). At 0.5-1, 2-4, and 8-12 h following IV BRV administration, the GeoMean (GeoCV) plasma concentrations of BRV were 0.53 mg/L (15.40% [n = 5]), 0.50 mg/L (28.20% [n = 6]), and 0.34 mg/L (13.20% [n = 5]), respectively. Individual and population BRV PK profiles were estimated, and individual PK parameters were calculated using Bayesian feedback. The observed concentrations were consistent with the predicted PK. Three patients experienced four TEAEs, none of which were considered related to BRV. SIGNIFICANCE: BRV plasma concentrations in neonates were consistent with data in older children receiving BRV oral solution, and with data from adults receiving a nominal IV dose of 25 mg b.i.d. BRV was well tolerated, with no drug-related TEAEs reported. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Few drugs are available to treat seizures in newborn babies. Brivaracetam is approved to treat focal-onset seizures in children and adults in Europe (patients 2 years of age and older) and the United States (patients 1 month of age or older). In this study, six newborns with repeated seizures were treated with intravenous brivaracetam. The study doctors took samples of blood from the newborns and measured the levels of brivaracetam. The concentrations of brivaracetam in the newborns' blood plasma were consistent with data from studies in older children and in adults. No brivaracetam-related medical problems were reported.

Anti-seizure medications for neonates with seizures.

BACKGROUND: Newborn infants are more prone to seizures than older children and adults. The neuronal injury caused by seizures in neonates often results in long-term neurodevelopmental sequelae. There are several options for anti-seizure medications (ASMs) in neonates. However, the ideal choice of first-, second- and third-line ASM is still unclear. Further, many other aspects of seizure management such as whether ASMs should be initiated for only-electrographic seizures and how long to continue the ASM once seizure control is achieved are elusive. OBJECTIVES: 1. To assess whether any ASM is more or less effective than an alternative ASM (both ASMs used as first-, second- or third-line treatment) in achieving seizure control and improving neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates with seizures. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 2. To assess maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy after achieving seizure control. We analysed EEG-confirmed seizures and clinically-diagnosed seizures separately. 3. To assess treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, Epistemonikos and three databases in May 2022 and June 2023. These searches were not limited other than by study design to trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that included neonates with EEG-confirmed or clinically diagnosed seizures and compared (1) any ASM versus an alternative ASM, (2) maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy, and (3) treatment of clinical or EEG seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors assessed trial eligibility, risk of bias and independently extracted data. We analysed treatment effects in individual trials and reported risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, and mean difference (MD) for continuous data, with respective 95% confidence interval (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence. MAIN RESULTS: We included 18 trials (1342 infants) in this review. Phenobarbital versus levetiracetam as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) Phenobarbital is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after first loading dose (RR 2.32, 95% CI 1.63 to 3.30; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), and after maximal loading dose (RR 2.83, 95% CI 1.78 to 4.50; 106 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). However, we are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital when compared to levetiracetam on mortality before discharge (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.04 to 2.52; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), requirement of mechanical ventilation (RR 1.21, 95% CI 0.76 to 1.91; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence), sedation/drowsiness (RR 1.74, 95% CI 0.68 to 4.44; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.76; 106 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Phenobarbital versus phenytoin as first-line ASM in EEG-confirmed neonatal seizures (one trial) We are uncertain about the effect of phenobarbital versus phenytoin on achieving seizure control after maximal loading dose of ASM (RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.54 to 1.72; 59 participants; very low-certainty evidence). The trial did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. Maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy in clinically diagnosed neonatal seizures (two trials) We are uncertain about the effect of short-term maintenance therapy with ASM versus no maintenance therapy during the hospital stay (but discontinued before discharge) on the risk of repeat seizures before hospital discharge (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.01; 373 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Maintenance therapy with ASM compared to no maintenance therapy may have little or no effect on mortality before discharge (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.39 to 1.22; 373 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.34 to 2.61; 111 participants; low-certainty evidence), neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.13 to 6.12; 108 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 3.18, 95% CI 0.69 to 14.72; 126 participants; low-certainty evidence). Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures versus treatment of clinical seizures alone in neonates (two trials) Treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation (MD -1871.16, 95% CI -4525.05 to 782.73; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence), mortality before discharge (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.28 to 1.27; 68 participants; low-certainty evidence) and epilepsy post-discharge (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.12 to 4.73; 35 participants; low-certainty evidence). The trials did not report on mortality or neurodevelopmental disability at 18 to 24 months. We report data from the most important comparisons here; readers are directed to Results and Summary of Findings tables for all comparisons. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Phenobarbital as a first-line ASM is probably more effective than levetiracetam in achieving seizure control after the first loading dose and after the maximal loading dose of ASM (moderate-certainty evidence). Phenobarbital + bumetanide may have little or no difference in achieving seizure control when compared to phenobarbital alone (low-certainty evidence). Limited data and very low-certainty evidence preclude us from drawing any reasonable conclusion on the effect of using one ASM versus another on other short- and long-term outcomes. In neonates who achieve seizure control after the first loading dose of phenobarbital, maintenance therapy compared to no maintenance ASM may have little or no effect on all-cause mortality before discharge, mortality by 18 to 24 months, neurodevelopmental disability by 18 to 24 months and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). In neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy, treatment of both clinical and electrographic seizures when compared to treating clinical seizures alone may have little or no effect on seizure burden during hospitalisation, all-cause mortality before discharge and epilepsy post-discharge (low-certainty evidence). All findings of this review apply only to term and late preterm neonates. We need well-designed RCTs for each of the three objectives of this review to improve the precision of the results. These RCTs should use EEG to diagnose seizures and should be adequately powered to assess long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes. We need separate RCTs evaluating the choice of ASM in preterm infants.

Treatment of seizures in the neonate: Guidelines and consensus-based recommendations-Special report from the ILAE Task Force on Neonatal Seizures.

Seizures are common in neonates, but there is substantial management variability. The Neonatal Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed evidence-based recommendations about antiseizure medication (ASM) management in neonates in accordance with ILAE standards. Six priority questions were formulated, a systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed, and results were reported following the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) 2020 standards. Bias was evaluated using the Cochrane tool and risk of Bias in non-randomised studies - of interventions (ROBINS-I), and quality of evidence was evaluated using grading of recommendations, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE). If insufficient evidence was available, then expert opinion was sought using Delphi consensus methodology. The strength of recommendations was defined according to the ILAE Clinical Practice Guidelines development tool. There were six main recommendations. First, phenobarbital should be the first-line ASM (evidence-based recommendation) regardless of etiology (expert agreement), unless channelopathy is likely the cause for seizures (e.g., due to family history), in which case phenytoin or carbamazepine should be used. Second, among neonates with seizures not responding to first-line ASM, phenytoin, levetiracetam, midazolam, or lidocaine may be used as a second-line ASM (expert agreement). In neonates with cardiac disorders, levetiracetam may be the preferred second-line ASM (expert agreement). Third, following cessation of acute provoked seizures without evidence for neonatal-onset epilepsy, ASMs should be discontinued before discharge home, regardless of magnetic resonance imaging or electroencephalographic findings (expert agreement). Fourth, therapeutic hypothermia may reduce seizure burden in neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (evidence-based recommendation). Fifth, treating neonatal seizures (including electrographic-only seizures) to achieve a lower seizure burden may be associated with improved outcome (expert agreement). Sixth, a trial of pyridoxine may be attempted in neonates presenting with clinical features of vitamin B6-dependent epilepsy and seizures unresponsive to second-line ASM (expert agreement). Additional considerations include a standardized pathway for the management of neonatal seizures in each neonatal unit and informing parents/guardians about the diagnosis of seizures and initial treatment options.

Whole-Body Hypothermia, Cerebral Magnetic Resonance Biomarkers, and Outcomes in Neonates With Moderate or Severe Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy Born at Tertiary Care Centers vs Other Facilities: A Nested Study Within a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The association between place of birth and hypothermic neuroprotection after hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy (HIE) in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is unknown. Objective: To ascertain the association between place of birth and the efficacy of whole-body hypothermia for protection against brain injury measured by magnetic resonance (MR) biomarkers among neonates born at a tertiary care center (inborn) or other facilities (outborn). Design, Setting, and Participants: This nested cohort study within a randomized clinical trial involved neonates at 7 tertiary neonatal intensive care units in India, Sri Lanka, and Bangladesh between August 15, 2015, and February 15, 2019. A total of 408 neonates born at or after 36 weeks' gestation with moderate or severe HIE were randomized to receive whole-body hypothermia (reduction of rectal temperatures to between 33.0 °C and 34.0 °C; hypothermia group) for 72 hours or no whole-body hypothermia (rectal temperatures maintained between 36.0 °C and 37.0 °C; control group) within 6 hours of birth, with follow-up until September 27, 2020. Exposure: 3T MR imaging, MR spectroscopy, and diffusion tensor imaging. Main Outcomes and Measures: Thalamic N-acetyl aspartate (NAA) mmol/kg wet weight, thalamic lactate to NAA peak area ratios, brain injury scores, and white matter fractional anisotropy at 1 to 2 weeks and death or moderate or severe disability at 18 to 22 months. Results: Among 408 neonates, the mean (SD) gestational age was 38.7 (1.3) weeks; 267 (65.4%) were male. A total of 123 neonates were inborn and 285 were outborn. Inborn neonates were smaller (mean [SD], 2.8 [0.5] kg vs 2.9 [0.4] kg; P = .02), more likely to have instrumental or cesarean deliveries (43.1% vs 24.7%; P = .01), and more likely to be intubated at birth (78.9% vs 29.1%; P = .001) than outborn neonates, although the rate of severe HIE was not different (23.6% vs 17.9%; P = .22). Magnetic resonance data from 267 neonates (80 inborn and 187 outborn) were analyzed. In the hypothermia vs control groups, the mean (SD) thalamic NAA levels were 8.04 (1.98) vs 8.31 (1.13) among inborn neonates (odds ratio [OR], -0.28; 95% CI, -1.62 to 1.07; P = .68) and 8.03 (1.89) vs 7.99 (1.72) among outborn neonates (OR, 0.05; 95% CI, -0.62 to 0.71; P = .89); the median (IQR) thalamic lactate to NAA peak area ratios were 0.13 (0.10-0.20) vs 0.12 (0.09-0.18) among inborn neonates (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.96-1.08; P = .59) and 0.14 (0.11-0.20) vs 0.14 (0.10-0.17) among outborn neonates (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.98-1.09; P = .18). There was no difference in brain injury scores or white matter fractional anisotropy between the hypothermia and control groups among inborn or outborn neonates. Whole-body hypothermia was not associated with reductions in death or disability, either among 123 inborn neonates (hypothermia vs control group: 34 neonates [58.6%] vs 34 [56.7%]; risk ratio, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.76-1.41), or 285 outborn neonates (hypothermia vs control group: 64 neonates [46.7%] vs 60 [43.2%]; risk ratio, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.83-1.41). Conclusions and Relevance: In this nested cohort study, whole-body hypothermia was not associated with reductions in brain injury after HIE among neonates in South Asia, irrespective of place of birth. These findings do not support the use of whole-body hypothermia for HIE among neonates in LMICs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02387385.

Application of the International League Against Epilepsy Neonatal Seizure Framework to an international panel of medical personnel.

OBJECTIVE: The International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Neonatal Seizure Framework was tested by medical personnel. METHODS: Attendees at the 2016 ILAE European Congress on Epileptology in Prague, the International Video-EEG Course in Pediatric Epilepsies in Madrid 2017, and a local meeting in Utrecht 2018, were introduced to the proposed ILAE neonatal classification system with teaching videos covering the seven types of clinical seizures in the proposed neonatal classification system. Five test digital video recordings of electroencephalography (EEG)-confirmed motor neonatal seizures were then shown and classified by the rater based on their knowledge of the proposed ILAE Neonatal Seizure Framework. A multi-rater Kappa statistic was used to assess the agreement between observers and the true diagnosis. RESULTS: The responses of 194 raters were obtained. There was no single predominant classification system that was currently used by the raters. Using the ILAE framework, 78%-93% of raters correctly identified the clinical seizure type for each neonate; the overall inter-rater agreement (Kappa statistic) was 0.67. The clonic motor seizure type was most frequently accurately identified (93% of the time; κ = 0.870). EEG technicians correctly identified all presented motor seizure types more frequently than any other group (accuracy = 0.9). SIGNIFICANCE: The ILAE Neonatal Seizure Framework was judged by most raters to be better than other systems for the classification of clinical seizures. Among all seizure types presented, clonic seizures appeared to be the easiest to accurately identify. Average accuracy across the five seizure types was 84.5%. These data suggest that the ILAE neonatal seizure classification may be used by all healthcare professionals to correctly identify the predominant clinical seizure type.

Parent-led massage and sleep EEG for term-born infants: A randomized controlled parallel-group study.

AIM: To examine the impact of parent-led massage on the sleep electroencephalogram (EEG) features of typically developing term-born infants at 4 months. METHOD: Infants recruited at birth were randomized to intervention (routine parent-led massage) and control groups. Infants had a daytime sleep EEG at 4 months and were assessed using the Griffiths Scales of Child Development, Third Edition at 4 and 18 months. Comparative analysis between groups and subgroup analysis between regularly massaged and never-massaged infants were performed. Groups were compared for sleep stage, sleep spindles, quantitative EEG (primary analysis), and Griffiths using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: In total, 179 out of 182 infants (intervention: 83 out of 84; control: 96 out of 98) had a normal sleep EEG. Median (interquartile range) sleep duration was 49.8 minutes (39.1-71.4) (n = 156). A complete first sleep cycle was seen in 67 out of 83 (81%) and 72 out of 96 (75%) in the intervention and control groups respectively. Groups did not differ in sleep stage durations, latencies to sleep and to rapid eye movement sleep. Sleep spindle spectral power was greater in the intervention group in main and subgroup analyses. The intervention group showed greater EEG magnitudes, and lower interhemispherical coherence on subgroup analyses. Griffiths assessments at 4 months (n = 179) and 18 months (n = 173) showed no group differences in the main and subgroup analyses. INTERPRETATION: Routine massage is associated with distinct functional brain changes at 4 months. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS: Routine massage of infants is associated with differences in sleep electroencephalogram biomarkers at 4 months. Massaged infants had higher sleep spindle spectral power, greater sleep EEG magnitudes, and lower interhemispherical coherence. No differences between groups were observed in total nap duration or first cycle macrostructure.

Routine and sleep EEG: Minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy.

This article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine ("standard") and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy-related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high-quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.

Routine and sleep EEG: Minimum recording standards of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology and the International League Against Epilepsy.

This article provides recommendations on the minimum standards for recording routine ("standard") and sleep electroencephalography (EEG). The joint working group of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology (IFCN) and the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) developed the standards according to the methodology suggested for epilepsy-related clinical practice guidelines by the Epilepsy Guidelines Working Group. We reviewed the published evidence using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement. The quality of evidence for sleep induction methods was assessed by the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) method. A tool for Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Studies (QUADAS-2) was used to assess the risk of bias in technical and methodological studies. Where high-quality published evidence was lacking, we used modified Delphi technique to reach expert consensus. The GRADE system was used to formulate the recommendations. The quality of evidence was low or moderate. We formulated 16 consensus-based recommendations for minimum standards for recording routine and sleep EEG. The recommendations comprise the following aspects: indications, technical standards, recording duration, sleep induction, and provocative methods.

Prednisolone or tetracosactide depot for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome? A prospective analysis of data embedded within two randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To report a prospectively planned analysis of two randomised controlled trials with embedded comparisons of prednisolone versus tetracosactide depot for the treatment of infantile epileptic spasms syndrome (IESS). METHODS: Individual patient data from patients randomly allocated to prednisolone or tetracosactide depot were analysed from two trials (UKISS, ICISS). The comparison was embedded within trials in which some patients also received vigabatrin but only patients receiving monotherapy with randomly allocated hormonal treatments are included in this analysis. The main outcome was cessation of spasms (Days 13-14 after randomisation). Lead time to treatment and underlying aetiology were taken into account. Cessation of spasms on Days 14-42 inclusive, electroclinical response (EEG Day 14), plus developmental and epilepsy outcomes (at 14 months in UKISS and 18 months in ICISS) are also reported. Minimum treatment was prednisolone 40 mg per day for two weeks or tetracosactide depot 0·5 mg IM on alternate days for two weeks, all followed by a reducing dose of prednisolone over two weeks. RESULTS: 126 infants were included in this study. On tetracosactide depot, 47 of 62 (76%) were free of spasms on Days 13-14 compared to 43 of 64 (67%) on prednisolone (difference 9%, 95% CI -7·2% to +25·2%, chi square 1·15, p = 0·28). For Day 14-42 cessation of spasms, on tetracosactide depot, 41 of 61 (67%) were free of spasms compared to 35 of 62 (56%) on prednisolone (difference 11%, 95% CI -6·4% to +28·4%, chi square 1·51, p = 0·22). There was no significant difference in mean VABS score between infants who received prednisolone compared with those who received tetracosactide depot (74·8 (SD 18·3) versus 78·0 (SD 20·2) t = -0·91 p = 0·36). The proportion with ongoing epilepsy at the time of developmental assessment was 20 of 61 (33%) in the tetracosactide group compared with 26 out of 63 (41%) in the prednisolone group (difference 8%, 95% CI -9·2% to +25·2%, Chi [2] 0·95, p = 0·33). SIGNIFICANCE: With hormone monotherapy, either prednisolone or tetracosactide depot may be recommended for infantile epileptic spasms syndrome.

Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part I: neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures.

The blooming of neonatal neurocritical care over the last decade reflects substantial advances in neuromonitoring and neuroprotection. The most commonly used brain monitoring tools in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) are amplitude integrated EEG (aEEG), full multichannel continuous EEG (cEEG), and near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). While some published guidelines address individual tools, there is no consensus on consistent, efficient, and beneficial use of these modalities in common NICU scenarios. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for best utilization of neuromonitoring modalities in neonates with encephalopathy or with possible seizures. Neuromonitoring approaches in extremely premature and critically ill neonates are discussed separately in the companion paper. IMPACT: Neuromonitoring techniques hold promise for improving neonatal care. For neonatal encephalopathy, aEEG can assist in screening for eligibility for therapeutic hypothermia, though should not be used to exclude otherwise eligible neonates. Continuous cEEG, aEEG and NIRS through rewarming can assist in prognostication. For neonates with possible seizures, cEEG is the gold standard for detection and diagnosis. If not available, aEEG as a screening tool is superior to clinical assessment alone. The use of seizure detection algorithms can help with timely seizures detection at the bedside.

Neuromonitoring in neonatal critical care part II: extremely premature infants and critically ill neonates.

Neonatal intensive care has expanded from cardiorespiratory care to a holistic approach emphasizing brain health. To best understand and monitor brain function and physiology in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU), the most commonly used tools are amplitude-integrated EEG, full multichannel continuous EEG, and near-infrared spectroscopy. Each of these modalities has unique characteristics and functions. While some of these tools have been the subject of expert consensus statements or guidelines, there is no overarching agreement on the optimal approach to neuromonitoring in the NICU. This work reviews current evidence to assist decision making for the best utilization of these neuromonitoring tools to promote neuroprotective care in extremely premature infants and in critically ill neonates. Neuromonitoring approaches in neonatal encephalopathy and neonates with possible seizures are discussed separately in the companion paper. IMPACT: For extremely premature infants, NIRS monitoring has a potential role in individualized brain-oriented care, and selective use of aEEG and cEEG can assist in seizure detection and prognostication. For critically ill neonates, NIRS can monitor cerebral perfusion, oxygen delivery, and extraction associated with disease processes as well as respiratory and hypodynamic management. Selective use of aEEG and cEEG is important in those with a high risk of seizures and brain injury. Continuous multimodal monitoring as well as monitoring of sleep, sleep-wake cycling, and autonomic nervous system have a promising role in neonatal neurocritical care.

Medical treatment in infants and young children with epilepsy: Off-label use of antiseizure medications. Survey Report of ILAE Task Force Medical Therapies in Children.

OBJECTIVE: Antiseizure medications (ASMs) remain the mainstay of epilepsy treatment. These ASMs have mainly been tested in trials in adults with epilepsy, which subsequently led to market authorization (MA). For treatment of - especially young - children with epilepsy, several ASMs do not have a MA and guidelines are lacking, subsequently leading to "off-label" use of ASMs. Even though "off-label" ASM prescriptions for children could lead to more adverse events, it can be clinically appropriate and rational if the benefits outweigh the risks. This could be the case if "on-label" ASM, in mono- or polytherapy, fails to achieve adequate seizure control. METHODS: The Medical Therapies Task Force of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE) Commission for Pediatrics performed a survey to study the current treatment practices in six classic, early life epilepsy scenarios. Our aim was not only to study first- and second-line treatment preferences but also to illustrate the use of "off-label" drugs in childhood epilepsies. RESULTS: Our results reveal that several ASMs (e.g. topiramate, oxcarbazepine, benzodiazepines) are prescribed "off-label" in distinct scenarios of young children with epilepsy. In addition, recent scientific guidelines were not always adopted by several survey respondents, suggesting a potential knowledge gap. SIGNIFICANCE: We report the relatively common use of "off-label" prescriptions that underlines the need for targeted and appropriately designed clinical trials, including younger patients, which will also result in the ability to generate evidence-based guidelines.