Distractibility predicts favourable response of functional tremor to transcranial magnetic stimulation: An electrophysiological study.

BACKGROUND: Generation of functional tremor relies on the structures involved in the control of voluntary movements. The clinical diagnosis is based on the presence of "positive signs", which are expression of cognitive and motor distractibility and reflect functional tremor dependence on explicit motor control. In patients who manifest less distractibility, habitual (implicit) control may be of greater significance. Habitual behaviours are inflexible and difficult to eradicate. OBJECTIVES: To investigate if motor and cognitive distractibility predicts response to treatment with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. METHODS: 21 patients with functional tremor underwent 5-day repeated sessions of continuous theta burst stimulation over primary motor cortex. A battery of tests to provoke positive signs was performed during accelerometry recordings and the total functional tremor accelerometry score was calculated for each patient. Response to treatment was measured as change in tremor amplitude, expressed as total power of the spectra between 1 and 30 Hz. RESULTS: On the group level, cTBS significantly changed postural tremor amplitude (Z = -1.9; p = 0.05), with the median decrease of 40%, IQR (-90-(+24)). There was a positive correlation between the functional tremor accelerometry score and reduction of postural tremor amplitude with treatment (rs = -0.75, p < 10-3). Responders had higher functional tremor accelerometry scores compared to non-responders (p = 0.001). The total functional tremor accelerometry score was a significant predictor of treatment response (OR = 2.8, p = 0.03; 95% CI 1.1; 7.2). CONCLUSIONS: Patients who are more distractible are better candidates for treatment with transcranial magnetic stimulation. The likely explanation is the between-subjects differences on the reliance of functional tremor generation on explicit vs. implicit motor network.

Lightning may pose a danger to patients receiving deep brain stimulation: case report.

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment option for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease and other movement disorders. It is known that DBS is susceptible to strong electromagnetic fields (EMFs) that can be generated by various electrical devices at work, home, and in medical environments. EMFs can interfere with the proper functioning of implantable pulse generators (IPGs). Very strong EMFs can generate induction currents in implanted electrodes and even damage the brain. Manufacturers of DBS devices have issued a list of warnings on how to avoid this danger.Strong EMFs can result from natural forces as well. The authors present the case of a 66-year-old woman who was being treated with a rechargeable DBS system for neck dystonia when her apartment was struck by lightning. Domestic electronic devices that were operating during the event were burned and destroyed. The woman's IPG switched off but remained undamaged, and she suffered no neurological consequences.