Prognostic value of revascularising viable myocardium in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction: a PET/CT study.

Sparse information is available on the role of cardiac viability imaging in elderly patients. We aimed at evaluating the prognostic value of FDG-PET/CT in elderly patients with stable coronary artery disease (CAD) and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (rLVEF) before revascularisation. Elderly patients (> 65 years old, mean 74 ± 7 years old) with CAD and rLVEF were followed after cardiac FDG-PET/CT and stratified according to presence/absence of viable myocardium and subsequent revascularisation. Fatal events of any cause as well as hospitalisations related to acute cardiac conditions were reported as clinical end-points. Predictors of fatal events in patients with viable myocardium (> 1 myocardium segment/20) were analysed. A total of 89 patients were followed (64 viable myocardia; 37 and 27 patients with and without subsequent revascularisation, respectively). The change in LVEF during follow-up (2.1 ± 1.6 years) was 3.8 ± 6.6% (P = 0.013) and - 0.75 ± 2.6% (P = 0.170) in patients with and without revascularisation, respectively. Log-rank (P = 0.037) and multivariate analysis (Wald: 6.305, P = 0.012) showed viable myocardium to be significantly associated with fatal events if not revascularised. Elderly patients with viable myocardium might potentially benefit from revascularisation procedures as improved left ventricular ejection fraction and survival were observed in our retrospective study as compared to patients in whom a revascularisation procedure was denied. Viable myocardium as detected by cardiac FDG PET/CT was associated with better clinical outcomes in elderly patients when revascularised.

Downstream indication to revascularization following hybrid cardiac PET/MRI: preliminary results.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid PET/MRI allows the acquisition of both fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (F-FDG) PET and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during one session. Whether this will result in different referral to coronary revascularization (CR) is unknown. We compared this new hybrid method with all-nuclear/all-CMR methods in the assessment of viable myocardium and in downstream referral to CR. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Overall, 12 patients with rest perfusion defects on a single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) were recruited for cardiac viability assessment using a PET/MRI device. Perfusion (SPECT and CMR), metabolism, late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), and contractility were compared using a 20-segments bull's eye for agreement. The patterns of ischemia/viability were compared between all-nuclear, all-CMR, and hybrid methods. Downstream CR was proposed after correlating findings to coronary angiography. RESULTS: The SPECT and CMR perfusion denoted poor agreement [agreement rate (AR): 60%; κ: 0.191, P<0.004]. The added PET metabolism concurred in reclassifying 19.2% of segments with intermediate or unassessable LGE using the hybrid method. Overall, the all-CMR method showed better agreement with the hybrid method than the all-nuclear method for findings of normal (AR: 100%, κ: 1.00 vs. 65.8% %; κ: 0.347, respectively; P<0.001), scar (AR: 85%; κ: 0.675 vs. 80.8%; κ: 0.596, respectively; P<0.001), and ischemic segments (AR: 95.8%; κ: 0.881 vs. 75.8%; κ: 0.168, respectively; P<0.001). Downstream CR was proposed in four, 11, and 12 vessels by the all-nuclear, all-CMR, or hybrid methods, respectively. CONCLUSION: Compared with all-CMR, the hybrid method allowed the reclassification of 19.2% segments. Using CMR perfusion instead of SPECT perfusion had a significant impact on downstream target vessel revascularization.