[Experience of olokizumab use in COVID-19 patients].

Most subjects with the COVID-19 experience mild to moderate symptoms, but approximately 10% of cases suffer from severe course of disease. IL-6 inhibitors are actively used to neutralize and prevent the cytokine storm. Olokizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody belonging to the G4/Kappa immunoglobulin isotype that selectively binds to human IL-6 and effectively neutralizes it. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of Artlegia (olokizumab) for the treatment of subjects with a disease caused by the SARS-COV-2 virus in a real-world clinical setting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The analysis included data of 610 subjects aged 55.0812.68 years who received olokizumab at a single dose of 160 mg/mL 0.4 mL subcutaneously as a preemptive anti-inflammatory therapy. The comparison group included 511 subjects aged 55.2311.23 years who received standard therapy without IL-6 inhibitors. Control Endpoints: 1. Positive clinical changes on Day 7. 2. Changes in the CRP levels on Days 1, 2, and 7. 3. Duration of oxygen therapy. 4. Number of days in hospital. 5. Number of adverse events. 6. Disease outcome. RESULTS: If a cytokine storm occurs, immune regulatory events will trigger the development of either a protective immune response or an exacerbated inflammatory response. The use of preemptive anti-inflammatory therapy has both a short-term and, most importantly, a long-term effect on the T and B parts of the immune process. These aspects definitely require further research and observation. CONCLUSION: The use of olokizumab to treat the new COVID-19 coronavirus disease has demonstrated a positive effect on clinical and laboratory parameters. Primarily, it affects the severity of clinical parameters by improving the general condition already on the first day of observation, and decreasing body temperature to normal values. The changes in the C-reactive protein levels show a significant effect of the IL-6 inhibitor on the systemic inflammatory response.

[Is medication possible for acute appendicitis?] / Vozmozhna li konservativnaia terapiia ostrogo appenditsita?

AIM: To study the possibility of antibacterial therapy for acute appendicitis as an alternative to surgical treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: For the period 1985-2010 diagnostic laparoscopy was performed in 5548 patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Acute phlegmonous or gangrenous appendicitis was observed in 2275 (41.0%) patients who underwent laparoscopic appendectomy. Other acute diseases occurred in 2458 (44.3%) patients. Acute catarrhal appendicitis or secondary inflammation of the appendix were diagnosed in 815 (14.7%) patients; they did not get appendectomy. In-hospital antibacterial therapy has been administered for 1-2 days followed by discharge for outpatient treatment. One patient with acute destructive appendicitis who refused surgery was treated with antibiotics. RESULTS: Antibacterial therapy in 815 patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis allowed to avoid surgical treatment. Complications (appendicular infiltration, abscess), repeated hospitalizations within 1 month were absent. Antibacterial treatment provided recovery in 1 patient with destructive appendicitis who refused surgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with acute catarrhal appendicitis diagnosed with laparoscopy do not need for appendectomy and can be cured by antibacterial therapy.

[Systemic Antimicrobials Consumption and Expenditures in Departments of Surgery of Multi-Profile Hospitals in the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus: Results of Multicentre Pharmacoepidemiological Study].

The results of the systemic antimicrobials (AM) consumption and expenditures assessment in the departments of surgery of multi-profile hospitals in different regions of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus in 2009-2010 based on retrospective collection and analysis of the data from the hospital expenditure notes using ATC/DDD methodology are presented. The average AM consumption and expenditure rates in the above mentioned departments varied from 24.9 DDD/100 bed-days to 61.7 DDD/100 bed-days depending on the department profile, with beta-lactams (cephalosporins and penicillins) share in the consumption being as high as 70-90%, followed by fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides. Only 55-70% of the consumed AM belonged to the drugs of choice, whereas the improper AM consumption and expenditure rates amounted up to 10-18%. The study outputs can be used for the budget allocation and AM distribution improvement in the departments of surgery, as well as for the development and efficacy control of the local antimicrobial stewardship programs.