Impact of Sarcopenic Obesity on Long-Term Cancer Outcomes and Postoperative Complications After Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of sarcopenia in gastric cancer (GC), although varying among the reported studies, is around 60%. In the last few years, it has been recognised that sarcopenia can also occur not only in patients with weight loss and low body weight, but also in patients with normal or increased body mass index. Therefore, the term sarcopenic obesity (SO) is a new definition that further expands the implications of altered body composition. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of SO on the perioperative morbidity and the survival of GC patients undergoing gastrectomy by evaluating body composition on CT images. METHODS: Preoperative CT scans were obtained from all patients with a diagnosis of GC undergoing gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2012 and December 2019. Skeletal muscle mass index (SMMI) and visceral adipose tissue (VAT) cross-sectional area at the level of the transverse processes of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) were measured. Sarcopenia and obesity were defined according to sex-specific cut-off points. RESULTS: After analysing 190 patients, the prevalence of SO was 21.1% (40 patients) and sarcopenia was 14.7% (28 patients). Multivariate analysis showed that corporal composition was an independent factor of overall survival (p = 0.049). Logistic regression was performed to identify risk factors associated with postoperative complications. SO was identified as a risk factor for serious Clavien-Dindo complications > IIIb/IV [OR 2.82 (1.1-7.1); p = 0.028]. CONCLUSION: SO was a risk factor for severe postoperative complications as well as worse long-term oncological after a gastrectomy for GC.

Dose-escalated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal or oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma.

Background: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CROSS-protocol is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an improvement in complete pathological response (ypCR) after a dose-escalation neoadjuvant protocol compared to standard treatment. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity. Material and methods: We prospectively evaluated patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The radiation dose was 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with weekly administration of six intravenous cycles of carboplatin AUC 2 mg/mL and intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 followed by surgery. Results: Between December 2015 and July 2020, 21 patients were treated according to the reported radiation schedules. Median age was 61 years (57-67). 20 (95.2%) tumors were located at the esophagogastric junction and 1 (4.8%) in the middle esophagus. Five (23.8%) were stage II and 16 (76.2%) stage III. Twelve (57.1%) patients received 41.4 Gy (standard group) and 9 (42.9%) received 50.4 Gy (intensification group), with 5 (41.67%) and 5 (55.6%) presenting ypCR in the standard and intensification group, respectively (p = 0.67). After a median follow-up of 17 months (8-30), DFS in the standard group was 17.78 months [95% (CI, confidence interval): 12.9-22.6] and 45.5 months (95% CI: 24.4-66.05) in the intensification group (p = 0.299). Grade III acute gastrointestinal toxicity was 16% and 33.33%, respectively (p = 0.552). Postoperative toxicity events ≥ Grade III were 5 (41.7%) and 4 (44.4%), respectively (p = 0.623). Conclusions: In our study we found a trend towards a higher complete pathological response-rate and disease-free survival in the intensification group compared to the standard group, with no differences in gastrointestinal toxicity. Well-designed randomized and controlled trials are needed to obtain conclusive data.

Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The oncological outcomes of laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) and open gastrectomy (OG) following neoadjuvant chemotherapy have been investigated in a few studies. Our purpose was to evaluate the oncological outcomes of LG and OG after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (GC) and to determine the advantages, preferences, and ease of use of the two techniques after chemotherapy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of all patients who underwent either OG (n = 43) or LG (n = 41). The neoadjuvant treatment regimen consisted of capecitabine plus oxaliplatin for three cycles, which was then repeated 6 to 12 weeks after the operation for four cycles. RESULTS: The hospital stay time and intraoperative blood loss in the LG group were significantly lower than those in the OG group. The mortality rate and the 3-year survival rate for patients in the LG group were comparable to those of patients in the OG group (4.6% vs. 9.7% and 68.3% vs. 58.1%, respectively). Similar trends were observed regarding the 3-year recurrence rate and metastasis. The mean survival time was 52.9 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 44.2-61.6) in the OG group compared with 43.3 (95% CI, 36.6-49.8) in the LG group. Likewise, the mean disease-free survival was 56.1 months (95% CI, 46.36-65.8) in the LG group compared with 50.9 months (95% CI, 44.6-57.2) in the OG group. CONCLUSION: LG is a feasible and safe alternative to OG for patients with locally advanced GC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Influence of positive margins on tumour recurrence and overall survival after gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Incidence of positive surgical margins after curative gastrectomy ranges from 1% to 20%. It has been suggested that positive surgical margin is an adverse prognosis factor, with a higher local recurrence and worse overall survival (OS). However, the management of these patients remains unclear. METHODS: A total of 267 patients who underwent gastrectomy with curative intent between January 2010 and December 2018 in our centre were enrolled in this study. Post-operative histological analysis revealed positive resection margins in 18 patients (8%). Clinicopathological features and outcome of patients undergoing gastrectomy with negative and positive margins were compared. RESULTS: Patients with positive margins were associated with higher American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage, T stage, N stage, median number of positive nodes, diffuse Lauren type, whole stomach involved and poorly differentiated tumours. Local recurrence was described in 50% of cases with positive margins. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that the TNM stage was the only independent prognostic factor associated with recurrence. OS for positive margins at 1, 3 and 5 years was 75%, 57% and 26%, respectively. The median survival in patients with positive margins was 38.33 versus 81.17 months for R0 patients (p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that age (hazard ratio [HR] 1.041, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.07, sex (HR 2.00, 95% CI 1.22-3.30) and TNM stage (p < 0.001) were independent factors of OS. CONCLUSION: Positive resection margin was an indication of advanced and more aggressive disease rather than an independent prognosis factor for OS or recurrence in gastric cancer.

Manejo de la fistula gástrica tras gastrectomía vertical / Management of Gastric Fistula After Sleeve Gastrectomy

No disponible

Influencia del COVID-19, el estado de alarma y el confinamiento en la epidemiología y gravedad de la apendicitis aguda / Influence of the COVID-19 state of alarm and lockdown on the epidemiology and severity of acute appendicitis

No disponible

Fertility and Pregnancy Outcomes in Women with Polycystic Ovary Syndrome Following Bariatric Surgery.

CONTEXT: Restoration of ovulation is quite common in women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) after surgically induced weight loss. Whether or not this results in an improvement of PCOS-associated infertility is uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To study fertility and gestational outcomes in women with PCOS after bariatric surgery. DESIGN: Unicenter cohort study. SETTING: Academic hospital. PATIENTS: Two hundred and sixteen premenopausal women were screened for PCOS before bariatric surgery. Women were followed-up after the intervention until mid-2019 regardless of having or not PCOS. INTERVENTIONS: All participants underwent bariatric surgery from 2005 to 2015. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pregnancy and live birth rates in the PCOS and control groups. RESULTS: In women seeking fertility, pregnancy rates were 95.2% in PCOS and 76.9% in controls (P = 0.096) and live birth rates were 81.0% and 69.2%, respectively (P = 0.403). The time to achieve the first pregnancy after surgery was 34 ±â€…28 months in women with PCOS and 32 ±â€…25 months in controls. Albeit the mean birth weight was lower (P = 0.040) in newborns from women with PCOS (2763 ±â€…618 g) compared with those from controls (3155 ±â€…586 g), the number of newborns with low birth weight was similar in both groups (3 in the PCOS group and 1 in the controls, P = 0.137). Maternal (17.6% in PCOS and 22.2% in controls, P = 0.843) and neonatal (23.5% in PCOS and 14.8% in controls, P = 0.466) complications were rare, showing no differences between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancy and fertility rates in very obese women with PCOS after bariatric surgery were high, with few maternal and neonatal complications.

Impact of interval timing to surgery on tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer

INTRODUCTION: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery is the optimal approach for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Interval timing to surgery after NACT in GC is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of NACT interval time on tumor response and overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective analysis from a prospective database was performed at a single referral tertiary hospital, from January 2010 to October 2018. Patients were assigned to three groups according to the surgical interval time after NACT: < 4 weeks, 4-6 weeks and > 6 weeks. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed in order to clarify the impact of NACT on post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response rate (ypCR), downstaging (DS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: of the 60 patients analyzed, 18 patients (30 %) had an interval time to surgery < 4 weeks, 26 (43.3 %) between 4-6 weeks and 16 (26.7 %) > 6 weeks. Two patients (3 %) had achieved ypCR and 37 patients (62 %) had achieved DS. There were no differences in DS rates among the interval time groups (p: 0.66). According to the multivariate analysis, only poorly differentiated carcinoma was significantly related to lower DS rates (p: 0.04). Cox regression analysis showed that the NACT interval time had no impact on OS. According to the multivariate analysis, > 25 lymph node harvested (HR: 0.35) and female sex (HR: 5.67) were OS independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: the NACT interval time prior gastrectomy for locally advanced GC is not associated with ypCR or DS and has no impact on overall survival

No disponible

Impact of interval timing to surgery on tumor response after neoadjuvant treatment for gastric cancer.

INTRODUCTION: neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by radical surgery is the optimal approach for locally advanced gastric cancer (GC). Interval timing to surgery after NACT in GC is controversial. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of NACT interval time on tumor response and overall survival. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a retrospective analysis from a prospective database was performed at a single referral tertiary hospital, from January 2010 to October 2018. Patients were assigned to three groups according to the surgical interval time after NACT: < 4 weeks, 4-6 weeks and > 6 weeks. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed in order to clarify the impact of NACT on post-neoadjuvant pathological complete response rate (ypCR), downstaging (DS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: of the 60 patients analyzed, 18 patients (30 %) had an interval time to surgery < 4 weeks, 26 (43.3 %) between 4-6 weeks and 16 (26.7 %) > 6 weeks. Two patients (3 %) had achieved ypCR and 37 patients (62 %) had achieved DS. There were no differences in DS rates among the interval time groups (p: 0.66). According to the multivariate analysis, only poorly differentiated carcinoma was significantly related to lower DS rates (p: 0.04). Cox regression analysis showed that the NACT interval time had no impact on OS. According to the multivariate analysis, > 25 lymph node harvested (HR: 0.35) and female sex (HR: 5.67) were OS independent predictors. CONCLUSIONS: the NACT interval time prior gastrectomy for locally advanced GC is not associated with ypCR or DS and has no impact on overall survival.

Assessment of short-term outcome with TiO2 mesh in laparoscopic repair of large paraesophageal hiatal hernias.

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic large para-oesophageal hiatal hernia (LPHH) repair using mesh reinforcement significantly reduces postoperative recurrence rates compared to conventional suture repair, especially within short follow-up times. However, the ideal strategy for repairing LPHH remains disputable because no clear guidelines are given regarding indications, mesh type, shape or position. The aim of this study was to survey our short-term results of LPHH management with a biosynthetic monofilament polypropylene mesh coated with titanium dioxide to enhance biocompatibility (TiO2Mesh™). METHODS: A retrospective study was performed at Ramon y Cajal University Hospital, Spain from December 2014 to October 2018. Data were collected on 27 consecutive patients with extensive hiatal hernia defects greater than 5 cm for which a laparoscopic repair was performed by primary suture and additional reinforcement with a TiO2Mesh™. Study outcomes were investigated, including clinical and radiological recurrences, dysphagia and mesh-related drawbacks. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients were included in our analysis; 10 patients were male, and 17 were female. The mean age was 73 years (range, 63-79 years). All operations were performed laparoscopically. The median postoperative hospital stay was 3 days. After a mean follow-up of 18 months (range, 8-29 months), only 3 patients developed clinical recurrence of reflux symptoms (11%), and 2 had radiological recurrences (7%). No mesh-related complications occurred. CONCLUSIONS: TiO2Mesh™ was found to be safe for laparoscopic repair of LPHH with a fairly low recurrence rate in this short-term study. Long-term studies conducted over a period of years with large sample sizes will be essential for confirming whether this mesh is suitable as a standard method of care with few drawbacks.

Acerca de los resultados a corto plazo de la gastrectomía casi total (95% gastrectomy) / Regarding to short-term results of laparoscopic near-total (95%) gastrectomy

No disponible

Outcomes of the Learning Curve in Our First 100 Consecutive Laparoscopic Gastrectomies.

INTRODUCTION: Laparoscopic surgery has been increasingly used for treatment of gastric cancer. However, standardization of this minimally invasive approach has not been reached yet because of its technical difficulties and the concern about oncological safety. The aim of the study was to analyze the outcomes of our learning curve in this complex surgical technique. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The first consecutive 100 cases of laparoscopic gastrectomy performed at our Hospital from November 2008 to February 2018 were enrolled. Patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of the period during which they were operated upon. The training phase was considered between 2008 and 2014 (46 cases) and the more developed phase (MDP) between 2015 and 2018 (54 cases). Conversion, lymphadenectomy and retrieved lymph nodes, hospital length of stay, mean operative time, complications, reintervention, and mortality rates were compared between the 2 phases of learning curve. RESULTS: The number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher in the MDP (17±8.6 vs. 23.3±10.4; P=0.004). Furthermore, we have also found less complications (47.8% vs. 27.8%; P=0.038), a decreased reintervention rate (15.2% vs. 1.85%; P=0.023), and overall mortality (8.7% vs. 0%; P=0.003) in the MDP. There were no significant differences in conversion rate, mean operative time, and hospital length of stay between phases. CONCLUSIONS: Although we consider that our learning curve is not yet completed, as the average of monitored parameters have not reached a steady state, the improvement on surgical parameters and postoperative course in the last 2 years have showed that our results are close to the best results published in the literature.

Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Gastrectomy for Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Analysis of a Textbook Outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Open gastrectomy (OG) has long been the preferred surgical approach worldwide for treatment of gastric cancer (GC). Nowadays, several randomized prospective trials have confirmed improvements in postoperative outcomes for laparoscopic gastrectomy (LG) compared with open procedures, with similar oncologic outcomes. However, many of these studies come from Eastern countries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A prospective nonrandomized study was conducted with all patients operated of GC at Ramón y Cajal University Hospital from January 2015 to December 2017. Of the 96 patients enrolled, 47 patients underwent LG and 49 OG. Textbook outcome was defined as the percentage of patients who underwent a complete tumor resection with at least 15 lymph nodes (LNs) in the resected specimen and an uneventful postoperative course, without hospital readmission. RESULTS: A textbook outcome was achieved in 51.04% of patients operated of GC. The outcome parameter "no severe postoperative complication" had the greatest negative impact on the textbook outcome. A statistically higher number of patients with early cancer (40% versus 16.3%) and subtotal gastrectomy (57.5% versus 34.7%) were found in the laparoscopic group. No statistical differences were found between open and laparoscopic approaches regarding operating time, rate of microscopic margin positivity, hospital stay, number of retrieved LNs, complications, reinterventions, mortality, and readmissions. No statistical differences in textbook outcome were found between both groups (57.14% versus 45%; P = .25). CONCLUSIONS: LG for treatment of GC seems to be safe and feasible with similar textbook outcomes compared with OG.

Redo Surgery after Failure of Antireflux Surgery.

Surgery for refractory gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has a satisfactory outcome for most patients; however, sometimes redo surgery is required. The Outcome and morbidity of a redo are suggested to be less successful than those of primary surgery. The aim of this study was to describe our experience, long-term results, and complications in redo surgery. From 2000 to 2016, 765 patients were operated on for GERD at our hospital. A retrospective analysis of 56 patients (7.3%) who underwent redo surgery was conducted. Large symptomatic recurrent hiatal hernia (50%) and dysphagia (28.6%) were the most frequent indications for redo. An open approach was chosen in 64.5 per cent of patients. Intraoperative and postoperative complication rates were 18 per cent and 14.3 per cent, respectively. Mortality rate was 1.8 per cent. Symptomatic outcome was successful in 71.4 per cent. Patients reoperated because of dysphagia and large recurrent hiatal hernia had a significantly higher failure rate (32.3% and 31.2%, respectively; P = 0.001). Complication rate was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group (0% vs 22.2%; P = 0.04). There were no statistical differences between expert and nonexpert surgeons. Laparoscopic approach has increased to 83.3 per cent in the last five years. Symptomatic outcome after redo surgery was less satisfactory than that after primary surgery. Complications were lower if a minimally invasive surgical approach was used.