Proline-Rich Chaperones Are Compared Computationally and Experimentally for Their Abilities to Facilitate Recombinant Butyrylcholinesterase Tetramerization in CHO Cells.

Human butyrylcholinesterase (BChE), predominantly tetramers with a residence time of days, offers the potential to scavenge organophosphorus pesticides and chemical warfare agents. Efficient assembly of human BChE into tetramers requires an association with proline-rich peptide chaperones. In this study, the incorporation of different proline-rich peptide chaperones into BChE is investigated computationally and experimentally. First, the authors applied molecular dynamic (MD) simulations to interpret the interactions between proline-rich chaperones with human BChE tetramer domains. The P24 chaperone which contains 24 prolines, promoted the association of BChE tetramer with a 74% simulated helicity of BChE subunits, whereas the control without chaperone and BChE with an 8-proline chaperone (P8) complex exhibited 55.8 and 60.6% predicted helicity, respectively. The interaction of proline-rich chaperones with BChE subunits (B-P) provides a conduit to facilitate the interactions between BChE subunits (B-B) of the complex, which is mainly attributed to hydrophobic interactions and hydrogen-bond binding. Experimental assessment of these two proline-rich chaperones plus a 14-proline chaperone (P14) was performed and confirmed that P24 has superior capability to facilitate recombinant BChE (rBChE) tetramerization with >60% rBChE tetramer in P24-transfected rBChE cells, whereas P14- and P8-transfected rBChE cells had 44 and 33% rBChE tetramer, respectively. The rBChE control had 14% tetramer. Finally, we developed a stable rBChE tetramer expression system in CHO cells by enriching P24 expression in rBChE expressing cells. Overall, our simulations provided a design concept for identifying proline-rich peptides that promote the rBChE tetramerization in CHO cells.

High-Throughput Lipidomic and Transcriptomic Analysis To Compare SP2/0, CHO, and HEK-293 Mammalian Cell Lines.

A combined lipidomics and transcriptomics analysis was performed on mouse myeloma SP2/0, Chinese hamster ovary (CHO), and human embryonic kidney (HEK) cells in order to compare widely used mammalian expression systems. Initial thin layer chromatography (TLC) analysis indicated that phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) were the major lipid components in all cell lines with lower amounts of sphingomyelin (SM) in SP2/0 compared to CHO and HEK, which was subsequently confirmed and expanded upon following mass spectrometry (MS) analysis. HEK contained 4-10-fold higher amounts of lyso phosphatidylethanolamine (LPE) and 2-4-fold higher amounts of lyso phosphatidylcholine (LPC) compared to SP2/0 and CHO cell lines. C18:1 followed by C16:1 were the main contributors to the difference in both LPE and LPC levels. Alternatively, the SP2/0 cell line exhibited 30-65-fold lower amounts of SM principally in the amount of 16:0. By mapping the transcriptomics data to KEGG pathways, we found expression levels of secretory phospholipase A2 (sPLA2), lysophospholipid acyltransferase (LPEAT), lysophosphatidylcholine acyltransferase (LPCAT), and lysophospholipase (LYPLA) can contribute to the differences in LPE and LPC. Sphingomyelin synthases (SMS) and sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase (SMase) enzymes may play roles in SM differences across the three cell lines. The results of this study provide insights that will aid the understanding of the physiological and secretory differences across recombinant protein production systems.

High-throughput screening and selection of mammalian cells for enhanced protein production.

The production of recombinant proteins for biotherapeutic use is a multibillion dollar industry, which has seen continual growth in recent years. In order to produce the best protein with minimal cost and time, selection methods are utilized during the cell line development process in order to select for the most desirable clonal cell line from a heterogeneous transfectant pool. Today, there is a vast array of potential selection methods available, which vary in cost, complexity and efficacy. This review aims to highlight cell line selection methods that exist for the isolation of high-producing clones, and also reviews techniques that can be used to predict, at a small scale, the performance of clones at large, industrially-relevant scales.