Predictors of complications in initially haemodynamically stable patients admitted in a modern coronary care unit.

AIMS: Resource optimization in the intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) is, nowadays, of great importance because of the increasing number of acute cardiovascular patients requiring high-intensity level-of-care. Because of natural limits in ICCU bed availability, understanding, which patients will really benefit from in a such a critical care setting, is of paramount importance. In our study, we analysed a heterogeneous ICCU population with initially stable haemodynamic conditions, in order to find potential predictors of severe complications. METHODS: Nine hundred and fifty patients admitted to our ICCU during the year 2019 were screened in order to detect those with a stable haemodynamic condition at admission. Data were extrapolated from an internal database. Comorbidity burden was expressed by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Our primary end point was defined by a combination of severe complications requiring critical care, and in-hospital death. RESULTS: Ninety-eight patients (14.1% of 695 stable patients identified) developed severe complications. After a multivariable logistic regression analysis, four predictors were identified: signs of congestive heart failure [OR: 9.25, 95% confidence interval (CI): 5.61-15.25; P < 0.001], SBP 120 mmHg or less (OR: 2.10, 95% CI: 1.27-3.47; P = 0.004), haemoglobin level 13 g/dl or less (OR: 1.75, 95% CI: 1.03-2.95; P = 0.037), and the CCI above 3 (OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.13-4.56; P = 0.022). CONCLUSION: In our study, 73% of patients showed a stable haemodynamic condition on admission. Severe complications occurred in 14.1% of these patients, and signs of heart failure were the main determinants of the outcome. SBP, haemoglobin level, and the CCI concurred in the prediction of severe complications during the hospital stay.

A handbook for the clinical cardiologist about CRT/ICD. A practical guide about how to survive during an on call shift.

Cardiac resynchronization therapies (CRTs) have been demonstrated to improve the clinical management and prognosis of selected patients with heart failure. CRT devices include both CRT pacemakers (CRT-P) and CRT defibrillators (CRT-D), with the latter being used to treat life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. A significant advantage of CRTs is the ability to monitor several vital parameters which, thanks to advanced technology, may be remotely assessed. Personalized programming options allow patients to receive the maximum benefit from these treatments. In this review we report the main diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms used in clinical practice.

[Cardiogenic shock: from early diagnosis to multiparameter monitoring]. / Shock cardiogeno: dalla diagnosi precoce al monitoraggio multiparametrico.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a life-threatening condition that occurs in response to reduced cardiac output, in the presence of adequate intravascular volume, and results in tissue hypoxia. CS can occur as a result of several etiologies but the most common is acute myocardial infarction. Despite the introduction of emergency revascularization for CS complicating acute myocardial infarction, mortality still remains exceptionally high, particularly in patients with refractory CS. The diagnosis of CS is sometimes challenging and it is based on clinical, hemodynamic, and biochemical signs. A multidisciplinary technical platform as well as specialized and experienced medical teams are crucial to treat this group of patients.We briefly summarize the main aspects of diagnosis, etiology and pathophysiology with a particular focus on macro- and microhemodynamic parameters that are essential for the diagnosis and treatment of this patient population.

[Cardiogenic shock: from pharmacological treatment to mechanical circulatory support]. / Shock cardiogeno: dal trattamento farmacologico all'assistenza meccanica al circolo.

Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a state of critical end-organ hypoperfusion due to reduced cardiac output, despite adequate filling status. The development of multiorgan dysfunction is believed to be the major contributor to the high early mortality. Little evidence exists as to which vasopressor or inotrope should best be used for early treatment; however, customized pharmacological therapy, tailored on hemodynamic monitoring, is essential to achieve normal peripheral perfusion. Moreover, an increasing number of mechanical circulatory support devices are available for hemodynamic support in patients with CS but, at present, data derived from randomized clinical trials on the effectiveness, safety, differential indications for mechanical support devices, and optimal implant timing are limited.The aim of this review is to offer an overview of the pharmacological and device options, providing a practical approach to the treatment of patients with CS.

[Noninvasive ventilation: general characteristics, indications, and review of the literature]. / Ventilazione non invasiva: caratteri generali, indicazioni e revisione della letteratura.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV), including both continuous and bilevel positive airway pressure, plays a pivotal role in the treatment of acute respiratory failure secondary to acute heart failure. For an appropriate use of NIV, it is essential to consider the underlying pathophysiological principles, the differences between the different modes of ventilation, the main indications, contraindications and complications. The aim of this review is also to give practical guidance on how and when to start NIV at the bedside, how to monitor the response and how to choose the most appropriate interface. A review of the literature supports the use of NIV in terms of efficacy (reduction in intubation and mortality) and safety (in particular, the risk of myocardial infarction associated with its use, suggested by a previous study, has been definitely confuted). Nevertheless, NIV is still largely underused in contemporary clinical practice, as reported by data from real-world registries. This may be due to several factors, including lack of knowledge/confidence, reluctance of application in particular settings (acute coronary syndromes) and the risk of adverse effects (hypotension), which need to be reappraised.

[Noninvasive ventilation and sedation: evidence and practical tools for its utilization]. / Ventilazione non invasiva e sedazione: evidenze a supporto e consigli pratici.

Noninvasive ventilation (NIV) has gained increased acceptance inside the critical area, since it has been shown to be effective in reducing or avoiding the need for oro-tracheal intubation. NIV efficacy is dependent on the selection of the appropriate patients and on their compliance to therapy. Actually, full collaboration is not easily reached especially in agitated patients.Sedation during NIV is useful to reduce the rate of treatment failure, but robust data to guide the development of best practice are limited and sometimes local customs appear to exert a strong influence on patterns of care. Different sedative drugs are ready for use but none of currently available agents fulfill the criteria for the ideal drug. Knowledge of the pharmacological and hemodynamic characteristics of every single sedative agent is crucial to choose the right drug for every clinical scenario. Close monitoring is mandatory to avoid adverse effects. The aim of this article is to review the currently available literature, to recognize the contraindications for sedation use and to provide practical guidance.

[Hemodynamic effects of positive end-expiratory pressure]. / Gli effetti emodinamici della pressione positiva di fine espirazione.

The application of a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP), the cornerstone of noninvasive ventilation (NIV), causes hemodynamic changes in the cardiovascular system. To understand the benefits of NIV it is necessary to resume concepts of cardiovascular physiology and pathophysiology about cardiac function determinants, venous return, ventricular interdependence and heart-lung interaction, and to understand how PEEP interacts with them. The hemodynamic effects of PEEP are mediated by the increase in transpulmonary pressure, which results in increased pulmonary vascular resistance and in an attending small reduction of venous return in conditions of euvolemia, in a substantial reduction of left ventricular afterload and a potential positive effect on left ventricular stroke volume.The aim of this review is to describe how the application of PEEP does not necessarily induce detrimental hemodynamic effects, but may decrease oxygen consumption and improve cardiac performance. These effects can justify the use of NIV in hemodynamically unstable patients.