Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum in men with and without urethritis syndrome: An underrecognized pathogen or a bona fide commensal?

BACKGROUND: By analysing the largest collection of Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum (C. glucuronolyticum) isolates from a single centre thus far, we aimed to appraise a potential causal link between an infrequently isolated species and the urethritis syndrome in men. METHODS: A total of 1055 Caucasian male individuals with or without urethritis syndrome were included in this single-centre case-control study. Group-wise comparisons were pursued by analysing sociodemographic, behavioural and microbiological specificities between the two groups. C. glucuronolyticum isolates from urethral specimens were identified using the analytical profile index biotyping system (API Coryne) and additionally confirmed by MALDI-TOF mass-spectrometry, with subsequent determination of their antimicrobial sensitivity profiles. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05 (two-tailed). RESULTS: C. glucuronolyticum was isolated in 5.08% of study participants with urethritis syndrome and 3.60% of those without it (p = 0.303). In the urethritis group, the species was more frequently found as a sole isolate (p = 0.041) and after prior infection with Chlamydia trachomatis (p = 0.025). The most frequent presentation of urethritis included a clear discharge in small or moderate amounts, without any pathognomonic findings. The resistance rates were 62.22% for clindamycin, 42.22% for tetracycline and 26.67% for ciprofloxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Our study provides major insights on the relevance of urethral C. glucuronolyticum in non-gonococcal urethritis, with significant implications for further aetiological research and management approaches.

The impact of Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum on semen parameters: a prospective pre-post-treatment study.

Corynebacterium glucuronolyticum (C. glucuronolyticum) is a rare isolate that is only recently being acknowledged as a potential urogenital pathogen. The bibliographical references on this bacterial species are scarce, and its influence on all semen parameters was hitherto unknown - therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate its effects on a range of sperm quality parameters. A prospective approach to compare semen parameters before and after treatment was used in this study. C. glucuronolyticum in semen specimens was identified using analytical profile index biotyping system (API Coryne) and additionally confirmed by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass-spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS), with the determination of antimicrobial susceptibility by Kirby-Bauer method. Semen analysis was performed according to the criteria from the World Health Organization (with the use of Tygerberg method of sperm morphology categorization). Very strict inclusion criteria for participants also included detailed medical history and urological evaluation. From a total of 2169 screened semen specimens, the inclusion rate for participants with C. glucuronolyticum that satisfied all the criteria was 1.01%. Antibiogram-guided treatment of the infection with ensuing microbiological clearance has shown that the resolution of the infection correlates with statistically significant improvement in the vitality of spermatozoa, but also with a lower number of neck and mid-piece defects. Parameters such as sperm count, motility and normal morphology were not affected. In addition, susceptibility testing revealed a trend towards ciprofloxacin resistance, which is something that should be considered when selecting an optimal treatment approach. Albeit it is rarely encountered as a monoisolate in significant quantities, C. glucuronolyticum may negatively influence certain sperm parameters; therefore, it has to be taken into account in the microbiological analysis of urogenital samples.

[The diabetic foot. The Croatian model--national consensus (clinical recommendations for diagnosis, prevention and therapy)]. / Dijabeticko stopalo. Hrvatski model--nacionalno usuglaseno misljenje (klinicke preporuke za dijagnostiku, prevenciju i lijecenje).

Diabetic foot occurs due to the loss of protective sense and circulation disorder and a marked proneness to infections. Mechanical stress of bone growths frequently leads to ulcerations. The prevention and timely treatment of diabetic foot requires the participation of both patients and all health care levels. This consensus is given for the purpose of procedure standardization. Education is the basis of prevention and should be carried out with every patient suffering from diabetes mellitus and those with a sensory defect in particular. Appropriate footwear significantly contributes to prevention and treatment of ulcers. As regards the treatment, the necessity of surgical approach with a long term and often manifold antibiotic therapy should be pointed out. Infections are usually mixed. The deeper the ulceration, the more likely the infection with anaerobes and Gram-negative bacteria occurs in addition to Gram-positive ones which are normally present in surface lesions. Strict metabolic control is a precondition for successful treatment. In conclusion, diabetic foot is a major health problem which requires multidisciplinary approach with permanent patient education as its essential part, and a specific cooperation of all levels and different health care specialties.