Impact of Renal Access Angle and Speed of Nephroscope Retrieval Movements on the Vortex Effect.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of different renal access angles (AAs) and nephroscope retrieval speeds on the efficacy of the vortex effect (VE) in mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL). This study aimed to understand the poorly understood physical components of the VE. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A Pexiglas™ (KUS®) model was built based on the dimensions of a 15/16 F mini-PCNL set (Karl Storz). The flow rate was continuous via an automatic pump and calibrated to achieve hydrodynamic equivalence to the real equipment. One experiment consisted of manually retrieving all 30 stone phantoms (3 mm diameter) utilizing only the VE. Cumulative time to retrieve all stones was measured. An accelerometer recorded instant speeds of the nephroscope every 0.08 seconds (s), and 3 experiments were performed at each angle (0°, 45°, and 90°). A logistic regression model was built utilizing maximum speeds and access angles to predict the effectiveness of the VE. RESULTS: Mean cumulative time for complete stone retrieval was 28.1 seconds at 0° vs 116.5 seconds at 45° vs 101.4 seconds at 90° (P < .01). We noted significantly higher speeds at 0° compared to 45° and 90° (P < .01); however, differences in average and maximum speed between 45° and 90° were not statistically significant (P = .21 and P = .25, respectively). The regression model demonstrated a negative association between increasing maximum speed and VE's effectiveness (OR 0.547, CI 95% 0.350-0.855, P < .01). When controlling for maximum speed, the 0° angle had significantly higher chances of achieving at least a partially effective VE. CONCLUSION: Increasing the renal access angle or nephroscope extraction speed negatively impacts the effectiveness of the VE. This significantly increased procedure time in the laboratory model, suggesting that the VE is less effective at higher sheath angles.

The Vortex Effect in Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the physical principles of the vortex effect to better understand its applicability in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MIP) procedures. METHODS: Two acrylic phantom models were built based on the cross-sectional area (CSA) ratio of a MIP nephroscope and access sheaths (15/16F and 21/22F MIP-M, Karl Storz). The nephroscope phantom was 10 mm in diameter. The access sheaths had diameters of 14 mm (CSA ratio: 0.69) and 20 mm (CSA ratio: 0.30). The models were adapted to generate hydrolysis, and hydrogen bubbles enhanced flow visualization on a green laser background. After calibration, the experimental flow rate was set to 12.0 mL/s. Three 30-second trials assessing the flow were performed with each model. Computational fluid dynamic simulations were completed to determine the speed and pressure profiles. RESULTS: In both models, as the incoming fluid from the nephroscope phantom attempted to move toward the collecting system, a stagnation point was demonstrated. No fluid entered the collecting system phantom. Utilizing the 14 mm sheath, we observed a random generation of several vortices and a pressure gradient (PG) of 114.4 N/m2 between the nephroscope's tip and stagnation point. In contrast, examining the 20 mm sheath revealed a significantly smaller PG (19.4 N/m2) and no noticeable vortices were noted. CONCLUSION: The speed of the fluid and equipment geometry regulate the PG and the vortices field, which are responsible for the production of the vortex effect. Considering the same flow rate, a higher ratio between the CSA of the nephroscope and access sheath results in improved efficacy of the vortex effect.