A Three-Arm Parallel-group Exploratory Trial documents balance improvement without much evidence of white matter integrity changes in people with multiple sclerosis following two months ambulatory neuroproprioceptive "facilitation and inhibition" physical therapy.

BACKGROUND: Changes of white matter integrity in people with multiple sclerosis (MS) were documented following mainly motor/skill acquisitions physical therapy, while following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (neurofacilitation) only by two pilot studies. Neurofacilitation has potential to induce white matter changes due to the possibility of interfering with the neuronal tactility threshold. However stronger evidence is missing. AIM: This study investigates whether neurofacilitation (three physical therapy types) induce white matter changes and if they relate to clinical improvement. DESIGN: The Three-Arm Parallel-group Exploratory Trial (NCT04355663). SETTING: Each group underwent different kinds of two months ambulatory therapy (Motor Program Activating Therapy, Vojta's reflex locomotion and Functional Electric Stimulation in Posturally Corrected Position). POPULATION: MS people with moderate disability. METHODS: At baseline and after the program, participants underwent magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and clinical assessment. Fractional anisotropy maps obtained from DTI were further analyzed using tract-based spatial statistic exploring the mean values in the whole statistic skeleton. Moreover, additional exploratory analysis in 48 regions of white matter was done. RESULTS: Ninety-two people were recruited. DTI data from 61 people were analyzed. The neurofacilitation (irrespective type of therapy) resulted in significant improvement on the Berg Balance Scale (P=0.0089), mainly driven by the Motor Program Activating Therapy. No statistically significant change in the whole statistic skeleton was observed (only a trend for decrement of fractional anisotropy after Vojta's reflex locomotion). Additional exploratory analysis confirmed significant decrement of fractional anisotropy in the right anterior corona radiata. CONCLUSIONS: Neurofacilitation improved balance without much evidence of white matter integrity changes in people with MS. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results point to the importance of neuroproprioceptive "facilitation and inhibition" physical therapy in the management of balance in people with multiple sclerosis; and the potential to induce white matter changes due to the possibility of interfering with the neuronal tactility threshold.

Brain activity changes following neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy in multiple sclerosis: a parallel group randomized comparison of two approaches.

BACKGROUND: Imaging methods bring new possibilities for describing the brain plasticity processes that underly the improvement of clinical function after physiotherapy in people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Although these processes have been described mainly in connection with task-oriented physiotherapy and aerobic training, they have not been properly verified in neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" (facilitation) approaches. AIM: The study determined whether facilitation physiotherapy could enhance brain plasticity, compared two facilitation methods and looked for any relation to clinical improvement in pwMS. DESIGN: The study was designed as parallel group randomized comparison of two kinds of physiotherapeutic interventions referred to healthy controls. SETTING: Thirty-eight outpatients were involved in the study. POPULATION: The study had 80 participants (38 pwMS and 42 healthy controls). METHODS: PwMS were divided into two groups and underwent a two-month physiotherapy program: Vojta reflex locomotion (VRL) or Motor program activating therapy (MPAT), (1 hour, twice a week). Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and clinical examination was performed before and after therapy. Healthy controls underwent one fMRI examination. RESULTS: Physiotherapy in pwMS leads to extension of brain activity in specific brain areas (cerebellum, supplementary motor areas and premotor areas) in connection with the improvement of the clinical status of individual patients after therapy (P=0.05). Greater changes (P=0.001) were registered after MPAT than after VRL. The extension of activation was a shift to the examined activation of healthy controls, whose activation was higher in the cerebellum and secondary visual area (P=0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive "facilitation, inhibition" physiotherapy may enhance brain activity and could involve processes connected with the processing of motion activation. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study showed that facilitation approach can modulate brain activity. This could be useful for developing of effective physiotherapeutic treatment in MS.

Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis: The relevance and importance of addressing quality of movement.

Impaired mobility is common in people with multiple sclerosis (MS). Changes in gait have different causes and require individualised gait rehabilitation. A common and often early cause of mobility impairment is footdrop, inability to lift the foot during the swing phase of gait, with increased risk of falls, effortful walking and fatigue. Using literature review, we have characterised published data on footdrop treatment in MS, specifically functional electrical stimulation (FES) to better understand the reported outcomes relevant to the user. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of FES and how far it meets the needs of people with footdrop. Physiotherapy combined with FES may further enhance the benefits of FES. MS studies emphasise the value of maintaining activity levels in early MS but discussion on how to achieve this is lacking. We emphasise the value of qualitative measures to broaden our understanding and improve treatment and adherence and identify areas for further research. Supplementary video material illustrates key features of MS gait and its correction using FES and physiotherapy.

Ambulatory Neuroproprioceptive Facilitation and Inhibition Physical Therapy Improves Clinical Outcomes in Multiple Sclerosis and Modulates Serum Level of Neuroactive Steroids: A Two-Arm Parallel-Group Exploratory Trial.

Background: Only few studies have monitored the potential of physical activity training and physical therapy to modulate the reaction of the endocrine system. In this study, the effect of neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition physical therapy on clinical outcomes and neuroactive steroids production in people with multiple sclerosis was evaluated. Moreover, we were interested in the factors that influence the treatment effect. METHODS: In total, 44 patients with multiple sclerosis were randomly divided into two groups. Each group underwent a different kind of two months ambulatory therapy (Motor program activating therapy and Vojta's reflex locomotion). During the following two months, participants were asked to continue the autotherapy. Primary (serum level of cortisol, cortisone, 7α-OH-DHEA, 7ß-OH-DHEA, 7-oxo-DHEA, DHEA) and secondary (balance, cognition and patient-reported outcomes) outcomes were examined three times (pre, post, and washout assessments). RESULTS: In both groups, there is a decreasing trend of 7-oxo-DHEA concentration in post-assessment and 7ß-OH-DHEA in washout versus pre-assessment. A higher impact on neuroactive steroids is visible after Vojta's reflex locomotion. As for clinical outcomes, the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test and Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale significantly improved between post-assessment and washout assessment. The improvement was similar for both treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition improved the clinical outcomes and led to non-significant changes in neuroactive steroids. Trial registration (NCT04379193).

Randomized comparison of functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position and motor program activating therapy: treating foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Functional electric stimulation (FES) is recommended for foot drop in multiple sclerosis, although little is known about its therapeutic effect. AIM: The aim of this study is to evaluate a therapeutic effect immediately and two months after program termination (persistent and delayed effect) of a new approach using FES in combination with correcting the patients' postural system. More specifically, we evaluate the effects of this approach on the patients' clinical functions and compared it with individual physiotherapy. DESIGN: Parallel randomized blind trial. SETTING: Two-month-long treatments, functional electric stimulation in posturally corrected position (group 1) and neuroproprioceptive facilitation and inhibition physiotherapy called motor program activating therapy (group 2). POPULATION: Forty-four subjects with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: Primary outcomes: gait (the 2-Minute Walk Test; Timed 25-Foot Walk test; Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12) and balance (by e.g. Berg Balance Scale [BBS], the Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale [ABC], Timed Up-and-Go Test [TUG]). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: mobility, cognition, fatigue and subjects' perceptions (e.g. Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale [MSIS], Euroqol-5 dimensions-5 levels [EQ-5D-5L]). RESULTS: Group 1 showed immediate therapeutic effect in BBS (P=0.008), ABC (P=0.04) and EQ-5D-5L (self-care, P=0.019, mobility P=0.005). The improvement in EQ-5D-5L persisted and in TUG-cognitive we documented a delayed effect (P=0.005). Group 2 showed an immediate improvement in BBS (P=0.025), MSIS (P=0.043) and several aspects of daily life (the effect on health today was significantly higher than in group 1, significant difference between groups P=0.038). CONCLUSIONS: FES in the posturally corrected position has an immediate therapeutic effect on balance and patients' perceptions comparable to motor program activating therapy, and higher persistent and even delayed therapeutic effect. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: The study results point to the importance of correcting the patients' posture when applying FES, the possibility to treat foot drop by individual physiotherapy and the activation of the patients' auto reparative processes.

Factors influencing balance improvement in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A pragmatic multicentric trial.

OBJECTIVES: Treatment for progressive multiple sclerosis (pMS) is a key area of research. To date, whether MS type and the rehabilitation setting are associated with worse or better response to rehabilitation is unclear. We aimed to understand the association between balance and MS type, in/outpatient treatment and specificity of the intervention. METHODS: We assessed 150 people with MS before and after in/outpatient rehabilitation. The Berg Balance Scale (BBS) was used to discriminate between responders (≥+3-point improvement in BBS score; a clinically meaningful improvement) and non-responders to specific or non-specific balance rehabilitation. Factors associated with balance were analyzed by univariate and multivariable logistic regression analyses, estimating odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Balance improved after rehabilitation: median (quartile 1 [Q1]-Q3) BBS score pre- and post-rehabilitation of 49 (45-53) and 52 (47-55) (P<0.001). Univariate logistic analysis revealed a clinically meaningful improvement in balance associated with pMS (OR 2.21 [95% CI 1.09-4.05]), inpatient therapy (0.41 [0.19-0.84]), using a walking aid (1.68 [1.06-2.69]), and low baseline BBS score (0.86 [0.81-0.92]). On multivariable analysis, probability of improvement was similar for participants with pMS and the relapsing-remitting form but was associated with low baseline BBS score and specific treatment (OR 0.81 [95% CI 0.74-0.89] and 5.66 [1.79-21.5]). CONCLUSION: A clinically meaningful improvement in balance was more likely when MS individuals with moderate to high disability had specific exercises targeting balance, but MS type did not influence the outcome.