Switch of Nocturnal Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation (NPPV) in Obstructive Sleep Apnea (OSA).

Background. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the first-line treatment for patients with OSA, but Bilevel-PAP (BiPAP) therapy is a recognized option for noncompliant/unresponsive patients to CPAP. The present study was designed to evaluate the role of ResMed VAuto in the management of two different issues raised because of the Philips recall: the treatment of naïve noncompliant/unresponsive patients to CPAP (Group A) and the switch to VAuto for patients already on treatment with Philips Auto-BiPAP (Group B). Methods. Sixty-four patients who required auto-BiPAP treatment from August to December 2021 were included in the study. The efficacy of each mode of PAP therapy was compared between the two groups of patients. Results. Group A showed a statistically significant improvement in the apnea−hypopnea index (AHI) (7.4 ± 8.5 events·h−1 vs. 15.2 ± 12.1 events·h−1, p < 0.001), and oxygen desaturation index (ODI) (9.4 ± 8.9 events·h−1 vs. 15.2 ± 8.8 events·h−1, p = 0.029) during VAuto in comparison to CPAP, respectively. Conversely, a similar trend was found for patients in Group B for global AHI, but a statistically significant reduction was just found in supine AHI and ODI. In group B, an AHI <5 events·h−1 was found in 89.3% during VAuto in comparison to 82.1% with Philips Auto-BiPAP (p = ns). The levels of IPAPmax and EPAPmin were not statistically different between the two devices (p = 0.69 and p = 0.36, respectively). Conclusion. Bilevel ventilation in VAuto mode is effective in the clinical management of two different issues derived from the Philips recall. The switching between two different auto-BiPAP devices can be performed easily and successfully.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: Reversal of pulmonary hypertension but not sleep disordered breathing following pulmonary endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: It has been hypothesized that pre-capillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) may trigger sleep disordered breathing (SDB). In patients with chronic thromboembolic PH (CTEPH), pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is potentially effective to improve PH. We assessed the pre- and post-operative prevalence of SDB in CTEPH patients submitted to PEA and the relationship between SDB and clinical, pulmonary and hemodynamic factors. METHODS: Unattended cardiorespiratory recording was performed the night before and one month after elective PEA in 50 patients. RESULTS: Before the intervention SDB prevalence (obstructive or central AHI ≥ 5/h) was 64%: 18 patients (66% female) had No-SDB, 22 (68% female) had dominant obstructive (dOSA), and 10 (20% female) had dominant central sleep apnea (dCSA). There were no differences in risk factors and the need for supplemental oxygen. Mean right atrial (mRAP) and pulmonary artery pressures (mPAP) showed a more compromised profile from No-SDB to dOSA and dCSA (mRAP: 5.5 ±â€¯3.9 vs 7.0 ±â€¯4.5 vs 9.7 ±â€¯4.3 mm Hg (p = 0.054), mPAP: 39 ±â€¯12 vs 48 ±â€¯11 vs 51 ±â€¯16 mm Hg (p = 0.0.47)). By contrast, cardiac index did not differ. At post-intervention, the prevalence of SDB was 68%: 16 patients had No-SDB, while 30 had dOSA and 4 dCSA, with no relationship with the relief from PH. Interestingly, 5 patients with previous CSA moved to the OSA group and 2 normalized. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of SDB is high in patients with CTEPH even after resolution of PH. Our data support the hypothesis that pre-capillary PH may trigger CSA but not OSA, and suggest that OSA may play a role in the development of CTEPH.

Can cardiorespiratory polygraphy replace portable polysomnography in the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing in heart failure patients?

PURPOSE: Portable polysomnography (PSG) and cardiorespiratory polygraphy are increasingly being used in the assessment of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) in heart failure patients. Scoring of SDB from cardiorespiratory polygraphy recordings is based only on respiratory signals, while electroencephalographic, electrooculographic and electromyographic channels are taken into account when using PSG recordings. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between these two scoring methods. METHODS: An overnight sleep study was performed in 67 heart failure patients using a standard portable polysomnograph. Each recording was scored twice, once using all acquired signals (PSG mode) and, after a median of 64 days, using only respiratory signals (cardiorespiratory mode). Agreement was assessed by Bland-Altman analysis and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS: We found that (1) more respiratory events were detected using cardiorespiratory analysis [median (25th percentile, 75th percentile), 75 (39, 200) events] compared to analysis of portable PSG [69 (29, 173) events, p < 0.0001], the extra events being, for the vast majority, central in origin; (2) the apnea/hypopnea index (AHI) estimated by cardiorespiratory polygraphy [11.9 (5.7, 30.8)/h] showed a negligible negative bias relative to portable PSG [15.1 (5.7, 33.6)/h; bias, -0.8 (-2.9, 0.4)/h, p = 0.0002]; (3) limits of agreement between the two systems (-6.2/h, 1.7/h) were much smaller than those previously observed between two nights using the same scoring modality; and (4) the kappa coefficient using categorised AHI was 0.89 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82, 0.96). CONCLUSIONS: We found a high degree of agreement between the AHIs obtained from the two scoring methods, thus suggesting that cardiorespiratory polygraphy may be used as an alternative to portable PSG in the assessment of SDB in heart failure patients.