Case Report: Atypical Solitary Brain Metastasis: The Role of MR Spectroscopy In Differential Diagnosis.

Background: Metastatic brain tumors are typically located at the cerebral hemispheres or the cerebellum and most frequently originate from primary breast or lung tumors. Metastatic lesions are usually associated with blood-brain barrier disruption, solid or ring-like contrast enhancement, and perilesional vasogenic edema on brain imaging. Even in cases where metastases are predominantly cystic, enhancement of the minor solid component can be detected. In contrast, non-enhancing secondary brain tumors were only reported in a patient after antiangiogenic treatment with bevacizumab. Case report: We report a case of a 54-year-old male who presented with left-sided weakness and multiple seizures. Brain magnetic resonance imaging revealed a T2-weighted heterogeneous solid tumor in the right frontoparietal parasagittal region, with no apparent enhancement on T1-weighted post-contrast images and no evident perilesional edema. Further MRS analysis revealed markedly increased choline and lipid peaks. The patient underwent craniotomy for tumor removal. Histopathology revealed findings consistent with metastatic non-microcellular neuroendocrine lung cancer. positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) revealed a stellate lesion within the right upper lung lobe, compatible with primary lung cancer. Conclusion: Non-enhancing brain metastatic tumors are rarely reported in the literature, usually following antiangiogenic treatment. Here, we report the first ever case of a non-enhancing metastatic brain tumor with no prior history of antiangiogenic treatment, with particular emphasis on the importance of MRS analysis in atypical brain lesions.

Ultra-Hypofractionated vs. Moderate Fractionated Whole Breast Three Dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Background and Objectives: Reducing time of treatment during COVID-19 outbreaks has been recommended by the leading Radiation Oncology societies. Still minimizing radiation induced tissue toxicity is one of the most important issues in breast cancer patients. The study aimed to investigate compliance, clinical and dosimetry normal tissue toxicity, and cosmetic results between moderated and ultra-fractionated regimes for breast cancer patients during COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods: This pilot prospective randomized study included 60 patients with early breast cancer after preserving surgery, 27 patients advocated to ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast three dimensional (3D) conformal radiotherapy of 26 Gy in 5 fractions over 1 week and 33 patients with moderate fractionated breast 3D conformal radiotherapy patients between March 2020 and July 2020, during the COVID pandemic outbreak. The compliance to treatment, dosimetric parameters, acute and late skin toxicity, subcutaneous tissue toxicity, cosmetic results and clinical follow up for 18 months for the two regimes were analyzed and compared. Results: When two regimes were compared 5 fraction group had significantly lower prevalence of newly infected cases of SARS-CoV-2 and thus delayed/interrupted treatment (p = 0.05), comparable grade 1 CTCAE v5, acute skin toxicity (p = 0.18), Grade 1 Radiation Morbidity Scoring Scheme (RESS) subcutaneous tissue toxicity (p = 0.18), Grade 1 RESS late skin toxicity (p = 0.88) and cosmetic results (p = 0.46). Dosimetric results reveled that patients in 5 fraction group received significantly lower median ipsilateral lung doses (p < 0.01) in addition to left breast cancer patients that received significantly lower median heart dose (p < 0.01) and median left anterior descending artery (LAD) dose (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy for breast cancer is comparable to moderate hypofractionation regimen regarding grade 1 acute skin toxicity, grade 1 subcutaneous tissue toxicity, late skin toxicity and cosmetic results. Application of ultra-hypofractionated radiotherapy with significantly lower radiation doses for lung and heart could be crucial in reducing the risk of acute/late pulmonary and heart radiation-induced toxicity.

Is Elevated Choline on Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy a Reliable Marker of Breast Lesion Malignancy?

BACKGROUND: Contemporary magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the breast represents a powerful diagnostic modality for cancer detection, with excellent sensitivity and high specificity. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is being explored as an additional tool for improving specificity in breast cancer detection, using multiparametric MRI. The aim of this study was to examine the possibility of 1H-MRS to discriminate malignant from benign breast lesions, using elevated choline (Cho) peak as an imaging biomarker. METHODS: A total of 60 patients were included in this prospective study: 30 with malignant (average age, 55.2 years; average lesion size, 35 mm) and 30 with benign breast lesions (average age, 44.8 years; average lesion size, 20 mm), who underwent multiparametric MRI with multivoxel 3D 1H-MRS on a 1.5-T scanner in a 3-year period. Three patients with benign breast lesions were excluded from the study. All lesions were histologically verified. Peaks identified on 1H-MRS were lipid (0.9, 2.3, 2.8, and 5.2 ppm), choline (3.2 ppm), and water peaks (4.7 ppm). Sensitivity and specificity, as well as positive and negative predictive values, were defined using ROC curves. Cohen's Kappa test of inter-test reliability was performed [testing the agreement between 1H-MRS and histologic finding, and 1H-MRS and MR mammography (MRM)]. RESULTS: Choline peak was elevated in 24/30 malignant lesions and in 20/27 benign breast lesions. The sensitivity of 1H-MRS was 0.8, specificity was 0.741, positive predictive value was 0.774, and negative predictive value was 0.769. Area under ROC was 0.77 (CI 0.640-0.871). Inter-test reliability between 1H-MRS and histologic finding was 0.543 (moderate agreement) and that between 1H-MRS and MRM was 0.573 (moderate agreement). False-negative findings were most frequently observed in invasive lobular cancers, while false-positive findings were most frequently observed in adenoid fibroadenomas. CONCLUSION: Although elevation of the choline peak has a good sensitivity and specificity in breast cancer detection, both are significantly lower than those of multiparametric MRM. Inclusion of spectra located on tumor margins as well as analysis of lipid peaks could aid both sensitivity and specificity. An important ratio of false-positive and false-negative findings in specific types of breast lesions (lobular cancer and adenoid fibroadenoma) suggests interpreting these lesions with a caveat.

Hepatocellular carcinoma and impact of aflatoxin difuranocoumarin derivative system ­ A case report.

Introduction: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent type of liver malignancy. As a carcinogen, aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) causes HCC by inducing deoxyribonucleic acid adducts that lead to genetic changes in liver cells and may be the cause of HCC in up to 30% of cases. The incidence of HCC has been on the rise and is an issue in the countries of the Western Balkans. Case Outline: This paper presents a case of a 37-year-old woman who was diagnosed with HCC, without hepatitis B, hepatitis C, or liver cirrhosis. The patient consumed milk and dairy products in quantities of over two liters per day over the course of 20 years, which indicates the impact of aflatoxin in milk on HCC. A positive signal for the presence of AFB1 was detected by ELISA (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) in-house using immunoperoxidase screening test. Conclusion: As carcinogenic difuranocoumarin derivative, aflatoxin B1 is the most likely cause of malignant transformation of hepatocytes, which resulted in hepatocellular carcinoma in this patient.