A comparative study of one implant versus two replacing a single molar.

A comparative study between one and two Brånemark implants replacing a single molar was conducted. Forty-seven individuals comprised two groups of 22 patients treated with one implant and 25 with two implants. A total of 72 implants were placed, 66 (92%) in the mandible and six (8%) in the maxilla. After the first year of function, the success rate was 99%, with only one implant lost. Between the second- and third-year follow-ups, 100% of the implants continued to function in the remaining 46 patients, giving a 3-year cumulative success rate of 99%. The marginal bone loss between 1 and 3 years of function was 0.10 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with one implant and 0.24 mm (SD 0.20) for the group with two implants. No changes were observed in the Sulcus Bleeding Index during the 3-year follow-up. Prosthesis mobility or screw loosening was the most frequent complication and was predominant in the group using one implant (48%), but was substantially reduced in the group using two implants (8%). These mechanical problems, using one implant only, seem to be preventable using a stronger screw joint (CeraOne abutment). Precise centric occlusal contact was established and maintained over the study period, which was thought to contribute to the very high success rate for the single-implant-supported molars, despite their high degree of mechanical problems. This study suggests that implant-supported molars can be effective therapy, and the results confirm the biomechanical analysis that two implants provide more advantageous support than does one.

Changes in jugular venous flow velocity after coronary artery bypass grafting.

The factors underlying postoperative jugular venous flow velocity and pulse contour changes were studied in 25 patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting. Before operation, all patients had normal right-sided cardiac hemodynamics, normal jugular pulse contours and normal jugular venous flow velocity patterns, i.e., systolic flow (SF) velocity greater than diastolic flow (DF) velocity. After operation, jugular venous flow velocity was abnormal in 24 patients (SF = DF in 14 and SF less than DF in 10). Neither the right-sided cardiac pressures after the operation nor any of the perioperative factors examined had any bearing on these flow alterations. Postoperative right ventricular ejection fraction was normal in all 5 patients with SF greater than DF and SF = DF flow patterns (mean +/- standard error of the mean 48 +/- 3%). It was significantly depressed in all 6 patients with SF less than DF flow pattern (34 +/- 1%, 2p less than 0.001). These findings suggest that the right atrium behaves as a conduit rather than a capacitance chamber. However, the postoperative abnormal flow pattern of SF less than DF as opposed to SF = DF indicates the additional presence of right ventricular dysfunction. The implications of these observations for the clinical assessment of right ventricular function in the postoperative patients are discussed.