Effects of Thiopurine Withdrawal on Vedolizumab-Treated Patients With Ulcerative Colitis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: The impact of thiopurine de-escalation while on vedolizumab versus continuing thiopurine therapy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is unclear. We aimed to determine the effect of thiopurine withdrawal for patients with UC in remission on vedolizumab. METHODS: This multicenter randomized controlled trial recruited UC patients on vedolizumab 300 mg intravenously every 8 weeks and a thiopurine. Patients in steroid-free clinical remission for ≥6 months and endoscopic remission/improvement (Mayo endoscopic subscore ≤1) were randomized 2:1 to withdraw or continue thiopurine. Primary outcome was comparing week 48 vedolizumab trough concentrations. Secondary outcomes were clinical relapse (partial Mayo score ≥3 and fecal calprotectin >150 µg/g or increase in Mayo endoscopic subscore ≥1 from baseline), fecal calprotectin remission (<150 µg/g), C-reactive protein remission (<5 mg/L), centrally read endoscopic remission (Mayo endoscopic subscore = 0), histologic remission (Nancy index = 0), histo-endoscopic remission, and adverse events. RESULTS: In total, 62 patients were randomized to continue (n = 20) or withdraw (n = 42) thiopurine. At week 48, vedolizumab trough concentrations were not significantly different between continue and withdrawal groups (14.7 µg/mL, interquartile rate [IQR], 12.3-18.5 µg/mL versus 15.9 µg/mL, IQR, 10.1-22.7 µg/mL, respectively, P = 0.36). The continue group had significantly higher fecal calprotectin remission (95.0%, 19/20 versus 71.4%, 30/42; P = .03), histologic remission (80.0%, 16/20 versus 48.6%, 18/37; P = .02), and histo-endoscopic remission (75.0%, 15/20 versus 32.4%, 12/37; P = .002) than the withdrawal group. Histologic activity (hazard ratio [HR], 15.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-146.5; P = .02) and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure (HR, 6.5; 95% CI, 1.3-33.8; P = .03) predicted clinical relapse after thiopurine withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Thiopurine withdrawal did not affect vedolizumab trough concentrations. However, it may increase fecal calprotectin, histologic, and histo-endoscopic activity. Histologic activity and prior anti-tumor necrosis factor exposure may predict disease relapse on thiopurine withdrawal for patients using vedolizumab for UC. Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry, number ACTRN12618000812291.

Meta-analysis: Persistence of advanced therapies in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: The expanding options in advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) present challenges in treatment selection. Persistence analysis assesses drug durability in real-world settings, acting as a surrogate marker for medication efficacy and tolerance. Unlike traditional comparative studies, persistence analysis provides insights extending beyond the initial year of treatment. AIM: To provide real-world evidence on treatment effectiveness, tolerability and preferences of physicians and patients regarding various advanced therapies for IBD. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of observational studies up to March 2023 assessing advanced therapies' persistence in UC and CD. Advanced therapies under examination included infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, golimumab, certolizumab and tofacitinib. We pooled the persistence of each agent and conducted a meta-analysis to compare the persistence of newer agents with traditional TNF inhibitors (TNFi)-specifically infliximab and adalimumab. RESULTS: Among 63 observational studies, vedolizumab had the highest 1-year persistence in UC (73.8%, 95% CI: 70.0%-77.6%) and ustekinumab in CD (77.5%, 95% CI: 72.9%-82.1%). Compared to TNFi, vedolizumab demonstrated increased persistence with a relative risk (RR) of 1.30 (95% CI: 1.19-1.41) for UC and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.09-1.20) for CD at 1 year, while ustekinumab demonstrated a RR of 1.15 (95% CI: 1.07-1.23) for CD at 1 year. Vedolizumab exhibited sustained increased persistence in UC over 2 years compared to TNFi (RR: 1.33, 95% CI 1.14-1.54). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis highlights the superior persistence of ustekinumab and vedolizumab over TNFi, and offers valuable insights for clinicians navigating the challenging landscape of UC and CD therapeutic choices.

Biological Agents in the Treatment of Crohn's Disease: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis From the Prospective Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC3) Study.

INTRODUCTION: Comparative effectiveness research provides data on the relative benefits and risks between treatments. In Crohn's disease (CD), however, there are few head-to-head studies comparing advanced therapies and none with long-term follow-up. Real-world effectiveness, defined by treatment persistence, obtained from prospective population-based patient cohorts, may help determine the best sequencing and positioning of biological agents. METHODS: We analyzed the prospectively collected population-based Australian national Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme dispensing data registry (2005-2019) for CD. There is no mandated biological agent prescribing order, and all citizens and permanent residents are eligible for treatment irrespective of insurance status. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce selection bias. RESULTS: There were 2,029 lines of therapy in 1,446 patients (median age 43 years, interquartile range 34-58, 44% male patients) over the 15-year period with 5,618 patient-years of follow-up. Per line of therapy, 915/2,029 (45.1%) patients used adalimumab, 722/2,029 (35.6%) used infliximab, 155/2,029 (7.6%) used vedolizumab, and 237/2,029 (11.7%) used ustekinumab. When used in biological agent-naive patients, there was no difference in persistence between any agent ( P > 0.05). Used after first line in biological agent-experienced CD, ustekinumab had significantly better persistence than non-ustekinumab biological agents ( P = 0.0018), vs anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) alpha therapy ( P = 0.006) or vedolizumab ( P < 0.001). Ustekinumab persistence was unaffected by prior biological agent exposure ( P = 0.51). After anti-TNF use, ustekinumab had superior persistence to an alternative anti-TNF agent ( P = 0.033) and to vedolizumab ( P = 0.026). Using a propensity score-matched analysis adjusted for age, immunomodulator use, and bio-exposed status, ustekinumab had superior persistence to anti-TNF ( P = 0.01). Multivariate predictors of worse persistence were the use of a non-ustekinumab biological agent (adjusted hazard ratio 2.10, P < 0.001), and bio-experienced status (adjusted hazard ratio 1.23, P < 0.001). DISCUSSION: This large national prospective database with nonhierarchical prescribing of biological agents did not identify superior persistence of any agent in bio-naive CD. However, for patients with bio-experienced CD, persistence was greater with ustekinumab.

Comparing persistence of new biologics to conventional anti-TNF alphas in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol.

BACKGROUND: Biological therapy is a cornerstone of managing moderate-to-severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). New biologics have been evolving over the past 20 years and selection of an agent remains challenging.Drug persistence measures the duration of time from initiation to discontinuation of a therapy, which can be a surrogate marker of drug tolerance and efficacy. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to compare drug persistence of new generation biologics for the treatment of UC and CD (vedolizumab, ustekinumab, certolizumab, tofacitinib, natalizumab and golimumab) with conventional anti-tumor necroisis factor alphas (anti-TNF alphas) (adalimumab and infliximab) in adult patients with IBD. Results of the study may provide guidance on the preferred first and subsequent lines of biological treatments in patients with IBD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Search via electronic databases including EMBASE, MEDLINE, PubMed and clinical trial databases will be conducted on 10 March 2023 with eligible studies included from inception of 2017 to 2023. The primary outcomes are 1-year persistence of individual biologics with comparison of new biologics versus conventional anti-TNF alphas. A meta-analysis will be conducted using Review Manager V.5 and outcome will be presented as relative risk. Heterogeneity will be assessed with forest plot, χ2 and I2, followed with sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis. Finally, the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system will be used to assess the quality of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval is not required as no private information of participants will be used. Results of the present study will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal or conference presentation. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023392236.

Knowledge and attitudes towards the use of histological assessments in ulcerative colitis by gastroenterologists vs pathologists.

BACKGROUND: Histological remission is increasingly accepted as a treatment endpoint in the management of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the knowledge of histology guidelines and the attitudes towards their use in clinical practice by gastroenterologists and pathologists is unknown. AIM: To evaluate the knowledge of histology guidelines and attitudes towards the use of histology in UC by gastroenterologists and pathologists. METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional nationwide survey of gastroenterologists and pathologists who analyse UC specimens was conducted. The survey consisted of 34 questions to assess gastroenterologists' and pathologists' knowledge (score out of 19) and attitudes towards histological assessment in UC. Survey questions were formulated using the European Crohn's and Colitis position paper on histopathology and the British Society of Gastroenterology biopsy reporting guidelines. It included knowledge of histological assessment of disease activity and dysplasia, knowledge of histological scoring systems for ulcerative colitis, uptake of histology scoring systems in routine practice, attitudes towards the role of histological activity, and the use of histological activity in clinical scenarios. RESULTS: Of 89 responders (77 gastroenterologists, 12 pathologists), there was almost universal acceptance that histological assessment should form part of UC evaluation [95% gastroenterologists, 92% pathologists]. However, gastroenterologists reported that 92% of their pathologists do not use a histological scoring system. Utilisation of a formal histological scoring system was preferred by 77% of gastroenterologists and 58% of pathologists. Both groups lacked awareness of the Geboes Score, Nancy Index and Robarts Histopathological Index scoring systems with 91%, 87%, and 92% of gastroenterologists respectively; and 83%, 83%, and 92% pathologists respectively, being uncertain of scoring systems' remission definitions. Histology knowledge score was not significantly different between gastroenterologists and pathologists [9/19 (IQR: 8-11) vs 8/19 (IQR: 7-10), P = 0.54]. Higher knowledge scores were predicted by hospital attending gastroenterologists (P = 0.004), participation in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) multidisciplinary teams (P = 0.009), and self-declared IBD sub-specialist (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Histological remission is a recognised target for both gastroenterologists and pathologists. Despite this, knowledge of histological scoring systems and their utilisation is poor.

Tryptophan Metabolism 'Hub' Gene Expression Associates with Increased Inflammation and Severe Disease Outcomes in COVID-19 Infection and Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

The epithelial barrier's primary role is to protect against entry of foreign and pathogenic elements. Both COVID-19 and Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) show commonalities in symptoms and treatment with sensitization of the epithelial barrier inviting an immune response. In this study we use a multi-omics strategy to identify a common signature of immune disease that may be able to predict for more severe patient outcomes. Global proteomic approaches were applied to transcriptome and proteome. Further semi- and relative- quantitative targeted mass spectrometry methods were developed to substantiate the proteomic and metabolomics changes in nasal swabs from healthy, COVID-19 (24 h and 3 weeks post infection); serums from Crohn's disease patients (scored for epithelial leak), terminal ileum tissue biopsies (patient matched inflamed and non-inflamed regions, and controls). We found that the tryptophan/kynurenine metabolism pathway is a 'hub' regulator of canonical and non-canonical transcription, macrophage release of cytokines and significant changes in the immune and metabolic status with increasing severity and disease course. Significantly modified pathways include stress response regulator EIF2 signaling (p = 1 × 10-3); energy metabolism, KYNU (p = 4 × 10-4), WARS (p = 1 × 10-7); inflammation, and IDO activity (p = 1 × 10-6). Heightened levels of PARP1, WARS and KYNU are predictive at the acute stage of infection for resilience, while in contrast, levels remained high and are predictive of persistent and more severe outcomes in COVID disease. Generation of a targeted marker profile showed these changes in immune disease underlay resolution of epithelial barrier function and have the potential to define disease trajectory and more severe patient outcomes.

Vedolizumab has longer persistence than infliximab as a first-line biological agent but not as a second-line biological agent in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis: real-world registry data from the Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC) study.

Background: The choice between infliximab (IFX) and vedolizumab (VED) as a first-line biological agent in moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC) can be difficult. Second-line vedolizumab (VED) efficacy may decline following prior infliximab (IFX) treatment failure in UC patients. However, it is not known whether second-line IFX efficacy declines after failure of first-line VED. Aims: We aimed to compare first-line and second-line persistence of IFX and VED, in particular whether second-line IFX persistence declines after failure of first-line VED. Methods: Persistence of IFX and VED was analysed from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme registry data as either first- or second-line treatment in UC. Propensity score matching (1:1) was conducted in the comparison of first-line treatments. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify significant predictors and expressed as a hazard ratio (HR and 95% CI). Results: There were 420 subjects with moderate-to-severe UC who received either first-line IFX (n = 251) or VED (n = 169), with 774 patient-years of follow-up. First-line VED had significantly longer persistence than first-line IFX (>50.2 versus 22.2 months, p = 0.001). Fifty-three subjects failed first-line IFX and swapped to second-line VED (IFX→VED group). Twenty-two subjects failed first-line VED group and swapped to second-line IFX (VED→IFX group). First-line VED persistence was significantly longer than second-line VED (>50.2 versus 32.0 months, p = 0.03), but first-line IFX persistence was not statistically significantly different to second-line IFX (27.6 months versus > 38.6 months, p = 0.30). Immunomodulator co-therapy was significantly associated with a lower risk of nonpersistence of first-line VED (HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.33-0.89, p = 0.02) and IFX (HR: 0.63,95%CI: 0.33-0.92, p = 0.02). Conclusion: VED had a significantly longer persistence than IFX as first-line biological agent but does not disadvantage second-line IFX use in moderate-to-severe UC. VED after IFX is associated with significantly poorer persistence. VED, therefore, should be considered as the first-line biological agent of choice in UC.

High prevalence of Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis among older people in Sydney.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the age-standardised prevalence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in a metropolitan area of Sydney, with a focus on its prevalence among older people. DESIGN, SETTING: Population-based epidemiological study of people with IBD in the City of Canada Bay, a local government area in the inner west of Sydney, during 1 March 2016 - 10 November 2016. PARTICIPANTS: Patients diagnosed with confirmed IBD according to the Copenhagen or revised Porto criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Crude prevalence of IBD, including Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis; age-standardised prevalence of IBD, based on the World Health Organization standard population; prevalence rates among people aged 65 years or more. RESULTS: The median age of 364 people with IBD was 47 years (IQR, 34-62 years); 185 were women (50.8%). The crude IBD prevalence rate was 414 cases (95% CI, 371-456 cases) per 100 000 population; the age-standardised rate was 348 cases (95% CI, 312-385 cases) per 100 000 population. The age-standardised rate for Crohn disease was 166 cases (95% CI, 141-192 cases) per 100 000 population; for ulcerative colitis, 148 cases (95% CI, 124-171 cases) per 100 000 population. The IBD prevalence rate in people aged 65 years or more was 612 cases (95% CI, 564-660 cases) per 100 000, and for those aged 85 years or more, 891 cases (95% CI, 833-949 cases) per 100 000; for people under 65, the rate was 380 cases (95% CI, 342-418 cases) per 100 000. CONCLUSIONS: We found that the prevalence of confirmed IBD in a metropolitan sample was highest among older people. Challenges for managing older patients with IBD include higher rates of comorbid conditions, polypharmacy, and cognitive decline, and the immunosuppressive nature of standard therapies for IBD.

Gastroenterologists' preference and risk perception on the use of immunomodulators and biological therapies in elderly patients with ulcerative colitis: an international survey.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Comorbidities, polypharmacy, malignancies, and infections complicate management of elderly patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). This study assessed gastroenterologists' preference in the prescription of medications or surgery to elderly patients with IBD, and the factors associated with their choices. METHODS: An international case-based survey was conducted that presented three cases of steroid-dependent ulcerative colitis assessing young-age versus elderly-age patients, with and without comorbidity. Physician characteristics and practice demographics were collected. Factors associated with selection of different choices of therapy were determined by logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: A total of 424 respondents from 41 countries were included. Vedolizumab (53.2%) and thiopurines (19.4%) were the top treatment preferences for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (P < 0.0001). Comorbidity and older age were independently associated with more frequent use of vedolizumab (P < 0.0001), and less frequent use of immunomodulators and anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF; P < 0.0001). Comorbidity was the only independent predictor for selecting colectomy (P < 0.0001). A history of lymphoma (94%) and opportunistic infection (78.3%) were the most frequent conditions precluding the use of thiopurine and anti-TNF in elderly patients with IBD. Only 6.1% of respondents considered patient age a limit for vedolizumab, while 37.9% considered age as a limiting factor in prescribing thiopurines (P < 0.001). Geographical heterogeneity was identified with significantly more physicians from Oceania and North America favouring the use of vedolizumab. CONCLUSION: Vedolizumab was the preferred first-line agent in the treatment of elderly patients with IBD with steroid-dependent moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Older age and presence of comorbidity influenced the selection of medication. Comorbidity was the main predictor of colectomy. Geographical heterogeneity in prescribing habits may relate to medication reimbursement in individual countries.

Safety of drugs used for the treatment of Crohn's disease.

INTRODUCTION: Medications in treating Crohn's disease (CD) have evolved over the last two decades, particularly with the use of biologic agents. There are, however, concerns about the safety and adverse events associated with these medications. The authors review the safety profile of immunosuppressive medications used in Crohn's disease in adult patients. AREAS COVERED: The authors performed a literature search until October 2018 to examine safety data on thiopurines, methotrexate, anti-TNFα agents, vedolizumab and ustekinumab. The authors focused on 'trial' and 'real-world' data for the biologic agents. Safety in pregnancy and the elderly are also presented. EXPERT OPINION: Available data in CD suggest that immunosuppressive medications are relatively safe, although there are concerns about an elevated risk of serious infections, skin cancer and lymphoma particularly with thiopurines and anti-TNFα agents. Data on vedolizumab and ustekinumab suggest these newer biologic agents are well tolerated; however, longer term data in CD are required to identify risks with extended use. Apart from methotrexate, there appear to be no adverse congenital outcomes with exposure of drugs during pregnancy.

Serological Epithelial Component Proteins Identify Intestinal Complications in Crohn's Disease.

Crohn's Disease (CD) is a relapsing inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract that affects a young working age population and is increasing in developing countries. Half of all sufferers will experience stricturing or fistulizing intestinal complications that require extensive surgical interventions and neither genes nor clinical risk factors can predict this debilitating natural history. We applied discovery and verification phase studies as part of an NCI-FDA modeled biomarker pipeline to identify differences in the low-mass (<25kDa) blood-serum proteome between CD behavioral phenotypes. A significant enrichment of epithelial component proteins was identified in CD patients with intestinal complications using quantitative proteomic profiling with label-free Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). DAVID 6.7 (NIH) was used for functional annotation analysis of detected proteins and immunoblotting and multiple reaction monitoring (MRM) to verify a priori findings in a secondary independent cohort of complicated CD (CCD), uncomplicated inflammatory CD (ICD), Th1/17 pathway inflammation controls (rheumatoid arthritis), inflammatory bowel disease controls (ulcerative colitis), and healthy controls. Seventy-six high-confidence serum proteins were modulated in CCD versus ICD by LC-MS/MS (p < 0.05, FDR q<0.01), annotating to pathways of epithelial barrier homeostasis (p < 0.01). In verification phase, a putative serology panel developed from discovery proteomics data consisting of desmoglein-1, desmoplakin, and fatty acid-binding protein 5 (FABP5) distinguished CCD from all other groups (p = 0.041) and discriminated complication in CD (70% sensitivity and 72.5% specificity at score ≥1.907, AUC = 0.777, p = 0.007). An MRM assay secondarily confirmed increased FABP5 levels in CCD (p < 0.001). In a longitudinal subanalysis-cohort, FABP5 levels were stable over a two-month period with no behavioral changes (p = 0.099). These studies along the biomarker development pipeline provide substantial proof-of-principle that a blood test can be developed specific to transmural intestinal injury. Data are available via the PRIDE proteomics data repository under identifier PXD001821 and PeptideAtlas with identifier PASS00661.

Cryptococcal osteomyelitis of the skull in a liver transplant patient.

Cryptococcus neoformans is an opportunistic fungal pathogen and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in immunocompromised patients. We report a case of osteomyelitis caused by C. neoformans in a liver transplant recipient who presented with a headache and scalp lump after sustaining mild head trauma. There was no evidence of central nervous system involvement or dissemination. This is the first known case report of isolated cryptococcal osteomyelitis in a liver transplant recipient.