Effect of itraconazole on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone and methylprednisolone and cortisol secretion in healthy subjects.

AIMS: Itraconazole is a potent inhibitor of CYP3A4 activity and is often used in combination with corticosteroids. Since the latter are partly metabolized by CYP3A4, we studied the interaction between itraconazole, prednisone and methylprednisolone in healthy male subjects. METHODS: The effects of 4 days administration of oral itraconazole (400 mg on the first day then 200 mg day-1 for 3 days) on the pharmacokinetics of prednisolone after a single oral dose of prednisone (60 mg) and the pharmacokinetics of methylprednisolone after single oral dose of methylprednisolone (48 mg) were studied in 14 healthy male subjects in a two-period cross-over trial. Plasma cortisol concentrations were determined as a pharmacodynamic index. RESULTS: Itraconazole increased the mean area under the methylprednisolone concentration-time curve from 2773 ng ml-1 h to 7011 ng ml-1 h (P < 0.001) and the elimination half-life from 3.2 h to 5.5 h (P < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of prednisolone were unchanged. Cortisol concentrations at 24 h were lower after administration of methylprednisolone with itraconazole than after methylprednisolone alone (24 ng ml-1 vs 109 ng ml-1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Itraconazole increased methylprednisolone concentrations markedly with enhanced suppression of endogenous cortisol secretion, but had no effect on prednisolone pharmacokinetics. The pharmacokinetic interaction between methylprednisolone and itraconazole is probably related to inhibition of hepatic CYP3A4 activity by itraconazole.

Benefits from mianserin augmentation of fluoxetine in patients with major depression non-responders to fluoxetine alone.

OBJECTIVE: To assess, in depressed patients, the clinical benefit of mianserin augmentation of fluoxetine or the the benefit of switching treatment from fluoxetine to mianserin. METHOD: In a 6-week double-blind study we compared the therapeutic efficiency and tolerance of mianserin 60 mg/day (N = 34), mianserin 60 mg/day plus fluoxetine 20 mg/day (N = 32) and continuing fluoxetine 20 mg/day (N = 38) in patients with major depression who did not respond to previous fluoxetine treatment. RESULTS: Intent-to-treat analysis showed that at week 6 the decrease in the Hamilton Depression rating scale score was significantly (P < or = 0.03) greater in the mianserin plus fluoxetine group when compared to the fluoxetine group (effect size 0.665). Switching from fluoxetine to mianserin gave intermediate results. Mianserin augmentation of fluoxetine was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Mianserin augmentation of fluoxetine in patients non-responders to fluoxetine 20 mg/day increases response to treatment and is well tolerated.

Serotonin and tolerance to delay of reward in rats.

RATIONALE: Tolerance to delay of gratification, taken to reflect impulsiveness, has been proposed to be under the preferential control of central serotonin (5-HT) processes. OBJECTIVE: The present study further examined the effects of drugs which directly or indirectly alter 5-HT transmission, on behaviour controlled by a delayed positive reinforcer. METHODS: Rats were given the choice in a T-maze between two magnitudes of reward: small (two food pellets) and immediate versus large (ten pellets) but delayed. When a 15-s waiting period was imposed in the arm leading to the large reward, rats selected this arm on 65-70% of the trials. This frequency was reduced to less than 40% when the large reward was delayed by 25 s. RESULTS: In rats whose ascending 5-HT pathways had been lesioned by infusion of 5,7-dihydroxytryptamine (5,7-DHT) into the dorsal raphe, the introduction of the 15-s delay contingency resulted in a transient larger reduction of the frequency of choice of the now-delayed reward, compared to sham operated controls. In contrast, choice behaviour of rats given 5,7-DHT into the substantia nigra did not differ from controls. para-Chlorophenylalanine (pCPA, 150 mg/kg IP, daily for 3 days), a 5-HT synthesis inhibitor, bretazenil (0.5-8 mg/kg IP), a benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor partial agonist, and muscimol (0.25-1 mg/kg IP), a GABA(A) receptor agonist, induced a shift toward immediate reward. In contrast to the other BZDs, alprazolam (1-2 mg/kg IP) enhanced the frequency of choice of the large-but-25 s-delayed reward. Similar increased preference for the large-but-delayed reward was induced by the selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitors, fluoxetine (4-8 mg/kg IP) and fluvoxamine (4 mg/kg IP). The full 5-HT(1A) receptor agonist, 8-OH-DPAT (0.015-0.5 mg/kg IP) enhanced the frequency of choice of the large reward delayed by 25 s, whereas the partial agonists, buspirone (1-4 mg/kg IP), ipsapirone (0.5-1 mg/kg IP) and MDL 73005EF (1-2 mg/kg SC), and the antagonist, WAY 100635 (4 mg/kg SC), reduced the number of choices of the large reward delayed by 15 s. Unexpectedly, WAY 100635 (2 mg/kg), which had no effect on choice whatever the delay, did not counteract the increased tolerance to delay induced by 8-OH-DPAT (0.06 mg/kg) and further reduced the frequency of choice of the large-but- 15 s-delayed reward induced by ipsapirone (0.5 mg/kg). CONCLUSIONS: These effects on tolerance to delay may be accounted for by a subtle balance between the opposing functional consequences of pre- versus post-synaptic 5-HT(1A) receptor activation or blockade. Overall, the present results provide further support to the idea that 5-HT processes participate in the control of impulsive-related behaviour, as assessed from tolerance to delay of reward in this particular T-maze procedure.

Agreement between 'time-blind' and 'time-non-blind' assessments of depressive symptomatology.

In a 4-week study, two methods were used simultaneously in the assessment of depressive symptomatology with videotaped structured clinical interviews: a 'time-non-blind' (TNB) method (chronological order, observer aware of the previous duration of drug treatment) and a 'time-blind' (TB) method (no chronological order, rater unaware of the previous duration of treatment). Sixty newly admitted depressed inpatients with Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale scores higher than 20 were assessed before (D0), after 10 days (D10) and after 28 days (D28) of antidepressant treatment. Agreement between TNB and TB methods on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, measured by intra-class correlation coefficients, was good at D0 (0.68), excellent at D10 (0.81) and D28 (0.86), but not significantly different between D0, D10 and D28. The statistical method of Bland and Altman (1986) was also used to evaluate the degree of agreement. Results of this second analysis were in accordance with the intra-class correlation coefficient results, and showed significantly (P < 0.05) higher D0-D28 and D10-D28 intrasubject changes with the TB method, which were largely accounted for by some particular items (inner tension, pessimism, lassitude). With the Clinical Global Impression-Severity score, the Bland and Altman method failed to show significant differences between the two methods, and compared with the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, intra-class correlation coefficients were lower with larger confidence intervals, suggesting that global ratings are less reliable than itemized symptom ratings.

Anhedonia and relapse in alcoholism.

The aim of this study was to determine the role of anhedonia among other psychopathological dimensions in the relapse of alcoholics 6 months after withdrawal. Psychometric assessments included: the Social and Physical Anhedonia Scales, the Sensation Seeking Scale, the Pleasure-Displeasure Scale (including Fawcett-Clark's Pleasure Scale), the Depressive Mood Scale, the Thymasthenic Syndrome Rating Scale and the Comprehensive Psychopathological Rating Scale. Forty-four alcoholics participated in the study. The baseline values recorded during the second week of treatment showed that the more anhedonic the alcoholics were, the less they sought sensations. Type 2 alcoholics (Cloninger's classification) scored higher on the Thrill and Adventure Seeking Subscale. Relapsed alcoholics had higher baseline values on the Thrill and Adventure Seeking Subscale. This was in agreement with the step-wise discriminant analysis which showed that this subscale was the main variable that differentiated abstinent alcoholics from those who relapsed. Our results indicate that anhedonia does not predict relapse.

Blunted 5-HT1A-receptor agonist-induced corticotropin and cortisol responses after long-term ipsapirone and fluoxetine administration to healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVES: To assess whether acute 5-hydroxytryptamine-1A (5-HT1A)-receptor-mediated corticotropin, cortisol, and temperature responses are maintained after 3 weeks of treatment with controlled-release (CR) ipsapirone and fluoxetine compared with placebo and whether changes are reversible after cessation of treatment. METHODS: This was a randomized parallel-group study. Ten healthy subjects received ipsapirone CR or fluoxetine, and eight received placebo in a double-blind manner. An ipsapirone challenge test with 20 mg ipsapirone immediate-release formulation (IR) was performed before treatment (day 0) and after 20 days of treatment with placebo, 80 mg/day ipsapirone CR, or 20 mg/day fluoxetine (day 21). From day 22 to day 34 all subjects received placebo in a simple-blind manner. A third ipsapirone challenge test was performed on day 35. RESULTS: Before treatment, resting plasma corticotropin and cortisol concentrations and increases in plasma corticotropin and cortisol concentrations after challenge with 20 mg ipsapirone IR were similar for the three groups. After 20 days of treatment, plasma corticotropin and cortisol concentrations were similar before challenge, but ipsapirone IR-induced increases in plasma corticotropin and cortisol concentrations were significantly lower in both the ipsapirone CR group (corticotropin, 6.5 +/- 2 pg/ml; cortisol, 1.5 +/- 0.7 micrograms/dl) and fluoxetine group (corticotropin 4.4 +/- 2 pg/ml; cortisol 1.5 +/- 0.7 micrograms/dl) compared with placebo (corticotropin, 34 +/- 14 pg/ml; cortisol, 5.8 +/- 2 micrograms/dl, mean +/- SEM). After 2 weeks of placebo administration, plasma corticotropin and cortisol responses to ipsapirone IR again became identical in all three groups. Plasma ipsapirone concentrations were similar in all groups during each challenge. The hypothermic response to ipsapirone IR showed no difference before treatment, at the end of the treatment period, or 2 weeks after cessation of treatment. Long-term administration of antidepressants to the healthy subjects did not lead to any serious adverse effects. CONCLUSIONS: Long-term administration of fluoxetine and ipsapirone did not influence resting plasma corticotropin and cortisol concentrations in the morning. Stimulation of corticotropin and cortisol release by a selective 5-HT1A-agonist is reduced with long-term administration of these serotoninergic antidepressants. This subsensitivity of postsynaptic 5-HT1A-receptors is reversible.

Involvement of central cannabinoid (CB1) receptors in the establishment of place conditioning in rats.

The involvement of cannabinoid processes in positive reinforcement was studied using an unbiased, one-compartment, conditioned place preference (CPP) procedure in rats. This was achieved by examining the ability of the selective antagonist of the CB1 cannabinoid receptor subtype, SR 141716, to counteract the CPP supported by classical reinforcers. The acquisition of CPP induced by cocaine (2 mg/kg), morphine (4 mg/kg) and food (standard chow and sucrose pellets) was dose-dependently blocked by pre-pairing administration of SR 141716 (0.03-3 mg/kg). However, SR 141716 (up to 10 mg/kg) did not significantly counteract the expression of cocaine-induced CPP. On the other hand, the synthetic CB receptor agonist, WIN 55212-2 (0.3-1 mg/kg), established a robust place aversion (CPA), as already described with other agonists, and CPP was never observed, even at 100-fold lower doses. The aversive effect of WIN 55212-2 was reversed by SR 141716 (0.3-1 mg/kg), suggesting that it was accounted for by the stimulation of CB1 receptors. These findings indicate that, on their own, CB receptor agonists are unable to generate the processes necessary to induce a pleasurable state in animals, as assessed in place conditioning procedures. Nevertheless, a cannabinoid link may be involved in the neurobiological events, allowing the perception of the rewarding value of various kinds of reinforcers. However, a permanent endogenous cannabinoid tone seems unlikely to be necessary to ensure the organism a basal hedonic level since, given alone, SR 141716 supported neither CPP nor CPA.

Whole blood serotonin content, tryptophan concentrations, and impulsivity in anorexia nervosa.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that anorectics with or without bulimic features would differ on impulsivity and indices of central serotoninergic function (high impulsivity being correlated with reduced serotoninergic function). METHODS: For all patients impulsivity rating scales and questionnaires detailing severity of eating disorder were assessed, and whole blood serotonin concentration (5-HT), free and total tryptophan (TT) concentrations, and large neutral amino acids (LNAA) were assayed. RESULTS: Nineteen patients with anorexia nervosa were included, 10 presented associated bulimic features and nine did not. Twelve healthy matched controls were also included. Our hypothesis was not verified. However, tryptophan concentration and the ratio of tryptophan concentration to LNAA allow us to separate controls from anorectics, whereas 5-HT concentration does not. Two significant and positive correlations were found: between impulsivity and anxiety in the total anorectic population, and between anxiety and serotonin in the impulsive group. CONCLUSIONS: All measured peripheral biologic indices except 5-HT concentration may be of interest in this pathology. Impulsivity and anxiety seem to be two personality components involved in anorexia nervosa. This study lead us to the necessity of redefining impulsivity in anorexia nervosa.

Measures of anhedonia and hedonic responses to sucrose in depressive and schizophrenic patients in comparison with healthy subjects.

Anhedonia may be considered as a transnosological feature of depression and schizophrenia. The aim of the present study was to assess hedonic responses to sucrose solutions and sweet taste perception threshold in patients with major depression and in schizophrenic patients in comparison with healthy subjects (matched for age and gender with depressive patients), and to compare these responses to evaluations by the Physical and Social Anhedonia scale of Chapman and the Pleasure Scale of Fawcett, generally used to quantify anhedonia. Hedonic responses to sucrose solutions were similar in patients with major depression (n = 20), schizophrenia (n = 20), and healthy controls (n = 20). Sweet taste perception threshold was significantly higher in depressive patients than in controls. Hedonic response to sucrose was inversely correlated with physical Anhedonia Scores and sweet taste perception threshold with Pleasure Scale scores. Measures of hedonia/anhedonia were not related with the intensity of depression or anxiety as measured by the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and Hamilton Anxiety Scale, respectively. In 11 depressed patients hospitalised for 17 to 33 days, neither hedonic ratings to sucrose solutions, sweet taste perception threshold, Physical, Social Anhedonia scores nor Pleasure Scale scores were modified in spite of substantial decrease in MADRS or Hamilton Anxiety scores. Hedonic responses to sucrose solutions and sweet taste perception threshold may be used as complementary evaluation to quantify anhedonia.

Sensitivity and specificity to amphetamine of a French version of the 49-item form of the addiction research center inventory.

The main metrological characteristics of a French version of the 49-item addiction research center inventory (ARCI) were evaluated using data collected in three controlled studies in healthy subjects. An analysis of variance showed no study effect, so the three studies were pooled. The test-retest reliability coefficients after placebo evaluated by a Spearman rank correlation test were 0.64 (P < 0.0001) for subscale A, 0.49 (P < 0.0001) for subscale BG, 0.55 (P < 0.0001) for MBG, 0.58 (P < 0.0001) for PCAG and 0.27 for LSD (not significant). Using the same test, the test-retest reliability coefficients after amphetamine were 0.73 (P < 0.0001) for subscale A, 0.61 (P < 0.0001) for subscale BG, 0.71 (P < 0.0001) for MBG, 0.46 (P < 0.0001) for PCAG and 0.66 for LSD (P < 0.0001). In order to assess the predictive validity of the translated questionnaire, areas under curves were calculated from the ROC diagrams for the three scores, amphetamine (A), benzedrine group (BG) and morphine benzedrine group (MBG). Two criteria validity were used: the desire to take amphetamine another time and the discrimination of the allocated treatment (amphetamine or placebo). The calculated areas under curves indicated a good capacity of prediction of the three ARCI subscales (A, BG, MBG) for both criteria.

Influence of anxiolytic drugs on the effects of specific serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the forced swimming test in mice.

This study aimed at investigating the effect of several selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), given alone or in combination with anxiolytic drugs, on the time spent immobile in the forced swimming test in mice. The time spent immobile was dose-dependently reduced by acute administration of fluoxetine (4-64 mg/ kg, i.p.), paroxetine (1-32 mg/kg, s.c.) or sertraline (4-32 mg/kg, s.c.), indalpine was active at only one dose (16 mg/kg, i.p.), fluvoxamine (up to 16 mg/kg, i.p.) and citalopram (up to 4 mg/kg, i.p.) were inactive. The anti-immobility effect of fluoxetine (32 mg/kg) was antagonized by an acute co-administration of all anxiolytics tested, the GABAA/BZD receptor agonists, diazepam (2 mg/kg, i.p.), chlordiazepoxide (8 mg/kg, i.p.), lorazepam (0.125 mg/kg, i.p.), triazolam (0.06 mg/kg, i.p.) and alpidem (8 mg/kg, i.p.) and the 5-HT1A receptor partial agonist, buspirone (0.5 mg/kg, s.c.). The sedative neuroleptic, thioridazine (4 mg/kg, i.p.), was also found to counteract the effect of fluoxetine. Lorazepam, triazolam and buspirone also reversed the anti-immobility effect of paroxetine and sertraline, while diazepam and chlordiazepoxide did not. Alpidem reduced the effect of sertraline but not paroxetine, whereas the reverse was found with thioridazine. These data indicate that the influence of anxiolytics on the action of SSRI antidepressants is variable, depending on both the SSRI and the anxiolytic considered. The co-administration of the GABAA/BZD receptor antagonist, flumazenil (16 mg/kg, i.p.), with behaviourally inactive doses of fluoxetine, fluvoxamine and citalopram, resulted in a reduction of immobility. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, (+)-WAY 100135 (8 mg/kg, s.c.), combined with a subactive dose of fluoxetine, but not with fluvoxamine, significantly reduced the time spent immobile. The 5-HT2A receptor antagonist, ketanserin (32 mg/kg, s.c.), which reduced immobility when given alone, did not interfere with fluoxetine given at a subactive dose. Although non-specific sedative and/or motor effects cannot be totally ruled out, these results suggest that pharmacodynamic interactions exist between various anxiolytics and SSRIs. These interactions probably involve both serotonergic and GABAergic processes.

Initial monoamine oxidase-A inhibition by moclobemide does not predict the therapeutic response in patients with major depression. A double blind, randomized study.

It is generally accepted that the clinical efficacy of monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOI) is related to inhibition of this enzyme. In order to evaluate the predictive ability of monoamine oxidase-A inhibition for therapeutic efficacy, the start of treatment effects of moclobemide, a selective, reversible monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, on plasma concentrations of monoamines and monoamine metabolites were determined. The plasma levels of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG, deaminated metabolite of noradrenaline), 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA, deaminated metabolite of serotonin), 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid and homovanillic acid (DOPAC and HVA, deaminated metabolites of dopamine), L-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-dopa) and noradrenaline were investigated and related to treatment outcome. This was a randomized double blind parallel group study in 47 patients with criteria of major depression according to DSM III R. Moclobemide 300 mg/day, 450 mg/day or 600 mg/day was administered continuously for 6 weeks. Plasma concentrations of monoamine metabolites and monoamines were determined just before treatment by moclobemide, 4 h after the first dose, 24 h after the first dose, before the first dose on day 7, and 4 h after the first dose, on day 7. Each moclobemide dose improved depression as measured by MADRS (Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating scale) but there was no difference between the three doses. Moclobemide dose-dependently reduced plasma concentration of DHPG, L-dopa and HVA. No dose-dependent treatment effect was observed for plasma 5-HIAA, noradrenaline and DOPAC. The clinical outcome as defined by the final MADRS score was not related to any start of treatment changes in plasma monoamine metabolites reflecting inhibition of MAO-A. It is concluded that monoamine oxidase-A inhibition at the beginning of the treatment does not predict clinical outcome.

Effects of befloxatone, a reversible selective monoamine oxidase-A inhibitor, on psychomotor function and memory in healthy subjects.

Befloxatone is a new reversible and selective monoamine oxidase (MAO-A) inhibitor that has been shown to have antidepressant activity in various animal models. To assess the effects of single oral doses of befloxatone (5, 10, and 20 mg) on psychomotor performance and memory, a randomized, double-blind, five-way, crossover study with both placebo and amitriptyline (50 mg) was carried out in 15 healthy male volunteers. Psychomotor and cognitive functions were evaluated using both objective measures, including Critical Flicker Frequency (CFF), Choice Reaction Time (CRT), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), and a picture memory test and subjective measures, including Visual Analog Scales (VAS) and Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI), before and 2, 4, and 8 hours after administration. Pupil diameter was recorded by videopupillography. Single doses of befloxatone from 5 to 20 mg did not result in any detrimental effects on skilled performance and memory. In contrast, amitriptyline significantly impaired arousal (CFF), speed of reaction (CRT), information processing (DSST) and long-term memory (delayed free recall of pictures) and produced subjective sedation from 2 to 8 hours after administration. At the doses studied amitriptyline induced miosis but befloxatone did not modify pupil diameter. There was no evidence in this study to suggest that befloxatone, at the doses studied, has any sedative or amnesic effects in healthy subjects.

Antagonism by benzodiazepines of the effects of serotonin-, but not norepinephrine-, uptake blockers in the learned helplessness paradigm in rats.

Benzodiazepines are routinely administered in combination with antidepressant drugs. Such combination can induce pharmacodynamic or pharmacokinetic interactions resulting in either a potentiation or a reduction of the effects of one of the drugs. The present study was undertaken to determine the effects of benzodiazepines alone and in combination with two classes of antidepressant drugs: "specific" norepinephrine uptake blockers (desipramine, maprotiline) and specific serotonin uptake blockers (indalpine, fluvoxamine) in the learned helplessness paradigm in rats. The present results show that daily injection of diazepam (0.2-2 mg/kg) and lorazepam (0.06-0.25 mg/kg) did not reverse the helpless behavior. The reversal of helpless behavior induced by indalpine (1 mg/kg/day) or fluvoxamine (4 mg/kg/day) was antagonized dose-dependently by daily coadministration of benzodiazepines. In contrast, the effects of desipramine (24 mg/kg/day) or maprotiline (48 mg/kg/day) were not modified.

Monoamine oxidase A and B activities in heavy smokers.

There is a strong association between depression and smoking. Because monoamine oxidase (MAO) inhibition leads to antidepressant effect and in vitro studies have shown that cigarette smoke inhibits MAO activity, it is conceivable that smoking may have an antidepressant effect, if smokers have reduced MAO activity. Therefore, we assessed platelet MAO-B activity and plasma concentration of catecholamine metabolites reflecting MAO-A activity in heavy dependent smokers and nonsmokers matched for sociodemographic characteristics. Platelet MAO-B activity, plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol, plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, and plasma 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine concentrations were significantly lower in smokers than in nonsmokers, whereas plasma norepinephrine did not differ. Significantly more smokers reported previous history of depression, manic episode, panic attack, agoraphobia, and simple phobia. Smokers had higher scores (p < 0.001) on the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and the Hamilton Anxiety Scales. It is concluded that the activities of both forms of the MAO are reduced in heavy dependent smokers.

A reversible monoamine oxidase A inhibitor (moclobemide) facilitates smoking cessation and abstinence in heavy, dependent smokers.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of moclobemide on smoking cessation and abstinence in heavy, dependent smokers. There is a strong association between smoking and depression, especially in dependent smokers. It was hypothesized that smoking is a self-medication to treat depression. Cigarette smoke has monoamine oxidase (MAO)-inhibitory properties, and smokers have lower MAO activity than non-smokers. METHODS: We used a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled parallel-group study. Placebo or moclobemide, 400 mg/day for 2 months and 200 mg/day during the third month, was given. Main outcome measures were self-reported and biochemically verified (plasma cotinine levels, < 20 ng/ml) abstinence rate. Secondary outcome measures were withdrawal symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Hamilton anxiety rating scores, platelet MAO-B activity, and plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol as a measure of MAO-A activity. RESULTS: Eighty-eight smokers were randomized to receive moclobemide (n = 44) or placebo (n = 44). The continuous self-reported abstinence rate was higher with moclobemide than with placebo (intention-to-treat analysis until the end point, 6 months: p < 0.05; until the end of follow-up, 1 year: p = 0.09). The abstinence rate according to plasma cotinine levels showed a trend to effectiveness of moclobemide (end point: p = 0.13; follow-up: p = 0.12). Platelet MAO-B activity increased after smoking cessation but without a significant difference. Plasma dihydroxyphenylglycol levels did not change in the placebo group but decreased dose dependently in the moclobemide group. No difference occurred for withdrawal symptoms, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and Hamilton anxiety scores. Cessation of moclobemide had no adverse effect. More subjects reported insomnia with moclobemide (n = 16) than with placebo (n = 3). CONCLUSION: In this preliminary study, the reversible, selective MAO inhibitor moclobemide facilitated smoking cessation in highly dependent smokers. Further studies with substantially more smokers are needed to evaluate the role of MAO inhibitors in smoking cessation and abstinence in smokers with high nicotine dependence.

Failure of CCK receptor ligands to modify anxiety-related behavioural suppression in an operant conflict paradigm in rats.

The effects of cholecystokinin (CCK) receptor ligands were studied in the rat safety signal withdrawal conflict procedure, an operant paradigm sensitive to both anxiolytic and anxiogenic compounds. In this procedure, behavioural suppression of lever pressing for food was induced by the withdrawal of a conditioned signal for safety without the usual presentation of a conditioned signal for danger. The compounds tested were selective CCK-B antagonists [CI-988 (0.01-1 mg/kg SC), L-365,260 (0.004-2 mg/kg IP) and LY 262,691 (0.001-1 mg/kg SC)], CCK-B agonists [CCK-4 (0.01-1 mg/kg SC) and BC 264 (0.004-1 mg/kg IP)] and CCK-A antagonists [devazepide (0.001-1 mg/kg SC) and lorglumide (0.01-1 mg/kg SC)]. None of these drugs induced the expected behavioural effects, i.e. an anxiolytic-like release of the behavioural suppression with CCK-B and, possibly, CCK-A antagonists and/or a further reduction of lever pressing with CCK-B agonists, indicative of an anxiogenic-like potential. In contrast, the established anxiolytic lorazepam (0.06-0.25 mg/kg IP), as well as diazepam (2 mg/kg IP) and buspirone (0.25 mg/kg SC) used as positive control drugs, released the suppression of pressing for food during the period associated with the safety signal withdrawal, whereas picrotoxin (1 mg/kg IP), used as an anxiogenic control, further reduced responding during this conflict period. The present results contrast with a series of published data suggesting the involvement of CCK processes in anxiety-related behaviour in rodent models such as the elevated plus-maze or the light:dark two compartment test, and in panic disorders in humans.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Single dose of prednisone does not induce amphetamine-like subjective effects in healthy subjects.

Among the methods developed in assessing abuse liability, the behavioural and subjective effects of drugs can be recorded using the Addiction Research Center Inventory (ARCI) in drug-experienced subjects and normal volunteers. Sixteen healthy volunteers with no history of drug abuse participated in the study. The subjective, behavioural and physiological effects of prednisone (30 and 60 mg) were compared with those of dextroamphetamine (15 mg) and placebo in a randomized double-blind Latin square design. The self-questionnaires (ARCI, Profile of Mood States, Visual Analogue Scales and Sleep Questionnaire) were completed before, 1, 2, 4 and 8 h post single oral dosing. Results showed that subjective effects of the two studied doses of prednisone did not resemble those induced by dextroamphetamine (15 mg). These results indicate that oral single doses of prednisone do not possess amphetamine-like subjective effects in a healthy population. The well established psychostimulant effect of amphetamine have been replicated on almost all subjective assessments.