Navigated "small implants" in knee reconstruction.

PURPOSE: At the beginning of this century, unprecedented interest in the concept of using less invasive approaches for the treatment of knee degenerative diseases was ignited. Initial interest in this approach was about navigated and non-navigated knee reconstruction using small implants and conventional total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: To this end, a review of the published literature relating to less invasive compartmental arthroplasty of the knee using computer-based alignment techniques and on soft tissue-dedicated small implants is presented. The authors present and compare their personal results using these techniques with those reported in the current literature. These involved the use of a shorter incision and an emphasis sparing. However, nowadays most surgeons look at compartmental knee resurfacing with the use of small implants as the new customized approach for younger and higher-demand patients. The aim of this paper is to stimulate further debate. RESULTS: Since the beginning of 2000, computer-assisted surgery has been applied to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and later to compartmental knee arthroplasty. Recent studies in the literature have reported better implant survivorship for younger patients using navigation in TKA at longer-term follow-up. Only one published report was identified showing superior clinical outcomes at short-term follow-up using computer-assisted technology compared with conventional alignment techniques in small implant surgery. No studies were found in the literature that demonstrated similar clinical advantages with navigated small implants at long-term follow-up. Two published meta-analyses were identified reporting better implant and limb alignment and no increase in complications using a navigated unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. However, neither meta-analysis showed superior clinical outcomes or survivorship with the navigated techniques. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we can assert that replacing just the damaged compartment and preserving the normal biomechanics will require not only new implant designs but also new technologies allowing the surgeon to make extremely precise adjustments to implant alignment and providing continuous feedback during surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

A flat all-polyethylene tibial component in medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a long-term study.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study is to present the clinical and radiological results of a cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) using a flat all-polyethylene tibial component at long-term follow-up, in a homogeneous group of patients with medial femoro-tibial knee arthritis. METHODS: The study group included 53 knees in 51 patients who were treated between January 1998 and November 1999 using a flat all-polyethylene tibial component. The same surgical technique was used for all patients. Inclusion criteria included a diagnosis of atraumatic arthritis, pre-operative flexion greater than 100° with no flexion deformity, a varus deformity of less than 10°, and a body mass index (BMI) less than 35. A neutral mechanical axis was considered the end-point in all interventions. The patients were assessed clinically using the International Knee Society (IKS) and the functional scores at follow-up. Plain radiographs were used to determine the alignment of the mechanical axis at 5, 10 and 14.7-year follow-up. A radiographic analysis of loosening, based on the method described by the IKS, was performed and the degree of arthritic progression in the non-resurfaced compartment was also assessed. RESULTS: At latest follow-up five patients had died and the data for three patients had not been collected. At final review four knees had undergone revision surgery and a further patient had declined a recommended revision TKA. The main indication for revision surgery was progressive aseptic loosening of the tibial component in female patients. No revisions were required because of arthritic progression in the lateral compartment. Over time the clinical outcomes did not show statistically significant differences. There was a significant worsening of the mechanical axis at the last follow-up compared with the results at five and ten year review. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that, in primary arthritis involving the medial femoro-tibial compartment, UKA using a flat all-polyethylene component could be considered an effective surgical option. Attention should be paid to progressive worsening of the mechanical axis over time associated with progressive radiolucency especially in female patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Post traumatic knee arthritis: navigated total knee replacement without hardware removal.

BACKGROUND: The Authors present the results of a series of navigated total knee replacements (TKR) without hardware removal in patients with post-traumatic arthritis following femoral fractures. The purpose of the paper was to determine the effectiveness of computer-assisted TKR in these patients compared to routine primary implants. METHODS: Sixteen patients with post-traumatic knee arthritis following a distal femoral fracture and retained hardware were included in the study (group I). Patients in the study group were matched with patients who had undergone a computer navigated TKR using the same implant and software (group II). The indication for TKR in all group II patients was atraumatic arthritis and surgery was performed in the same period as the study group. Patients were matched for age, gender, pre-operative range of motion, severity of arthritis pre-operatively, type and grade of deformity and implant features. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time, hospital staying or intra-operative and post-operative complications between the two study groups. At the latest follow-up no statistically significant difference was seen for the Knee Society Score and WOMAC indices. Implant alignment and radiological parameters were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that post-traumatic knee arthritis following prior distal femoral fracture can be safely managed using a computer navigated TKR without hardware removal. Comparison between this patient group and a matched group with atraumatic arthritis showed similar post-operative results and complication rates. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Computer-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using dedicated software versus a conventional technique.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to retrospectively compare the results of two matched-paired groups of patients who had undergone a medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) performed using either a conventional or a non-image-guided navigation technique specifically designed for unicompartmental prosthesis implantation. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with isolated medial-compartment knee arthritis who underwent an isolated navigated UKA were included in the study (group A) and matched with patients who had undergone a conventional medial UKA (group B). The same inclusion criteria were used for both groups. At a minimum of six months, all patients were clinically assessed using the Knee Society Score (KSS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) index. Radiographically, the frontal-femoral-component angle, the frontal-tibial-component angle, the hip-knee-ankle angle and the sagittal orientation of components (slopes) were evaluated. Complications related to the implantation technique, length of hospital stay and surgical time were compared. RESULTS: At the latest follow-up, no statistically significant differences were seen in the KSS, function scores and WOMAC index between groups. Patients in group B had a statistically significant shorter mean surgical time. Tibial coronal and sagittal alignments were statistically better in the navigated group, with five cases of outliers in the conventional alignment technique group. Postoperative mechanical axis was statistically better aligned in the navigated group, with two cases of overcorrection from varus to valgus in group B. No differences in length of hospital stay or complications related to implantation technique were seen between groups. CONCLUSION: This study shows that a specifically designed UKA-dedicated navigation system results in better implant alignment in UKA surgery. Whether this improved alignment results in better clinical results in the long term has yet to be proven.

Spontaneous patella fracture associated with anterior tibial tubercle pseudarthrosis in a revised knee replacement following knee arthrodesis.

BACKGROUND: Conversion of a knee arthrodesis to a Total Knee Arthroplasty is an uncommon procedure. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in this setting presents the surgeon with a number of challenges including the management of the extensor mechanism and patella. CASE PRESENTATION: We describe a unique case of a 69 years old Caucasian man who underwent a revision Total Knee Arthroplasty using a tibial tubercle osteotomy after a previous conversion of a knee arthrodesis without patella resurfacing. Unfortunately 9 months following surgery a tibial tubercle pseudarthrosis and spontaneous patella fracture occurred. Both were managed with open reduction and internal fixation. At 30 months follow-up the tibial tubercle osteotomy had completely consolidated while the patella fracture was still evident but with no signs of further displacement. The patient was completely satisfied with the outcome and had a painless range of knee flexion between 0-95°. CONCLUSIONS: We believe that patients undergoing this type of surgery require careful counseling regarding the risk of complications both during and after surgery despite strong evidence supporting improved functional outcomes.

An uncommon cause of cemented unicompartmental knee arthroplasty failure: fracture of metallic components.

PURPOSE: Despite good overall clinical results, unicompartmental knee replacements (UKR) are not without their problems and failures have been reported. The most common causes of UKR failure are component loosening, poor patient selection, poor surgical technique, polyethylene wear and progression of arthritis in other compartments. The purpose of this study is to present a series of atraumatic fractures of metallic components in a UKR treated in a single orthopaedic centre. METHOD: Since 1999, 121 failed unicompartmental knee arthroplasties have been referred to our centre. In six of these, atraumatic breakage of a metal component in the cemented UKR was seen and included in this study. Pre-operative alignment, BMI and implant longevity were documented. The femoral implant failed in 4 patients and the tibial implant in a further 2. RESULTS: All the femoral implant fractures occurred within 3 years of UKR surgery (mean: 22.2 months, SD: 10.6 months). Tibial implant breakage occurred at a mean of 8.5 years (SD: 2.4 months) following UKR. All patients were treated with conversion to a navigated total knee replacement. A primary total knee arthroplasty was used in all cases with one patient requiring a tibial component incorporating a wedge and stem following breakage of the original UKR tibial implant. CONCLUSION: Fracture of the metallic components is a potential cause of failure of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. In our experience, the incidence of this complication was 4.9 % of all UKR failures. Patients with a BMI greater than 30 and a progressive deterioration in limb alignment were at greater risk.

Computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty after prior femoral fracture without hardware removal.

This study presents a consecutive series of patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty (TKA) after prior distal femoral fracture without hardware removal. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of computer-assisted TKA in patients with posttraumatic arthritis, specifically those with retained hardware after prior distal femoral fracture. The study group included a consecutive series of 16 patients who had developed posttraumatic knee arthritis after a distal femoral fracture with retention of hardware (group A). Patients in the study group were matched with patients who had undergone a computer-assisted TKA using the same implant and software (group B). The indication for TKA in all group B patients was atraumatic arthritis, and surgery was performed during the same period as that in the study group. Patients were matched for age, sex, preoperative range of motion, preoperative severity of arthritis, type and grade of deformity, and implant features. No statistically significant differences existed between the 2 study groups in terms of operative time, duration of hospital stay, or intra- and postoperative complications. At last follow-up, no statistically significant differences existed in Knee Society Scores and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index scores. Implant alignment and radiological parameters were similar in both groups. This study demonstrated that posttraumatic knee arthritis after prior distal femoral fracture can be safely managed using a computer-assisted TKA without hardware removal. Comparison between the study group and a matched group with atraumatic arthritis showed similar postoperative results and complication rates.

Does computer-assisted surgery benefit leg length restoration in total hip replacement? Navigation versus conventional freehand.

Leg length discrepancy following total hip replacement (THR) can contribute to poor hip function. Abnormal gait, pain, neurological disturbance and patient dissatisfaction have all been described as a result of leg length inequality after THR. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of computer navigation in THR can improve limb length restoration and early clinical outcomes. We performed a matched-pair study comparing 48 computer-assisted THR with 48 THRs performed using a traditional freehand alignment method. The same implant with a straight non-modular femoral stem was used in all cases. The navigation system used allowed the surgeon to monitor both acetabular cup placement and all the phases of femoral stem implantation including rasping. Patients were matched for age, sex, arthritis level, pre-operative diagnosis and pre-operative leg length discrepancy. At a minimum follow-up of six months, limb length discrepancy was measured using digital radiographs and a standardised protocol. The number of patients with a residual discrepancy of 10 mm or more and/or a post-operative over-lengthening were measured. The clinical outcome was evaluated using both the Harris Hip Score and the normalised Western Ontario and McMaster Universities (WOMAC) Arthritis Index. Restoration of limb length was significantly better in the computer-assisted THR group. The number of patients with a residual limb length discrepancy greater than 10 mm and/or a post-operative over-lengthening was significantly lower. No significant difference in the Harris Hip Score or normalised WOMAC Arthritis Index was seen between the two groups. The surgical time was significantly longer in the computer-assisted THR group. No post-operative dislocations were seen.

Relationship between cutting errors and learning curve in computer-assisted total knee replacement.

Computer-assisted total knee replacement (TKR) has been shown to improve radiographic alignment. Continuous feedback from the navigation system allows accurate adjustment of the bone cuts, thus reducing errors. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of experience both with computer navigation and knee replacement surgery on the frequency of errors in intraoperative bone cuts and implant alignment. Three homogeneous patient groups undergoing computer assisted TKR were included in the study. Each group was treated by one of three surgeons with varying experience in computer-aided and knee replacement surgery. Surgeon A had extensive experience in knee replacement and computer-assisted surgery. Surgeon B was an experienced knee replacement surgeon. A general orthopaedic surgeon with limited knee replacement surgery experience performed all surgeries in group C. The cutting errors and the number of re-cuts were determined intraoperatively. The complications and mean surgical time were collected for each group. The postoperative frontal femoral component angle, frontal tibial component angle, hip-knee-ankle angle and component slopes were evaluated. The results showed that the number of cutting errors were lowest for TKR performed by the surgeon with experience in navigation. This difference was statistically significant when compared to the general orthopaedic surgeon. A statistically significant superior result was achieved in final mechanical axis alignment for the surgeon experienced in computer-guided surgery compared to the other two groups (179.3 degrees compared to 178.9 degrees and 178.1 degrees ). However, the total number of outliers was similar, with no statistically significant differences among the three surgeons. Experience with navigation significantly reduced the surgical time.

Computer-assisted alignment system for tibial component placement in total knee replacement: a radiological study.

In total knee replacement (TKR), regarding tibial component positioning, almost all implants offer both an intramedullary and an extramedullary alignment guide, leaving it up to the surgeon which guide to use. However, early failure in TKR can be caused by incorrect positioning or orientation with poor limb alignment. Recently computer-based alignment systems have been developed to help the surgeon to overcome these complications. The Authors retrospectively analysed their experience using a computer-based CT-free alignment system. They assessed the radiological alignment of the tibial components in 38 computer-assisted TKR 6 months after surgery. The frontal tibial component angle (FTC) and the sagittal orientation of the tibial component (slope) were evaluated 6 months after the operation. The results were compared to those achieved with traditional alignment systems. The surgical time was statistically longer in the computer-assisted group but in this group all the tibial components were aligned within 4 degrees of all the ideal measurements in both frontal and sagittal planes.

Leg length discrepancy, dislocation rate, and offset in total hip replacement using a short modular stem: navigation vs conventional freehand.

We present a match-paired study between computer-assisted and freehand techniques using a short modular femoral stem (Metha; B. Braun Aesculap, Tuttlingen, Germany) in total hip replacement (THR). Surgical time, clinical outcome, dislocation rate, limb length, and offset in 44 patients with ideal indication for this more conservative implant were assessed. Despite both longer surgical time and similar early outcomes, the results showed how computer-assisted techniques allow easier management of limb length discrepancy and offset restoring. We believe that navigated short modular stems are safe for less invasive THR.

Mini-incision versus mini-incision and computer-assisted surgery in total knee replacement: a radiological prospective randomised study.

The aim of this trial was to compare the radiological results of 74 patients undergoing a mini-invasive total knee replacement (TKR) using either a traditional alignment guide (MIS group) or a computer assisted alignment system (MICA group). All the patients were prospectively randomised to either group and the same implant was used for both groups. At 8 months post-operatively, the frontal femoral component angle (FFC), the frontal tibial component angle (FTC), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation of components (slopes) were evaluated respectively. The slopes of the femoral component and the FTC angle were statistically better aligned in the MICA group (p<0.001). The MICA group showed both a significant fewer number of outliners and a significant higher number of implants with all five radiological parameters ideally aligned. The operative time was statistically longer in the computer assisted group.

Computer-assisted technique versus intramedullary and extramedullary alignment systems in total knee replacement: a radiological comparison.

Malalignment in total knee replacement (TKR) is frequently associated with earlier failure and poor functional results. The authors compare the radiological results achieved in three consecutive series of TKRs using a computer-based alignment system (38 cases), a totally intramedullary alignment system (40 cases) and a totally extramedullary alignment system (37 cases). The frontal-femoral-component angle (FFC), the frontal-tibial-component angle (FTC), the hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) and the sagittal orientation of the tibial component (slope) were evaluated 12 months after operation. The results did not show any statistically significant differences between the mean values of FFC, FTC, HKA angles and tibial slope among the three groups. However in the extramedullary alignment group there was a statistically higher percentage of TKRs with abnormal FFC and HKA angles. Furthermore all the implants in the computer aligned group were aligned within 4 degrees both of an ideal HKA and tibial slope.