No difference in gait pattern between a short collum femoris-preserving and a conventional stem: 44 randomised total hip arthroplasty patients stem evaluated after 2 years.

BACKGROUND: The uncemented collum femoris-preserving (CFP) stem offers preservation of the femoral neck and a more conservative soft tissue resection, which may facilitate a more normal walking pattern. We used gait analysis to evaluate if patients operated with a CFP stem showed more favourable hip kinematics and kinetics when compared with a group of patients operated with a conventional uncemented stem. METHODS: 44 patients randomised to receive either a CFP or a Corail stem were studied and were operated using a direct lateral incision. Gait analysis was performed 2 years after the operation with a 12-camera motion capture system and 2 force plates. Hip kinematics and kinetics were analysed and 66 subjects served as controls. RESULTS: None of the variables: speed, stride, cadence and stance showed any statistical significant difference between the 2 study groups. Neither did the hip kinematics and kinetics. Compared to controls, patients operated with the CFP stem showed an increased stance (62.5% vs. 61.1%, p < 0.006) and decreased hip abduction (-2.1° vs. -6.5°). Patients operated with the Corail stem showed decreased speed (1.18 vs. 1.23 m/second), and stride length (1.26 vs. 1.33 m), decreased hip extension (-7.5° vs. -12.8°) and range of hip flexion/extension (38° vs. 40.9°), as well as their hip adduction that was increased (6.3° vs. 4°), whereas their hip abduction was reduced (-2.8° vs. -6.5°), (p < 0.004) compared to the controls. CONCLUSIONS: Use of a CFP stem did not significantly influence any of the gait parameters studied when compared to a standard stem, but still both stems studied were associated with gait deviations when compared to controls. Whether these differences could be attributed to the stem used, the underlying hip disease, or both is still unknown.

Similar clinical results and early subsidence between the Collum Femoris Preserving and the Corail stem: a randomized radiostereometric study of 77 hips with 2 years' follow-up.

Background and purpose - Femoral neck preserving hip replacement has been suggested to improve clinical results and facilitate late revision. We compared the 2-year outcome and radiostereometric pattern of femoral head migration between the Collum Femoris Preserving (CFP) stem and the Corail stem. Patients and methods - 83 patients were randomized to either a CFP stem or a Corail stem. All patients received the same cup. At 2 years clinical outcomes were assessed using validated scoring systems and plain radiographs. 2-year migration was determined using radiostereometric analysis. Results - At 2 years the clinical outcomes (Oxford Hip Score, Harris Hip Score, SF-36, EQ5D-VAS, satisfaction VAS, and pain VAS) were similar between the 2 groups. The radiographic measurements showed that the femoral neck was resected around 1 cm more proximally with use of CFP stems (p < 0.001). The proximal-distal and medial-lateral migration of the femoral head center was similar. The Corail stem showed increased posterior displacement after 1 year, but no difference was found between the absolute translations in the anterior-posterior direction (p = 0.2). 2 CFP stems were revised due to loosening within the first 2 years. None of the Corail stems was revised. Interpretation - In the 2-year perspective clinical outcomes suggested no obvious advantages with use of the CFP stem. The magnitude of the early stem migration was similar, but the pattern of migration differed. The early revisions in the CFP are a cause of concern.

1-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty operation in 22 patients with use of short and standard stem length on either side: gait analysis 1 and 2 years after bilateral THA.

BACKGROUND: According to previous gait analyses, insertion of a total hip arthroplasty (THA) will improve the range of hip flexion-extension but not to normal. Use of short stems could have a potential to improve the motion by preservation of more bone and muscular attachments. We evaluated whether a short femoral stem resulted in improved hip motion compared to a conventional stem in patients who underwent 1-stage bilateral THA. The most painful hip was randomised to either design and the 2nd hip was operated with the design not used on the 1st side. METHODS: Gait analysis was performed with an optical tracking system in 22 patients. The follow-up was performed 1 and 2 years after the operation. The mean age was 59 (SD 7.7) years and body mass index was 27.7 (SD 4.3). 66 subjects without hip pathology served as controls. RESULTS: Minimal differences were observed, between or within the 2 different stem designs during gait at the 2 follow-up occasions. Comparison between each of the 2 stem designs and controls at 2 years revealed reduced stride length (p = 0.009), cadence, hip extension (p<0.001) and hip extension-flexion range (p = 0.021) for both designs. Furthermore, the range of hip adduction-abduction (p = 0.046) and hip abduction moment for both designs in the frontal plane was also reduced bilaterally (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in gait parameters between the short and the conventional stem after 1-stage bilateral THA. Although both hip joints were operated at the same time motions and moments did not normalise after bilateral 1-stage operations.