Antenatal course of referred monochorionic diamniotic twins complicated by selective intrauterine growth restriction (SIUGR) type III.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the antenatal course of selective intrauterine growth restriction (SIUGR) type III patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of monochorionic diamniotic twins with SIUGR type III. Patients were divided into those who did and did not progress to SIUGR type II or twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) (Groups A and B, respectively). Patient characteristics and perinatal survival were compared by Group, and continuous data are reported as median (range). RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were studied; Group A [26 (54.2%)] and Group B [22 (45.8%)]. The difference in 30-day survivorship for the appropriate for gestational age twin (88.5 vs. 100%, p = .2394) and for the SIUGR twin (73.1 vs. 95.5%, p = .0551) was not statistically significant. However, dual survivorship was lower in Group A compared to Group B (69.2 vs. 95.4%, p = .0276). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the SIUGR type III patients had antenatal progression. Lack of antenatal progression was associated with 95% dual survivorship. RATIONALE: The antenatal course of monochorionic diamniotic twins complicated by SIUGR type III is not well-understood and antenatal management remains a clinical dilemma. We provide pregnancy outcomes in a referred group of SIUGR type III patients, including the rate of progression to SIUGR type II and TTTS.

Percent Absent End-Diastolic Velocity in the Umbilical Artery and Donor Twin Demise after Laser Surgery for Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome.

INTRODUCTION: To examine the association of preoperative absent end-diastolic velocity (AEDV) and percent AEDV (%AEDV) in the umbilical artery (UA) with donor twin intrauterine fetal demise (IUFD) after laser surgery for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of stage III/IV TTTS patients who underwent laser surgery from 2006 to 2016. Donors were classified as having preoperative persistent AEDV (yes/no). %AEDV was calculated for those with AEDV as 100× the proportion of the total cardiac cycle in AEDV. Using multiple logistic regression, we tested for an association between the outcome donor IUFD and AEDV risk factors (part 1) and %AEDV (part 2). We stratified these analyses by estimated fetal weight (EFW) discordance ≥20 versus <20%. RESULTS: Of 344 cases, 153 (44.5%) donors had AEDV. Part 1 did not confirm an independent association between AEDV and donor IUFD. In the part 2 analysis of the 153 patients with AEDV, %AEDV was a positive risk factor for donor IUFD only in those with discordance (n = 129) (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.08, p = 0.0278) when adjusting for %EFW discordance, presence of arterioarterial anastomoses, and multiparity. DISCUSSION: Among stage III/IV TTTS patients with AEDV, %AEDV was a risk factor for donor IUFD only in the presence of EFW discordance.