Response of Pemphigus betae (Hemiptera: Aphididae) and Beneficial Epigeal Arthropod Communities to Sugarbeet Plant Density and Seed-Applied Insecticide in Western Nebraska.

This study investigated the impact of a neonicotinoid seed-applied insecticide (Poncho Beta) and two plant densities (86,487 and 61,776 plants per hectare) on the sugarbeet root aphid (Pemphigus betae Doane), beneficial epigeal arthropods, and selected crop yield parameters in sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L. var. vulgaris). Ground beetles and centipedes were the most commonly collected taxa during 2012 and 2013, respectively. Centipede, spider, and rove beetle activity densities were not affected by the seed-applied insecticide, whereas plant density had a marginal effect on centipede activity density during 2012. Ground beetle species richness, diversity, and evenness were also not impacted by the seed treatments. However, during 2013, ground beetle activity density was significantly higher in plots planted with untreated sugarbeet seeds due to the abundance of Bembidion quadrimaculatum oppositum Say. Sugarbeet root aphid populations were significantly higher in the untreated plots during both years. In 2012, sugarbeet tonnage and sugar yield were higher under the low plant density treatment, while higher sugar content was recorded from the seed-applied insecticide plots (2013). Seed-applied neonicotinoids and plant density had little impact on beneficial epigeal arthropod activity density. Seed treatment did result in decreased root aphid populations; however, these reductions were not sufficient to be considered as an adequate control. This limited aphid control likely contributed to inconsistent effects on yield parameters.

Dung dispersal and grazing area following treatment of horses with a single dose of ivermectin.

Environmental consequences of treating horses with recommended dosages of ivermectin paste were studied in two controlled experiments with 29 horses in Ohio. In 1988, dung dispersal rates were measured by changes in dry weight over time of 48 copromes (300 g) formed from feces taken from four treatment and four control horses 3 days post ivermectin treatment. There was delayed dispersal of copromes from horses treated with ivermectin in June, resulting in significantly heavier ivermectin copromes compared with those of control horses by September. There was no difference in ivermectin or control copromes after treatment in August. In 1989, the effects of treating horses with oral ivermectin or oxibendazole compared with untreated controls were quantified in a study with 21 horses under natural grazing conditions after treatment on 7 June. Sequential measurements of dung pat circumferences from 20 June 1989 to 7 March 1990 showed highly significant differences between ivermectin and control pats and between ivermectin and oxibendazole pats. Reductions in mean dung pat diameters did not occur in ivermectin pats until 11 October, when there was a 4.1% reduction compared with 35.1% for control pats and 37.2% for oxibendazole pats. By the end of the study, there was a 24.7% reduction in ivermectin pats compared with 59.1% and 59.9% for control and oxibendazole pats respectively. In addition, there were significantly more pats showing complete dispersal in oxibendazole or control plots than in ivermectin plots. The calculated grazing area lost to feces was three times greater for ivermectin plots than for oxibendazole or control plots. It is suggested that environmental effects of the avermectins can be reduced by more rational use of anthelmintics.