Measuring practice preference variation for quality improvement: development of the Neonatology Survey of Interdisciplinary Groups in Healthcare Tool (NSIGHT).

BACKGROUND: Understanding behavioural psychology and the human side of change are guiding principles for quality improvement (QI). Tools to measure these to guide improvement efforts are lacking. METHODS: We created a clinical vignette-based survey to measure provider preferences for respiratory care in the neonatal intensive care unit. Fourteen vignettes were included, each vignette offering two reasonable practice choices. Responses were based on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from neutral to strong preference for either choice. The survey was completed by physicians, nurses, advanced practice providers and respiratory therapists in 2017 and again in 2019. Net preference was measured as the median value of responses, and agreement was measured as the SD of responses. Net preference and agreement were assessed for all responses, by discipline, and by year. RESULTS: Response rates were 51% of all staff in 2017 and 57% in 2019. Vignettes asking about non-invasive respiratory support showed more defined net preferences and higher agreement between years, coinciding with QI efforts and guideline implementation in this area during the interval time. Results on other areas of practice were consistent between years. Discipline comparisons showed nurses and physicians agreed the least often. Six response patterns were identified, ranging from net preference and high agreement to no net preference and low agreement. CONCLUSION: We propose this survey, called the Neonatology Survey of Interdisciplinary Groups in Healthcare Tool, is a novel method for measurement of hospital unit psychology and culture. Demonstrated improvement where QI efforts were focused and consistency in results in other areas support the validity of this tool. Measuring the human side of change may impact QI efforts.

Using the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit Wisely: A National Survey of Clinicians Regarding Practices for Lower-Acuity Care.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to document the practices and preferences of neonatal care stakeholders regarding location and duration of care for newborns with low illness acuity. STUDY DESIGN: We developed a survey instrument that comprised 14 questions across 2 global scenarios and 7 specific clinical conditions. The latter included apnea of prematurity, gestational age for neonatal intensive care unit admission, jaundice, neonatal opioid withdrawal, thermoregulation, and sepsis evaluation. Respondents reported their current practice and preferences for an alternative approach. We administered the survey to individuals in the membership email distribution lists of the American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine, the National Association of Neonatal Nurses, and the Vermont Oxford Network. RESULTS: Of 2284 respondents, 53% believed that infants were, in general, admitted to a higher level of care than was required, and only 13% reported that the level of care was too low. Length of stay was perceived to be generally too long by 46% of respondents and too short by 21%. Across 10 specific clinical questions, there was substantial variability in current practice and up to 35% of respondents reported discordance between current and preferred practice. These respondents preferred a lower level of care in 8 of 10 scenarios. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary sample of US clinicians reported significant variation in the level and duration of care for infants with low illness acuity. Among individuals reporting discordance between current and preferred practice, a majority believed that current management could be accomplished in a lower level of care location.

Infant Outcomes among Teenage and Young Mothers: Racial Inequities and the Role of Educational Attainment.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the association of age-appropriate maternal educational attainment in teenage and young mothers on infant health outcomes across racial/ethnic groups. STUDY DESIGN: In this retrospective, cross-sectional study using Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research Natality data (2016-2017), we included live births comparing 14- to 19- year-old mothers with 20- to 24-year-old mothers. To analyze the association of maternal age-appropriate education (≥8th grade for 15-18 years of age, 9th-12th grade/completed high school for 19-24 years of age), we conducted multivariable regression adjusting for mothers' demographics, reporting adjusted incidence rate ratios with 95% CI for infant mortality rate, and logistic regression for extreme prematurity and low birth weight, reporting aORs with 95% CI. RESULTS: From 2016 to 2017, there were 1 976 334 live births among women 14-24 years of age; 407 576 (20.6%) were in 14- to 19-year-olds. In the multivariable model, increased term infant mortality rate was associated with age 14-19 years (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.18, 95% 1.10, 1.27), age-inappropriate education (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.38, 95% CI 1.28, 1.48), and non-Hispanic Black mothers (adjusted incidence rate ratio 1.21, 95% CI 1.12, 1.30). Extreme prematurity was associated with women age 14-19 years (aOR 1.35, 95% CI 1.30, 1.40), non-Hispanic Black (aOR 2.50, 95% CI 2.39, 2.61), and Hispanic mothers (aOR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04, 1.15). Term infant low birth weight was associated with age 14-19 years (aOR 1.14, 95% CI 1.12, 1.16), age-inappropriate education for non-Hispanic White (aOR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11, 1.21), and non-Hispanic Black (aOR 1.08, 1.04, 1.12) mothers. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate maternal educational attainment, which is influenced by modifiable social policies, is associated with increased adverse infant outcomes in mothers 14-24 years of age.

Antiracism in the Field of Neonatology: A Foundation and Concrete Approaches.

Neonatal patients and families from historically marginalized and discriminated communities have long been documented to have differential access to health care, disparate health care, and as a result, inequitable health outcomes. Fundamental to these processes is an understanding of what race and ethnicity represent for patients and how different levels of racism act as social determinants of health. The NICU presents a unique opportunity to intervene with regard to the detrimental ways in which structural, institutional, interpersonal, and internalized racism affect the health of newborn infants. The aim of this article is to provide neonatal clinicians with a foundational understanding of race, racism, and antiracism within medicine, as well as concrete ways in which health care professionals in the field of neonatology can contribute to antiracism and health equity in their professional careers.

Choosing wisely for the other 80%: What we need to know about the more mature newborn and NICU care.

Although neonatal intensive unit (NICU) care is envisioned as the care of very immature infants, more than 95% of births and 80% of NICU admissions are of more mature newborns-infants born at 34 or more weeks' gestation. In spite of the size of this population there are important gaps in the understanding of their needs and optimal management as reflected by remarkably large unexplained variation in their care. The goal of this article is to describe what is known about the more mature, higher birth weight newborn population's use of NICU care and highlight important gaps in knowledge and obstacles to research. Research priorities are identified: including (1) the need for birth population based rather than NICU based studies, and (2) population specific data elements. Summary: More mature newborns-infants of 34 or more weeks' gestation-account for most NICU admissions. There are large gaps in the understanding of their needs and optimal management as reflected by large unexplained variation in their care. We enumerate these gaps in current knowledge and suggest research priorities to address them.

Economics at the frontline: Tools and tips for busy clinicians.

Frontline providers of neonatal care have a moral imperative to enhance value and inform senior administrators of how to most efficiently spend healthcare dollars. This article argues that the frontline is the ideal setting to pursue these efforts, offers recommendations for how to measure value, and describes five simple yet effective concrete tools that can improve value. It concludes with tips on advancing a value-added agenda through the Model for Improvement and advice for teams on ways of approaching senior leaders to help align unit-level aims with system-level goals and mission. Armed with these instruments, multidisciplinary teams can help ensure that neonatal care remains at the forefront of high-value healthcare.

Glucose concentrations in enterally fed preterm infants.

OBJECTIVES: Determine the prevalence of glucose concentrations below the Pediatric Endocrine Society (PES) term and late preterm-focused guideline target for mean glucose concentrations (≥70 mg/dL) among preterm NICU infants on full enteral nutrition and assess the impact on monitoring practices. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: We analyzed 1717 infants who were at least 2 days old and 48 hours after parenteral fluids were discontinued. Glucose concentrations were ≥70, 60-69, 50-59, and <50 mg/dL in 76.6, 16.2, 5.9, and 1.3% of measurements, respectively. In multivariate models, concentrations <60 mg/dL were common among male infants at lower postnatal age, small-for-gestational age, and born to women with hypertension (p < 0.05). After PES guideline, infants were more likely to have >3 glucose measurements (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Glucose concentrations <70 mg/dL are not uncommon among preterm infants receiving full enteral nutrition. Monitoring increased after guideline publication. Applying PES threshold to well-appearing preterm infants may promote increased monitoring and intervention without clear long-term benefit.

The color of health: how racism, segregation, and inequality affect the health and well-being of preterm infants and their families.

Racism, segregation, and inequality contribute to health outcomes and drive health disparities across the life course, including for newborn infants and their families. In this review, we address their effects on the health and well-being of newborn infants and their families with a focus on preterm birth. We discuss three causal pathways: increased risk; lower-quality care; and socioeconomic disadvantages that persist into infancy, childhood, and beyond. For each pathway, we propose specific interventions and research priorities that may remedy the adverse effects of racism, segregation, and inequality. Infants and their families will not realize the full benefit of advances in perinatal and neonatal care until we, collectively, accept our responsibility for addressing the range of determinants that shape long-term outcomes.

A Collaborative Multicenter QI Initiative to Improve Antibiotic Stewardship in Newborns.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if NICU teams participating in a multicenter quality improvement (QI) collaborative achieve increased compliance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) core elements for antibiotic stewardship and demonstrate reductions in antibiotic use (AU) among newborns. METHODS: From January 2016 to December 2017, multidisciplinary teams from 146 NICUs participated in Choosing Antibiotics Wisely, an Internet-based national QI collaborative conducted by the Vermont Oxford Network consisting of interactive Web sessions, a series of 4 point-prevalence audits, and expert coaching designed to help teams test and implement the CDC core elements of antibiotic stewardship. The audits assessed unit-level adherence to the CDC core elements and collected patient-level data about AU. The AU rate was defined as the percentage of infants in the NICU receiving 1 or more antibiotics on the day of the audit. RESULTS: The percentage of NICUs implementing the CDC core elements increased in each of the 7 domains (leadership: 15.4%-68.8%; accountability: 54.5%-95%; drug expertise: 61.5%-85.1%; actions: 21.7%-72.3%; tracking: 14.7%-78%; reporting: 6.3%-17.7%; education: 32.9%-87.2%; P < .005 for all measures). The median AU rate decreased from 16.7% to 12.1% (P for trend < .0013), a 34% relative risk reduction. CONCLUSIONS: NICU teams participating in this QI collaborative increased adherence to the CDC core elements of antibiotic stewardship and achieved significant reductions in AU.