Glucose Levels During Dialysis with Glucose-Free Versus Glucose-Rich Dialysate Fluid.

INTRODUCTION: Asymptomatic hypoglycaemia has been reported in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients on haemodialysis. Uremic symptoms as inadequate appetite, nausea and vomiting worsen the risk of hypoglycaemia at dialysis initiation. As a standard therapeutic approach for decreasing this risk and dis-equilibrium syndrome at our dialysis unit, a continuous venous 5% glucose solution is applied during the glucose-free dialysate (GFD) dialysis. In this interventional study we sought to assess the glycaemic control during standard initiating dialysis protocol versus novel approach with glucose-rich dialysis fluid (GRD). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty-one dialysis patients with chronic renal failure were dialyzed alternatively using GRD (5.6 mmol/l) and GFD fluid. They were not taking any hypoglycaemic medication prior and food during dialysis session. Blood was sampled at regular intervals during dialysis. The dialysis prescription consisted of ultrafiltration (UF) of up to 1 L, membrane surface (MS) up to 1.4 square meters and duration time of 2-2.5 hours. Intra-patient glycaemic variability was defined by Coefficient of variation (CV). In paired analysis t-test was used to determine the glucose control differences in both therapeutic approaches in each patient. For the whole group t-test was used to assess the glucose variability as CV. RESULTS: The mean age of study participants was 62.95±11.73 years; 7 (33%) had diabetes. The two dialysis approaches did not differ in respect of initial blood pressure, UF and MS. Only two episodes of hypoglycaemia occurred in both types of dialysis. The mean glucose level was higher during GRD (8.15±1.89 vs. 6.29±1.33, p=0.001), respectively. The glucose CV was lower in GRD dialysis when pared t-test was applied, without significant difference (16.97± 8.86 vs. 21.05±11.99, p=0.151). When only diabetic patients were analysed, there was no significant glucose CV difference as well (p=0.151). For the whole cohort glucose variability was significantly higher in glucose-free dialysate dialysis (p=0.0001). CONCLUSION: The GRD approach for initiating dialysis sessions is non-inferior to standard GFD care. Dialysate rich in glucose obtains better glucose control during dialysis compared to glucose-free dialysate.

Hypomagnesemia and cause-specific mortality in hemodialysis patients: 5-year follow-up analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the association between serum magnesium (Mg) and mortality, in particular the cause-specific mortality of Mg and other risk factors in hemodialysis (HD) patients. METHODS: We studied a cohort of 185 HD patients receiving thrice-weekly HD treatment, on a dialysate Mg concentration of 0.5 mmol/L. We stratified 3 patient groups according to the level of Mg: lower (<1.1 mmol/L), intermediate-reference (1.1 to <1.3 mmol/L), and higher (Mg >1.3 mm/L). RESULTS: During the 5-year follow-up, 60 patients died, with cardiovascular (CV) disease as the predominant cause (73.3%). Hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause and CV mortality were 2.55 and 2.67 in the lower versus intermediate Mg group, but there was no significant association between the higher and intermediate Mg group. Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that Mg <1.1 versus 1.1-1.30 mml/L with HR 2.34, was a significant univariate predictor for increased mortality in addition to the Hb <110 g/L, Alb <40 g/L, C-reactive protein (CRP) ≥10 mg/L and brain natriuretic peptide >1,200 pg/mL. However, in the multivariate analysis only CRP ≥10 mg/L with HR 3.89 was a significant predictor of mortality. Subgroup analyses showed that among patients with CRP >10 mg/L, HR for all-cause and CV mortality of the lower versus intermediate Mg group were 1.96 and 2.39, respectively, not reaching significance for the higher versus intermediate Mg group. Conversely, there was no association between Mg level and all-cause and CV mortality within these 3 groups among patients with CRP <10 mg/L. CONCLUSIONS: Lower serum Mg level was significantly associated with an increased all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in HD patients, especially in inflamed patients.

Protocol for performing nephrological activity in the Republic of Macedonia.

The fast development of nephrology in the world, especially in the second half of the 20 th century demanded protocol (guidelines) for nephrological activity for all levels of medical care, of doctors and specialists. The International Society of Nephrology, the European Renal Association and other national associations created their own protocol (guidelines) for nephrological activity. The Macedonian Society of Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation and Artificial Organs (MSNDTAO) proclaimed the First Protocol for Performing Nephrological Activity in the Republic of Macedonia at the First Congress of the MSNDTAO, held in Ohrid 1993, and it was published in the Macedonian Medical Review, 1994; Supplement 14: 397-406 [1]. The update of the Protocol for Performing Nephrological Activity in the Republic of Macedonia was proclaimed at the Fourth Congress of MSNDTAO, held in Ohrid 2012 and it presented in this text.